Top-Rated Debt Collection Agency in Poland

Your trusted debt collection agency in Poland. Upload your claim for swift, reliable recovery with no upfront fees. For a comprehensive understanding of local debt collection practices, explore our in-depth guide.

Get free expert advice
Get free advice from the best debt collection specialists.
Portrait of Our Debt Collection Expert - Dan, who is available for free, personalized advice.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.97/5 Average rating from 600+ reviews
Get a FREE evaluation of your claim
Fill out the form, and get a quick and free case evaluation.
We check if your claim is valid based on the statues of limitations
We provide you with a recommended recovery strategy
We forecast the recovery rate based on our database of resolved cases
We provide you with a free quote
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Ultimate Guide to Debt Collection in Poland

Welcome to "The Ultimate Guide to Debt Collection in Poland" – your premier resource for navigating the complexities of recovering debts in this jurisdiction. At Debitura, we merge our extensive local know-how with our global experience to offer unrivaled debt recovery solutions. Let us be your trusted partner in securing your financial interests in Poland.

Let Debitura Recover Your Claims - 100% Risk Free
Local Debt Collection Agencies and Attorneys

Debitura is a platform that connects you with local vetted collection agencies and lawyers around the world. Simply upload your case to our platform, and our local partners will provide you with a detailed quote within 48 hours.

Get up to3 custom quotes in 48 hours

Specify your requirements and we’ll align you with up to 3 leading collection agencies in under 48 hours. Each agency will offer a tailored, competitive rate, empowering you to make an informed decision.

Most of our partners offer a No Cre, No Pay pricing model for amicable debt recovery. This means that you Pay only upon successful recovery—ensuring the best value. Success fees range from 7.5% to 30%, payable only upon claim recovery. Create a free account, upload your claim, and get a tailored quote.

87% High Recovery Rate

Quick, professional and hassle-free B2B and B2C debt collection. 87% Consistent recovery rate – a testament to our global effectiveness. 4.97/5 Average rating from a diverse global clientele of over 5,000.

Quick Case Start

Quickly register for a free profile and effortlessly upload your claim within just 2 minutes. We synergize your request with our expansive network of over 500 attorneys and collection firms.

Global Experience

When it comes to international law expertise, debt collection, small claims filings, crafting precise demand letters, or finding top-notch lawyers worldwide, count on us as your trusted debt collection agency with a presence in 183 nations. Our comprehensive global investigations ensure you have the support you need.

Real-Time Tracking

Quickly register for a free profile and effortlessly upload your claim within just 2 minutes. Keep a close eye on your case progress through your dedicated dashboard.

The debt collection process in Poland

Understanding Poland's debt collection process is essential for creditors seeking to recover debts efficiently. This brief overview outlines the key stages involved, serving as a roadmap to navigate the complexities of Polish debt recovery. Choose Debitura for a risk-free, expert-guided journey through these steps.

Amicable Collection Phase

Initiate with a friendly, out-of-court collection aimed at an amicable resolution. This phase generally includes: Direct Communication, Reach out to your debtor to understand the payment delay. Payment Reminders: Use various communication methods (email, SMS, letters) for sending reminders. Formal Notice: Issue a formal notice letter, outlining the debt and the consequences of non-payment.

Court Proceedings

If the amicable approach fails, escalate the matter through legal proceedings to obtain a court judgment, essential for debt enforcement.

Debt Enforcement

With a court judgment in hand, you can pursue coercive measures like asset seizure and sale, referred to as debt enforcement.

Bankruptcy Proceedings

In cases where the debtor has no assets for seizure, consider filing for bankruptcy. If the debtor is already bankrupt, submit your claim promptly for verification.

Get streamlined, effective recovery support at every stage. Start your claim quickly with our hassle-free, no-fee service.

Principal Participants in Polish Debt Recovery

Understanding the debt recovery landscape in Poland requires familiarity with its main participants: collection agencies, bailiffs, and lawyers. Each plays a unique role in navigating the process toward successful debt recovery.

Debt Collection Agencies in Poland 

At the forefront of the Polish debt collection process are the debt collection agencies. These agencies primarily deal with the pre-legal phase of debt recovery, engaging directly with debtors to negotiate repayments. They operate under the Polish Act on Consumer Rights and other relevant legislation, aiming to settle debts outside the courtroom through negotiation and settlement agreements. The upcoming legislation seeks to introduce a licensing system and establish a Central Register for these agencies to promote transparency and accountability. However, for actions requiring judicial intervention, such as claims enforcement, they must collaborate with legal professionals.


