Last updated 14 August 2026 · 15 figures · 7 primary sources

Late payment statistics: China

Most Chinese companies pay B2B invoices on time, but severe delays of 90-plus days still touch a meaningful share of the rest.

The China payment picture

57.4%paid on time

Share of Chinese companies paying B2B invoices on time in Q4 2025, with severe delays (90-plus days) down to 3.2%.

57.4%paid on time
42.6%paid late

Source: CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026 (22nd edition)

83%

of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, including 38% carrying 31-60% of invoices overdue at any time.

Atradius, 2026 →
21%

of Chinese B2B suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed.

Atradius, 2026 →
+15.9pp

jump in the share of Chinese companies reporting ultra-long payment delays (180-plus days) worth over 2% of turnover, to 49% in 2024 from 33.1% in 2023.

Coface, 2025 →

Debitura Collection Risk Score

China scores 5.8 out of 10 for collection risk

A Chinese B2B receivable carries meaningfully more collection risk than the low-band countries in this report. Coface rates the country’s country risk ‘B’ (Fairly High), Allianz Trade ranks Chinese collection procedure ‘Severe’ - the 6th most complex of the 52 economies it scores - and the World Justice Project places Chinese civil justice 70th of 143 countries. For a creditor with debtors in China, that combination means budgeting for a slower, more contested recovery process than in a Low or Moderate-band market, not a higher chance of non-payment on any single invoice.

5.8Elevated

Based on 3 of 4 sources

66/100

Severe collection complexity on Allianz Trade’s 2026 ranking - the 6th most complex of 52 economies, a steeper rating than any other country covered so far in this report.

Allianz Trade, 2026 →
70th of 143

China’s rank on the World Justice Project’s Civil Justice factor - the weakest civil-justice score of the countries covered so far in this report.

World Justice Project, 2025 →
Coface Country Risk AssessmentB
retrieved 6 August 2026
6.1
Allianz Collection Complexity Score 202666 / 100
Statistical Appendix 1, p. 24
6.6
WJP Rule of Law Index 2025 - Civil Justice0.53
ranked 70th of 143
4.7
World Bank B-READY 2025China is not coverednot available
How the score is calculated, and what it is not

The Debitura Collection Risk Score is an editorial comparison index covering 177 countries, built from four public, independently published sources and shown on a 1-10 scale where 10 is the highest collection risk. It displays in four bands: Low below 3.5, Moderate 3.5-4.9, Elevated 5.0-6.4, High 6.5 and above. China’s 5.8 falls in the Elevated band.

Each available component is mapped onto the common 1-10 scale with a fixed linear mapping, and the score is the simple average of whichever components exist. Coface: A1=1.0, A2=2.3, A3=3.6, A4=4.9, B=6.1, C=7.4, D=8.7, E=10.0. Allianz: max(1, score ÷ 10). B-READY: max(1, (100 - the average of the Dispute Resolution and Business Insolvency topic scores) ÷ 10). WJP: max(1, (1 - score) × 10). A country needs at least two of the four to receive a score. For China: (6.1 + 6.6 + 4.7) ÷ 3 = 5.8.

China’s score rests on three of the four components. The World Bank’s B-READY 2025 dataset does not cover China - the country is not among its 101 economies - so the dispute-resolution and business-insolvency component is absent rather than estimated.

This is not a credit rating. The Debitura Collection Risk Score is an editorial comparison index for a statistics and journalism product. It is not a credit rating, not a probability of default, not a measure of any individual company’s creditworthiness, and not legal or financial advice. It is not produced by a regulated rating agency and must not be used as a substitute for one.

Payment behaviour

Short on trade credit, long on terms

Chinese suppliers extend the least trade credit of the Asian markets Atradius surveys, yet the payment terms they do grant run as long as anywhere in the region - and the tail of slow payers is the region’s longest.

38%

of Chinese B2B sales are made on trade credit - the lowest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed, against a 43% regional average.

Atradius, 2026 →
54%

of Chinese B2B suppliers set payment terms under 30 days - tied with Japan for the highest share of the 8 Asian markets surveyed.

Atradius, 2026 →
5%

of Chinese B2B suppliers report DSO above 90 days - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed.

Atradius, 2026 →
~94 days

average Days Sales Outstanding in China - relatively high against most countries Allianz Trade covers, and not efficiently regulated, per Allianz’s 2026 report.

Allianz Trade, 2026 →

These are two different measures from two different sources - Atradius’s share-exceeding-90-days figure and Allianz’s separate average-DSO estimate are not directly comparable.