Bailiffs in Poland 

Bailiffs in Poland hold a pivotal role in the enforcement of judicial decisions. They are empowered by the Polish law to execute court orders, enabling them to seize assets, garnish wages, and carry out evictions as part of the debt recovery process. The activities of bailiffs are regulated by the Act on Enforcement Proceedings in Administration, ensuring that their actions comply with legal standards. Despite their extensive power, bailiffs can only act upon receiving a valid court judgment or order, positioning them as crucial agents in the post-judicial phase of debt recovery.

Lawyers in Poland 

Lawyers specialize in navigating the legal complexities of debt collection in Poland, particularly in cases where disputes are intricate or involve substantial amounts. Their role encompasses preparing legal documentation, representing creditors in court proceedings, and providing strategic advice for legal enforcement actions. With expertise in Polish law, including the upcoming changes in debt collection regulations, lawyers are instrumental for creditors aiming to pursue judicial collection paths or engage in complex negotiations involving legal intricacies. Their involvement is crucial in ensuring that debt recovery actions adhere to legal standards while safeguarding the interests of creditors.

Tap into Debitura's expert network of local debt recovery bailiffs and lawyers. Start your claim now.

Exploring Amicable Debt Collection in Poland

Amicable debt collection in Poland leans on a strategy that puts relationships at the forefront of dues recovery, highlighting the importance of empathy and dialogue rather than direct confrontation. This approach is keen on preserving a healthy dynamic between the creditor and the debtor, seeking out resolutions that take into account the debtor's current situation while also ensuring the creditor's ability to reclaim owed funds. It advocates for a cooperative route, particularly suited for claims that are not under dispute, thereby circumventing the legal complexities and financial burdens associated with court proceedings.

It's advisable to begin with amicable debt collection except in cases where your claim is contentious or entangled in complex legal matters.

The Vital Role of Collection Agencies in Amicable Settlements in Poland

In the landscape of amicable settlements in Poland, the role of collection agencies cannot be overstated, especially for creditors who may not have the bandwidth or the specialized knowledge required for efficient debt recovery. Firms such as Debitura provide niche services that commence with the accurate identification of debts and debtors, progressing to the establishment of communication via reminders or official notices. Their neutral perspective, unencumbered by personal interests, frequently results in more effective debt resolution, thanks to their unbiased, expert negotiation.

The Benefits of Opting for Amicable Debt Resolution

Choosing amicable debt collection is advantageous for all involved parties; it enables creditors to avoid the hefty expenses associated with legal proceedings and helps in sustaining essential business relationships due to the method's considerate nature. Debtors are offered more flexible repayment arrangements, which lessen their financial burden and promote a positive outlook towards the creditor. This strategy is grounded in mutual respect and comprehension, fostering an ideal atmosphere for the settlement of financial dues.

Shifting from Amicable to Legal Debt Recovery

Although amicable debt recovery offers numerous benefits, there are occasions where legal intervention becomes a viable consideration. Triggers for moving towards legal recovery include a lack of communication, consistent non-fulfillment of financial commitments, or intentional avoidance by the debtor. Opting for legal action should be a well-contemplated final measure, due to the considerable expenses and time commitments associated with legal processes, and is generally recommended after all amicable avenues have been fully explored.

New to debt collection?
The debt collection process can be complex and daunting for those new to it. Our team of experts is here to help you understand the process and navigate it with ease. Get free expert advice on your specific case, provided by our team of experienced professionals.
5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating
“Debitura provided a seamless debt collection solution in Poland. Their professional team was able to recover our outstanding debts quickly and efficiently. We highly recommend their services.”
Anna Kowalska - Accounts Receivable Specialist
5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating
"Debitura helped us with debt recovery Netherlands and provided exceptional service. They were efficient, professional, and helped us collect what we were owed."
Katharina Schmidt - Controller
Average rating based on feedback from over 600 satisfied clients
Average debt recovery rate, exceeding industry standards
Debt recovered for our clients in the past 18 months

The debt collection process in Poland

Understanding Poland's debt collection process is essential for creditors seeking to recover debts efficiently. This brief overview outlines the key stages involved, serving as a roadmap to navigate the complexities of Polish debt recovery. Choose Debitura for a risk-free, expert-guided journey through these steps.

Overview of the Amicable Collection Process in Poland

In Poland, pre-legal debt collection involves negotiations and agreements outside of court to settle debts, typically performed by debt collection agencies. This section outlines the key practices and legal frames surrounding amicable debt recovery.

Amicable Collection - Key Takeways
  • Early Communication: Initiate with a registered demand letter to document the debt collection effort. 
  • Communication Regulations: Adhere to legal standards for transparent and documented exchanges. 
  • Collector Actions Restrictions: Reminders are allowed but harassment is a criminal offense. 
  • Fees and Interest Addition: Charge regulated fees and statutory interest for late payments. 
  • Statutory Interest Rates: As of October 4, 2023, the rate is set at 11.25% per annum. 
  • Essential Documentation: Efficient recovery needs signed contracts and accepted invoices. 
  • Payment Demand Letter: Should detail debt basis, amount due, and payment deadline. 
  • Negotiation Attempts: Before court, negotiation offers a chance for amicable resolution. 
  • Statute of Limitations: There's a limitation period after which court enforcement isn't possible. 
  • Transition to Judicial Recovery: If amicable efforts fail, consider judicial process escalation.

Exploring Amicable Debt Collection in Poland

Amicable debt collection in Poland leans on a strategy that puts relationships at the forefront of dues recovery, highlighting the importance of empathy and dialogue rather than direct confrontation. This approach is keen on preserving a healthy dynamic between the creditor and the debtor, seeking out resolutions that take into account the debtor's current situation while also ensuring the creditor's ability to reclaim owed funds. It advocates for a cooperative route, particularly suited for claims that are not under dispute, thereby circumventing the legal complexities and financial burdens associated with court proceedings.

It's advisable to begin with amicable debt collection except in cases where your claim is contentious or entangled in complex legal matters.

The Vital Role of Collection Agencies in Amicable Settlements in Poland

In the landscape of amicable settlements in Poland, the role of collection agencies cannot be overstated, especially for creditors who may not have the bandwidth or the specialized knowledge required for efficient debt recovery. Firms such as Debitura provide niche services that commence with the accurate identification of debts and debtors, progressing to the establishment of communication via reminders or official notices. Their neutral perspective, unencumbered by personal interests, frequently results in more effective debt resolution, thanks to their unbiased, expert negotiation.

The Benefits of Opting for Amicable Debt Resolution

Choosing amicable debt collection is advantageous for all involved parties; it enables creditors to avoid the hefty expenses associated with legal proceedings and helps in sustaining essential business relationships due to the method's considerate nature. Debtors are offered more flexible repayment arrangements, which lessen their financial burden and promote a positive outlook towards the creditor. This strategy is grounded in mutual respect and comprehension, fostering an ideal atmosphere for the settlement of financial dues.

Shifting from Amicable to Legal Debt Recovery

Although amicable debt recovery offers numerous benefits, there are occasions where legal intervention becomes a viable consideration. Triggers for moving towards legal recovery include a lack of communication, consistent non-fulfillment of financial commitments, or intentional avoidance by the debtor. Opting for legal action should be a well-contemplated final measure, due to the considerable expenses and time commitments associated with legal processes, and is generally recommended after all amicable avenues have been fully explored.

Explore our step-by-step guide for amicable debt collection

Step 1: Laying the Groundwork for Debt Collection in Poland

Efficient preparation is the cornerstone of a successful debt collection process. By meticulously setting the stage, creditors can significantly increase the probability of debt recovery, ensuring all legal and procedural elements align in their favor.

Step 1.1: Verify the Validity of Payment Terms

Understanding and validating payment terms is essential for any debt collection activity in Poland. These terms establish the timeline within which payments should be made and set the stage for any subsequent collection action if payments are overdue. Payment terms vary depending on the nature of the transaction—business-to-business (B2B), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-government (B2G).

  • B2B Transactions: Polish law requires invoices to specify due dates for payments, helping businesses delineate clear payment timelines. For transactions over 15,000 PLN involving specific goods or services, the split payment mechanism (MPP) becomes mandatory, necessitating specific notation on the invoice.
  • B2C Transactions: While specific payment conditions vary, consumer protection measures ensure transparency of payment terms, usually requiring that invoices be available upon request within three months of the transaction.
  • B2G Transactions: The split payment mechanism applies to certain B2G transactions as well, primarily for curtailing VAT fraud and ensuring payment transparency.

Regulation of payment terms is governed by the Act on Goods and Services Tax (VAT Act) and the Tax Ordinance Act, which include stipulations for invoice issuance, content, and storage.

Step 1.2: Check the Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations is a legal framework specifying the timeframe within which a creditor must initiate action to collect a debt. In Poland, the general limitation period for property claims is 6 years (previously 10 years), and for claims related to business activity or periodic performances, the period is 3 years.

An interruption of the statute, such as a debtor’s acknowledgment of the debt, resets the limitation period. This can be achieved through a formal letter wherein the debtor recognizes the debt, effectively allowing the creditor another full period to pursue legal action if needed.