Payment terms, five years

Terms have swung with the cycle, not settled into one

76 daysaverage payment term granted in 2024, up from 70 in 2023

Average B2B payment terms in China rose to 76 days in 2024 from 70 in 2023 - tied with Taiwan for the longest of the nine Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveys, and above the regional average. Coface →

Average payment term granted, China

Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025, 2020-2024

Average payment term granted, ChinaChina average B2B payment term granted, in days, 2020 to 2024: 77 days in 2020, 77 in 2021, 81 in 2022, 70 in 2023, 76 in 2024.772020772021812022702023762024

Source: Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025

‘Disputes over quality’ and ‘goods or services not as agreed’ tie as the top reasons Chinese B2B customers give for paying late, each cited by 55% of respondents - well ahead of a complex payment process (41%) or the customer’s own cash-flow issues (24%).

55%tie for the top reason B2B customers cite for paying late

Source: Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026

What it costs

From an overdue invoice to a smaller investment budget

Most overdue Chinese invoices do get paid eventually. The share that does not follows a short, visible path: from overdue, to written off, to a supplier cutting back on its own investment.

Step 1 - the invoice83%

of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, including 38% carrying 31-60% of invoices overdue at any time. Atradius →

Step 2 - the write-off21%

wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed. Atradius →

Step 3 - the consequence51%

say customer payment risk is what most limits their investment - ahead of reduced liquidity headroom (38%), cash-flow planning strain (33%) and higher capital costs (30%). Atradius →

Even as most invoices are eventually settled, severe delays are not shrinking fast: 3.2% of Chinese companies experienced severe payment delays (over 90 days) in Q4 2025 - down only slightly on the year, per CRIBIS D&B’s punctuality release.

3.2%share of Chinese companies with severe (90-plus day) payment delays in Q4 2025

Source: CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026

China and its region

China against its Asia-Pacific peers

Four separate benchmarks rank China near the harder end of the Asia-Pacific range Coface and Atradius survey. Each row compares China with the nearest values the publisher itself reports; figures from different publishers are not combined.

Average payment term granted, 2024China vs. Asia-Pacific · Coface →
China76
Taiwan76
Thailand74
Japan73
Ultra-long payment delay growth, 2023 to 2024 (points)China vs. Asia-Pacific · Coface →
China15.9
Thailand16.4
Malaysia14.0
Bad debt write-offs above 5% of sales, 2026China vs. Asia-Pacific · Atradius →
China21
India20
Indonesia16
Vietnam16
Trade credit share of B2B sales, 2026China vs. Asia-Pacific · Atradius →
China38
Hong Kong39
Taiwan40
About this comparison

Each row draws on a single publisher’s own Asia-Pacific or Asian-market comparison table, so the bars within a row are directly comparable; rows are not comparable with one another. Coface’s Asia Payment Survey covers nine Asia-Pacific markets (Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand); Atradius’s statistical appendix covers eight Asian markets (China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam), shown alongside a separate Asia regional average. Bar lengths are drawn proportional to the value shown, scaled to the largest bar in each row; no figure has been rescaled, imputed or harmonised across sources. Named peers in each row are the publisher’s own nearest values to China’s, not the best-known regional economies.

Insolvencia

A rising insolvency count, and a growing share of the world’s total

+9%forecast rise in Chinese business insolvencies in 2026, to 7,750 cases

Allianz Trade counts 7,138 Chinese business insolvencies in 2025, up from 6,653 in 2024 and 6,481 in 2023, and forecasts a further 9% rise to 7,750 in 2026 and 8,150 in 2027. China now accounts for 18.7% of Allianz’s Global Insolvency Index - the second-largest single-country share, behind only the United States (27.8%). Eurostat’s register-based bankruptcy index used on this report’s European pages does not cover China, so Allianz Trade’s own count is the primary source here. Allianz Trade →

Chinese business insolvencies, actual and forecast

Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026, statistical appendix, 2023-2027

Chinese business insolvencies, actual and forecastChina business insolvency case counts, 2023 to 2027 forecast: 6,481 in 2023, 6,653 in 2024, 7,138 in 2025, 7,750 forecast for 2026, 8,150 forecast for 2027.64812023665320247138202577502026f81502027f

Source: Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026

For a creditor

What this means if your customers are in China

Three things the Chinese figures on this page imply for anyone holding a receivable from a Chinese customer.

Cash flow~3 months

A Chinese receivable can tie up a full quarter’s working capital

Days Sales Outstanding in China runs around 94 days on average - close to three months between delivery and cash - relatively high against most countries Allianz Trade covers. Allianz Trade →

Reading a delay83%

Some overdue invoices are ordinary, not a warning sign

83% of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, and only 17% report none at all - so an overdue invoice on its own is common rather than exceptional. The share that goes on to become a write-off is smaller but real: 21% of suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026. Atradius → Atradius →

Insolvency exposure18.7%

China carries the world’s second-largest share of business insolvencies

China accounts for 18.7% of Allianz Trade’s Global Insolvency Index - behind only the United States - and the country’s own insolvency count is forecast to keep rising, to 7,750 cases in 2026. Allianz Trade →

China statistics library

Find a Chinese statistic to cite

15 curated figures from 7 primary sources. Each carries its publisher, year and exact locator, and each has a permanent anchor you can link to directly.