An effective interruption letter should include:

  • Confirmation of the existence and amount of the debt.
  • Reference to the original contract or agreement.
  • Adequate identification of both creditor and debtor.
  • Date of acknowledgment.
  • A clear statement expressing the acknowledgment of the debt.

Such acknowledgment should preferably be documented in writing, ensuring that evidence is readily available should the need to initiate legal proceedings arise.

Step 1.3: Assembling Essential Documents

Successful debt collection in Poland necessitates the careful compilation of pertinent documents. These essential documents serve as evidence of the debt’s validity, enhancing the credibility and legitimacy of the claim.

For the Amicable Phase:

  • Signed contracts and accepted invoices/bills.
  • Payment demand letter, complete with detailed information regarding the debt and the creditor’s intentions.
  • Emails, SMS, or other communications confirming the debt obligation.

For the Judicial Phase:

  • A lawsuit filed in accordance with the civil procedure code.
  • Evidence of unsuccessful amicable collection attempts.

Maintaining a thorough record of communication throughout the debt collection process is pivotal. In cases where verbal agreements or negotiations take place, follow-up with written summaries via email or letter to keep a comprehensive log of interactions.

Step 2: Initiating Contact with Your Debtor

Establishing an open line of communication with debtors is a pivotal step in the amicable collection process. Effective communication facilitates dialogue, helping to uncover cooperative solutions and amicable settlements. Among the different communication channels, phone calls stand out as the most direct and impactful method for discussing and resolving debt issues.

Preparing to Call Your Debtor

Before making a call, it's imperative to understand the regulations governing extrajudicial debt collection in Poland. The legal landscape emphasizes fairness and transparency in debt collection efforts. As per the regulatory guidance, it is crucial to ensure all communication is within the bounds of respect and legality, aiming to protect both the creditor's rights and the debtor's dignity. 

Documenting Debt Details

Gathering all relevant information about the debt is crucial before initiating the call. This includes the origin of the debt, a breakdown of the principal amount, interest, fees, and records of any prior communications. This comprehensive preparation ensures clarity during the conversation, allowing for detailed and constructive dialogue.

Best Practices When Calling Your Debtor


  • Approach the conversation with professionalism and a respectful tone, aiming to understand the debtor's current circumstances.
  • Clearly articulate the call's purpose, including detailed information about the debt, to foster transparency and cooperation.
  • Explore mutually beneficial solutions, offering flexible payment arrangements when possible, considering the debtor’s financial situation.


  • Avoid using aggressive or threatening language that could be perceived as harassment or violate consumer protection laws.
  • Steer clear of making unrealistic demands or assurances that are not supported by the legal and financial framework governing debt collection.

Documenting the Call

It's essential to accurately document the conversation's details, including any agreements or payment plans discussed. This not only aids in maintaining clear records but is also crucial if the case escalates to judicial proceedings. Documentation ensures accountability and transparency throughout the collection process.

Follow-up Communication

Following the call, it is advisable to send a written summary of the discussion and any agreed-upon actions to the debtor. This reinforces the agreements made and provides both parties with a clear reference of what was discussed, further emphasizing the commitment to an amicable resolution.

Compliance and Consumer Protection

Adhering to regulations is paramount when engaging in debt collection activities in Poland. The updated legal landscape aims at striking a balance between efficient debt recovery and protecting consumers from undue distress. Complying with these regulations not only ensures the integrity of the collection process but also safeguards against potential legal repercussions. For a comprehensive understanding of consumer protection laws in Poland, reference can be made to UOKiK FAQ on Debt Collection Firms' Activities.

Step 3: Guide to Sending a Payment Reminder – Template Included

Effective debt collection in Poland can be greatly enhanced by the tactful use of payment reminders. This step is crucial in the amicable phase of collection, delicately balancing the urgency of payment with the preservation of business relationships. Below, we navigate through the nuances of payment reminders in Poland, providing insights and a template for your use.

Understanding Payment Reminders in Poland

In Poland, payment reminders serve as an amicable nudge to debtors about outstanding dues. They bridge the gap between informal nudges and more formal dunning letters, without the backing of a stringent legal framework. Instead, their effectiveness lies in the clarity of the message and the intention behind it.

Legal Framework for Payment Reminders

While Polish law doesn't prescribe an explicit process for sending payment reminders, their strategic use is vital. They do not alter the status of a debtor's default officially but serve as a prelude to potential legal actions if the need arises. This step is about persuasion, not coercion.

Preparing to Send a Payment Reminder

Success in this step hinges on the details. A payment reminder must include:

  • The identities of the creditor and the debtor
  • Detailed information about the overdue payment: invoice number, amount due, and the due date
  • A clear request for payment by a new proposed deadline
  • Potential consequences of non-payment, such as interest charges or legal actions

Ensuring the accuracy of these details is paramount, corroborating the legitimacy of the claim.

Crafting an Effective Payment Reminder

The tone of the reminder plays a significant role. It should be firm yet professional, aiming to maintain goodwill. Ensure to include:

  • Polite introduction and purpose of the reminder
  • Specific details of the overdue payment and any previous communication attempts
  • A reasonable deadline for payment settlement
  • An outline of the next steps should the payment remain outstanding

Sending the Reminder

Payment reminders can be delivered via email or registered mail. Each method has its merits, with email offering convenience and speed, while postal mail provides undeniable proof of delivery, an invaluable asset in potential legal actions.

Follow-Up After Sending a Reminder

If the reminder goes unanswered, subsequent reminders may follow, gradually escalating in tone. Alternately, if a response is received but full payment is not possible, negotiating payment terms or installment plans could be beneficial.

Documentation and Record-Keeping

Documenting every step of the communication process is crucial. Maintain records of all sent reminders, responses received, and any agreements made. This documentation could prove indispensable in eventual legal proceedings.

Payment reminders are more than a nudge for unsettled invoices — they're a critical part of the amicable debt collection process in Poland. Crafting them with care and adhering to best practices ensures your efforts are both effective and respectful.

Template for a Friendly but Firm Payment Reminder

Adhering to Poland's best practices, the following is a template for a friendly but firm payment reminder. This template balances the preservation of business relationships with the urgency of settling outstanding invoices.

Email Subject: Reminder: Payment Overdue for Invoice [Invoice Number]

Dear [Debtor's Name or Company Name],

I hope this message finds you well. We are reaching out to notify you that, as of [Date], we have not received payment for the following invoice:

  • Invoice Number: [Invoice Number]
  • Issued Date: [Issued Date]
  • Due Date: [Due Date]
  • Outstanding Amount: [Amount Due]

We understand that unforeseen circumstances can sometimes delay payments. However, it is critical for us to maintain a timely payment schedule to continue providing quality services and products.

Payment Details

To facilitate the payment process, we kindly ask you to remit the overdue amount by [New Proposed Deadline]. Payment can be made via [Preferred Payment Method] to the following details:

  • Account Name: [Your Company Name]
  • Bank: [Bank Name]
  • Account Number: [Account Number]

Next Steps

If we do not receive payment by the above-mentioned deadline, we may have to consider additional measures to recover the outstanding amount. These may include interest charges as per our terms and conditions and potential legal actions.

We value our relationship and would prefer to resolve this matter amicably. If you are facing any issues or would like to discuss payment options, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at [Your Contact Information].

Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

[Your Position]

[Your Company Name]

[Your Contact Information]

Step 4: Sending a Letter of Formal Notice (With Poland Demand Letter Template)

Within the Poland debt collection process, the demand letter serves as a pivotal step towards resolving debt amicably. This segment elucidates the significance, preparation, and appropriate execution of a demand letter in Poland, ensuring international creditors navigate this crucial phase with precision and effectiveness.

Understanding Demand Letters

A demand letter (Wezwanie do zapłaty) represents a formal notification sent to a debtor regarding an overdue payment, distinct from a casual payment reminder. Its legal standing within the Polish debt collection framework signifies the creditor's intent to resolve the matter amicably before potentially seeking legal avenues. Compared to a payment reminder, a demand letter carries more formal implications and indicates the creditor's readiness to pursue legal actions if necessary.

Legal Foundations for Demand Letters

In Poland, while there is no stringent legal format for a demand letter, its issuance is covered under the broader civil and commercial laws governing debt collection practices. The letter serves as an official notice, making the debtor aware of their default and the possible legal ramifications for non-compliance.

Preparing a Demand Letter

To ensure your demand letter holds legal validity and systematically communicates your demands, include:

  • The correct identification of both the creditor and debtor.
  • Detailed information on the overdue debt, such as invoice number, amount due, and due date.
  • A clear deadline for payment.
  • A statement of potential legal actions for non-payment.

Ensuring accuracy in these details is crucial to preventing disputes.

Crafting an Effective Demand Letter

The tone and content of your demand letter should balance professionalism with clarity. Guidelines to follow include:

  • Maintaining a respectful yet assertive tone to emphasize the seriousness of the debt.
  • Referencing previous attempts to resolve the issue amicably, building a case for your reasonable efforts.

Delivery Methods and Considerations

Demand letters can be sent via digital means or registered mail, with the latter providing crucial proof of receipt. When selecting a delivery method, consider the debtor's history of responses and the nature of your business relationship.