15 statistics

Payment terms & delaysChinaQ4 2025

57.4% of companies in China paid their B2B invoices on time in Q4 2025, with severe delays (90+ days) down to 3.2%.

CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026 (22nd edition) Article section 'Payment punctuality worldwide: improvements in the United States and China'

Permalink
Collection complexityChina2026 (retrieved 6 August 2026)

Coface rates China 'B' (Fairly High) for country risk on its A1-E scale - the Coface Country Risk Assessment component (mapped 6.1) in Debitura's Collection Risk Score.

Coface Country Risk Map Coface Country Risk Map, interactive dashboard, China country pop-up (data-id="CN" data-rating="B"), retrieved 6 August 2026

Permalink
Collection complexityChina2026

China scores 66 out of 100 on the Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026, ranked 6th most complex of 52 economies tracked and rated 'Severe' - though improved from 71 in 2022, 73 in 2018 and 76 in 2014.

Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 Statistical Appendix 1 'Overview of ranking, score, ratings and sub-ratings by country', p. 24

Permalink
Payment terms & delaysChina2026 report

DSO in China runs around 94 days on average - relatively high compared with most countries Allianz covers - and late payments are not efficiently regulated, per Allianz's 2026 Collection Complexity report.

Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 'Collection Complexity in Asia' section, China bullet points, p. 18

Permalink
Courts & enforcementChina2025

China scores 0.53 on WJP's Civil Justice factor (Rule of Law Index 2025), ranked 70th of 143 countries - the score component used in Debitura's Collection Risk Score (mapped 4.7).

World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 WJP Rule of Law Index 2025, Civil Justice factor country dataset, China entry

Permalink
Payment terms & delaysChina2026

38% of Chinese B2B sales are made on trade credit (62% cash) - the lowest trade-credit share of the 8 Asian markets in Atradius' 2026 survey, against a regional average of 43%.

Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 3, table 'Share of total B2B sales by payment type - Region-Market'

Permalink
Payment terms & delaysChina2026

83% of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices (17% report none), including 38% with 31-60% of invoices overdue - above the 35% regional average for that band.

Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 5, table 'Payment behaviour of B2B customers (12 months) - Region-Market'

Permalink
Write-offs & bad debtChina2026

21% of Chinese B2B suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets surveyed, narrowly ahead of India (20%).

Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 7, table 'Share of annual B2B sales written off as bad debt - Region-Market'

Permalink
Payment terms & delaysChinaH2 2026 survey (Q2 2026 fieldwork)

'Disputes over quality' and 'Goods/services not as agreed' tie as the top reasons Chinese B2B customers cite for paying late, each named by 55% of respondents - well ahead of 'complex payment process' (41%) and 'customer cash flow issues' (24%).

Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026 Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026, p. 5, chart 'Top 4 reasons B2B customers pay invoices late'

Permalink
ConsequencesChinaH2 2026 survey (Q2 2026 fieldwork)

51% of Chinese B2B suppliers say customer payment risk most limits their investment - the top-ranked impact on working capital, ahead of reduced liquidity headroom (38%), cash-flow planning strain (33%) and higher capital costs (30%).

Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026 Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026, p. 5, chart 'Top 4 impacts of customer payment risk on working capital'

Permalink
Payment terms & delaysChina2024

Average B2B payment terms in China rose to 76 days in 2024 (from 70 in 2023) - tied with Taiwan for the longest payment terms among the 9 Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveyed, and above the APAC average.

Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 (June 2025), 'Payment Survey Results by Economy' section, China country box, p. 9

Permalink
Write-offs & bad debtChina2024

The share of Chinese companies reporting ultra-long payment delays (over 180 days) worth more than 2% of annual turnover jumped to 49% in 2024 from 33.1% in 2023 (+15.9 points) - the third-largest increase of the 9 Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveyed, behind India (+33 points) and Thailand (+16.4 points).

Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 (June 2025), 'Payment Survey Results by Economy' section, China country box, p. 9; narrative context p. 3

Permalink
InsolvencyChina2026 forecast (vs. 2025 actual 7,138)

Allianz forecasts Chinese business insolvencies to rise 9% in 2026 to 7,750 cases, continuing an upward trend since 2023 (6,481) - China accounts for 18.7% of Allianz's Global Insolvency Index, the second-largest single-country share after the United States (27.8%).

Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026 Statistical appendix, p. 26, China row

Permalink

Use the data

Cite and reuse the Chinese figures

This page keeps the same URL when the underlying sources are refreshed, so a link placed today keeps working. Every figure carries its own citation naming the original publisher first.

Reusing a figure? Please cite the original publisher - CRIBIS D&B, Coface, Allianz Trade, Atradius or the World Justice Project - and link to this page as the aggregator. We reproduce individual figures with attribution, not whole tables or reports.

Need help collecting debt in China?

If you are chasing an overdue invoice from a Chinese customer rather than researching the market, our China page covers how recovery works locally, who handles it and what it costs.

Cobro de deudas en China
6th of 52most complex place to collect a debt on Allianz Trade’s 2026 Collection Complexity ranking

Source: Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026

Method and sources

How this page is built

How the Debitura Collection Risk Score works

The score is an editorial comparison index built from four public, independently published sources. For each country we take whichever of the four are available, map each onto a common 1-10 scale using a fixed linear mapping, and take the simple average. A country needs at least two of the four to receive a score. Scores run 1 to 10, where 10 is the highest collection risk, and display in four bands: Low below 3.5, Moderate 3.5-4.9, Elevated 5.0-6.4, High 6.5 and above.

Mappings: Coface Country Risk Assessment A1=1.0, A2=2.3, A3=3.6, A4=4.9, B=6.1, C=7.4, D=8.7, E=10.0 (160 countries). Allianz Collection Complexity Score max(1, score ÷ 10) (52 economies). World Bank B-READY max(1, (100 - the average of the Dispute Resolution and Business Insolvency topic scores) ÷ 10) (101 economies). WJP Rule of Law Index Civil Justice factor max(1, (1 - score) × 10) (143 countries). China draws on three of the four - B-READY does not cover China.

This is not a credit rating. It is an editorial comparison index for a statistics and journalism product - not a credit rating, not a probability of default, not a measure of any individual company’s creditworthiness, and not legal or financial advice. It is not produced by a regulated rating agency and must not be used as a substitute for one.

How the Chinese figures were selected, and what is missing

Every figure on this page is drawn from one of the seven primary sources listed below, extracted with an exact page, chart or dataset locator, and published only where that locator was verified in the source file itself. Figures from different publishers are reported side by side rather than merged: CRIBIS D&B, Coface, Allianz Trade, Atradius and the World Justice Project each survey or measure different samples with different definitions, and their numbers are not interchangeable.

The headline figures at the top of this page come from CRIBIS D&B’s Q4 2025 settled-payment release (57.4% paid on time) and Coface’s Asia Payment Survey 2025 (payment terms and ultra-long delay trends). China draws on both a dedicated Atradius China barometer and the shared 8-market Atradius Asia statistical appendix, plus a Coface Asia Payment Survey with a full by-economy breakdown across nine markets - richer country-specific coverage than several of the report’s other wave-1 countries.

Known gaps for China. The World Bank’s B-READY 2025 dataset does not cover China, so the country has three of four score components rather than four, and no B-READY court-duration or insolvency-cost figures appear here. Eurostat’s register-based bankruptcy index, used on this report’s European pages, is EU-only and does not cover China; Allianz Trade’s own insolvency count and forecast are used instead. No Atradius International Debt Collection Handbook chapter or equivalent legal-framework source was available for China in this wave of extraction, so this page carries no limitation-period or default-interest figure, and the commercial CTA module uses a collection-complexity figure instead of a legal one - a declared substitution, not an estimate. Xero Small Business Insights does not cover China, so there is no monthly Chinese time-to-pay series of the kind shown on the United States page.

Primary sources used on this page
SourcePublisherYearChina coverage
Coface Country Risk MapCofaceretrieved 6 August 2026Score component A - China rated B
Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026Allianz Trade / Allianz Research2026Score component B - China 66/100, ranked 6th of 52
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025World Justice Project2025Score component D - China's Civil Justice factor 0.53, ranked 70th of 143
CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026 (22nd edition)CRIBIS D&B2026 (Q4 2025 data)Chinese on-time payment rate within a 37-country release
Atradius Payment Practices BarometerAtradius2026Chinese country barometer plus the 8-market Asia statistical appendix
Coface Payment Surveys (regional)Coface2025 (Asia wave)China country box within the 9-market Asia-Pacific payment survey
Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026Allianz Trade / Allianz Research2026Chinese insolvency counts 2023-2027 and Global Insolvency Index share
Update log

14 August 2026 - first publication of the China country report. 15 figures from 7 primary sources, plus the three Collection Risk Score components that cover China. This page is updated in place; new editions replace the content at this URL rather than creating a new year-specific page.