Actions Following the Demand Letter

If the demand letter is overlooked, creditors may send further reminders, engage in negotiation, or escalate the matter to legal action. It's advisable to consider any partial response or payment proposals critically, as these might offer alternative resolutions.

Documentation and Compliance

Meticulous documentation of all communications related to the demand letter is imperative. This not only aids in maintaining a clear record but also ensures adherence to Poland's legal requirements regarding debt collection practices.

In conclusion, the strategic application of a demand letter significantly influences the debt collection outcome in Poland. By adhering to the outlined practices and legal considerations, creditors can navigate through the pre-legal collection phase with confidence, aiming for a resolution that averts the need for judicial intervention. For international creditors operating in Poland, understanding and utilizing the demand letter correctly is fundamental to successful debt recovery.

Step 5: Calculate Late Payment Fees

In Poland, late payment fees and debt collection fees are clearly regulated to safeguard the interests of both creditors and debtors. These fees aim to compensate creditors for the inconvenience and financial implications of delayed payments while preventing exploitation of debtors through excessive charges.

Detailed Overview of Permissible Fees

Poland's legal framework comprehensively outlines the fees creditors can accrue during the debt collection process. These include court fees, legal representation fees, execution fees, and prescribed compensation for recovery costs.

  • Court Fees: Calculated as a percentage of the claim value or as fixed fees for claims up to 20,000 PLN, capped at 200,000 PLN for larger claims.
  • Legal Representation Fees: These are regulated fees, with minimum rates applied that may increase based on case complexity.
  • Execution Fees: This includes a bailiff's commission (15% of the recovered amount) alongside other execution-related costs.
  • Interest and Compensation: A fixed compensation fee for recovery costs is applicable, which varies (40 EUR, 70 EUR, or 100 EUR) based on the debt amount, aimed to cover the creditor's recovery expenses.

Differences between B2B and B2C transactions are notable, with certain fees and protections specifically designed for consumer transactions.

Fee Type
Applicability (B2B/B2C)
Court Fees
Varies by claim value
Legal Representation Fees
Regulated, varies by case
Execution Fees
15% of recovered + execution costs
Compensation for Recovery Costs
40 EUR, 70 EUR, 100 EUR (based on debt amount)


Let's consider a scenario where a creditor is seeking to add fees to a debt with a principal amount of 5000 EUR. Assuming the case requires legal intervention but is resolved amicably before court enforcement:

  • Legal Representation Fees: Assuming a moderately complex case, fees might be set at approximately 300 EUR.
  • Compensation for Recovery Costs: As the debt amount is 5000 EUR, the compensation fee applicable could be 100 EUR.
  • Total Additional Fees: The total additional charges would therefore be approximately 400 EUR, in addition to the principal amount.

It is important to note that these values are illustrative and could vary based on the specific circumstances of the case and the current regulations.

Regulatory Framework and Limitations on Fees

In Poland, the imposition of debt collection and late payment fees is subject to strict limits to prevent undue hardship on debtors:

  • Fee types and amounts are regulated by Polish law, inclusive of specific acts such as the Act on Court Costs in Civil Cases.
  • Limits and caps are established to ensure fees do not become punitive or excessively burdensome on debtors.
  • Creditors must inform debtors about potential fees transparently, allowing for informed decision-making and dispute resolution where necessary.

It's essential for creditors to adhere to these guidelines, balancing the recovery of debts with fairness and ethical practice.

Step 6: Calculate Interest Rates

In Poland, ensuring due diligence in debt recovery involves not just understanding the principles behind collection but also accurately calculating late payment interest rates. This approach balances protecting creditor rights and debtor welfare. Here, we dive into the intricacies of these rates and guide creditors on legally enforcing late payment interests.

Statutory Interest Rates for Late Payments

Interest rates for late payments in Poland depend on the transaction nature (consumer, B2B, or B2G) and any mutually agreed modifications. Poland's Civil Code and specific laws regulate these rates, ensuring clarity and fairness in debt recovery.

Detailed Overview of Permissible Statutory Interest Rates for Late Payments

The statutory interest rates for late payments vary with the debtor type and agreement specifics. As of late 2023 and early 2024, here's a summary:

  • General Transactions: 11.25% per annum
  • B2B Transactions: 15.75% per annum (excluding public entities acting as healthcare providers)
  • B2G (Healthcare Providers): 13.75% per annum

These rates are calculated over the base sum, incorporating the National Bank of Poland's (NBP) reference rate plus an additional percentage, tailored to the transaction type. For contracts, adjustments to these rates are permissible, provided they don't exceed twice the statutory interest rate for delays.

Example: Calculating Interest for B2B Transactions

Consider a scenario where a business owes €5000 in delayed payments. Given the statutory rate for B2B transactions is 15.75% per annum, the interest calculation (assuming a complete year of delay) would be:

Interest = Principal Amount x (Interest Rate / 100) = €5000 x (15.75 / 100) = €787.50

Thus, for a year's delay on a €5000 debt, a business creditor could add €787.50 as interest to the principal amount.

Regulatory Framework and Limitations on Interests

While flexibility exists in adjusting rates through mutual agreement, a cap is set at twice the statutory rate. This safeguard prevents unreasonable interest burdens on debtors. The governing legal framework—comprising the Civil Code and the Act on Counteracting Excessive Delays in Commercial Transactions—mandates adherence to these rates and caps, ensuring ethical debt recovery practices.

Debt collection in Poland respects both creditor rights and debtor welfare, with the legal system providing a balanced and transparent framework for interest on late payments. Debitura's expertise underscores the importance of compliance and ethical practice in navigating these regulations effectively.

Step 7: Crafting a Payment Agreement to Resolve Debt

While navigating through the early phases of debt collection, adding an option for a payment plan can turn potential conflicts into agreeable solutions. This step is crucial in the amicable debt collection process in Poland, helping both parties reach a resolution without delving into more strenuous legal processes. Let’s explore why offering a payment plan can be favourable, how to legally formalize such an arrangement, and provide you with a compliant sample of a payment arrangement.

Formalities: Securing a Legally Viable Payment Plan

To ensure a payment plan isn’t just a verbal agreement prone to misunderstandings or disputes, it's vital to formalize it. This acknowledgment effectively resets the statute of limitations for the debt under Polish law, giving creditors a renewed timeframe for collection if the agreement isn’t upheld.

Best practices for formalizing a payment plan include:

  • Ensuring the agreement details the total debt amount, the installment sizes, and the payment schedule.
  • Explicitly stating the interest rates applied, if any, and any additional costs.
  • Specifying the legal consequences for missing payments or breaching the agreement.
  • Getting a written acknowledgment from the debtor that they understand the terms and confirm the debt.

Such a document not only provides a clear framework for debt repayment but also serves as a solid proof of agreement, crucial for potential legal enforcement.

Sample Payment Arrangement Compliant with Polish Law

Below is a sample of a payment arrangement that aligns with Polish law and embodies best practices:

Payment Arrangement Agreement

This Payment Arrangement Agreement ("Agreement") is made on [Date], between [Creditor’s Name], henceforth referred to as "Creditor," and [Debtor’s Name], henceforth referred to as "Debtor". The parties agree as follows:

  • Debt Acknowledgment: Debtor acknowledges owing Creditor a total debt of [Total Debt Amount] as of [Date], inclusive of any applicable interest and collection costs.
  • Payment Plan: Debtor agrees to repay the acknowledged debt in [Number of Installments] monthly installments of [Installment Amount] each, beginning on [Start Date] and ending on [End Date].
  • Interest and Additional Costs: [Specify any interest rates and additional costs applied to the installment plan. If none, state so explicitly.]
  • Legal Consequences: Failure to comply with this Agreement may result in [specify consequences, e.g., legal action for debt collection].
  • Acknowledgment of Terms: Debtor acknowledges they have read, understood, and agreed to the terms of this Agreement, confirming the existence and amount of the debt.



[Creditor’s Name]


 [Debtor’s Name]

This agreement stands as a testament to the diligence required in formalizing a payment arrangement, ensuring both parties are aligned and legal protections are in place.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Free Demand Letter Template

Poland Demand Letter Template

This template is designed to help international creditors draft a demand letter that is in line with Polish law and best practices. Please customize the details based on your specific situation and the debtor's information.

Demand Letter for Late Payment

Date: [Insert Date]


[Debtor’s Full Name or Company Name]


[City, Zip Code]



[Creditor’s Full Name or Company Name]


[City, Zip Code]


Subject: Demand for Payment

Dear [Debtor’s Name or Company Representative],

We write to you concerning the following invoice(s) which, as of the date of this letter, remain unpaid:

  • Invoice Number: [Insert Invoice Number(s)]
  • Invoice Date: [Insert Invoice Date(s)]
  • Amount Due: [Insert Amount Due]
  • Due Date: [Insert Due Date]

Despite our previous correspondence and your assurances, we have not received payment or an acceptable proposal for payment of the above amount. Please be advised that under Polish law, failure to settle this debt could result in further legal actions including, but not limited to, court proceedings and additional costs.

Consequently, we hereby demand full payment of the aforementioned amount within [Insert Number of Days, Recommend 14-30 Days] days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to do so will compel us to initiate legal proceedings against you to recover the debt without further notice. These actions may include reporting your non-payment to credit bureaus and engaging in judicial collection processes, which may incur additional costs and fees for which you will be liable.

To avoid any legal actions, please make the payment payable to [Creditor’s Name or Company Name] to the following account:

  • Bank Name: [Insert Bank Name]
  • Account Number: [Insert Account Number]

If you have already made this payment, we thank you and kindly ask you to disregard this letter. Otherwise, we request the immediate settlement of your account to prevent any further action.

In case you are experiencing financial difficulties and wish to discuss a potential payment plan, please contact us directly at [Insert Contact Information] at your earliest convenience.

Your prompt attention to this matter is highly appreciated.


[Your Name or Company Representative’s Name]

[Your Position or Department]

[Your Contact Information]

Enclosures: Copies of relevant invoices and previous correspondence

Implementing Retention of Title and Right of Reclamation in Poland for Outstanding Debts

Poland's regulations on retention of title (RoT) and right of reclamation (RoR) provide pivotal legal frameworks for creditors, particularly for international trade. These legal constructs are designed to safeguard sellers by allowing them to retain ownership of goods until full payment is secured, and reclaim goods if necessary. Understanding and leveraging these laws can significantly mitigate financial risks related to unpaid goods.

Retention of Title in Poland

The concept of retention of title allows a seller to maintain legal ownership of the goods sold until the buyer has fully paid for them. This legal provision is particularly beneficial in commercial transactions, offering a layer of security for creditors against buyer insolvency or payment defaults.

In Poland, RoT is explicitly acknowledged and enforceable, but its effectiveness is contingent on proper documentation. A crucial requirement is that the agreement stipulating RoT must be in writing, clearly stating that ownership does not transfer to the buyer until complete payment. The agreement's effectiveness against third-party creditors can be further reinforced through notarization or other official recognition, thereby ensuring a certain date is attributed to the document.

Moreover, in the context of the buyer's insolvency or liquidation, the seller, leveraging the RoT clause, can seek to reclaim either the goods or their value from the bankruptcy estate. This is contingent on the criteria that the RoT agreement was properly documented and enforceable at the time of bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings.

Right of Reclamation in Poland

The right of reclamation empowers sellers to reclaim goods delivered to a buyer if payment has not been received. In Poland, this right extends to cases where goods are left outside the country's current borders, primarily due to historical displacements. Specifically, the Act of July 8, 2005, outlines the principles for compensating individuals or entities that have suffered losses due to properties being left outside Poland's borders as a result of war or expulsion. Although focused on real estate, these principles reinforce the broader legal expectation that rightful owners may seek compensation or reclamation for unjustly held or unpaid properties.

For the reclamation of goods based on an unpaid scenario under commercial transactions, it is essential, just like with RoT, that there exists a written agreement clearly indicating the conditions under which the goods can be reclaimed. Legal proceedings might be necessary to enforce this right if the buyer defaults on payment, making the explicit agreement on RoR a powerful tool for creditors.

Practical Tip for Businesses

To maximize the benefits of retention of title and right of reclamation in Poland, businesses should meticulously draft their terms of service or contracts. Clauses should be clear, unequivocal, and document the conditions under which RoT and RoR apply. Including specific provisions for dispute resolution and agreeing on jurisdiction for legal proceedings can further strengthen these clauses. This not only bolsters the enforceability of RoT and RoR clauses but also provides a clear pathway for recourse in case of non-payment. A well-documented agreement is a creditor's staunchest ally in safeguarding against financial risks in trade transactions.

Get started with
amicable debt collection

Upload your claim and get started with our 100% no-cure-no-pay collection solution.

100% free
Get the best price
Fast collection process
High recovery rate
Risk free
Upload claim!

Get started with amicable collection. 100% risk-free!
100% No Cure, No Pay

Find a Debt Collection Lawyer

Finding the right lawyer for judicial debt collection is crucial. Debitura offers a streamlined 'Find a Lawyer' service, drawing from our network of 500+ local attorneys across the globe. Describe your needs and quickly get tailored proposals from up to three top lawyers.

Your Benefits at a Glance:

  • Verified Lawyers: Access vetted professionals for reliable representation.
  • Free Matching & Quotes: Get matched and receive quotes with no hidden fees.
  • Competitive Rates: Benefit from fair, negotiated pricing for quality services.

Explore the profiles of our esteemed local partners below and take the first step towards securing your legal advantage with Debitura.

Dolna 10 lok. 2, 00-774, Warsaw, Poland
FGGK Freliszka Gosk-Grodzka Karwowski Adwokaci i Radcowie Prawni

FGGK - Law Office in Poland, Business lawyers and attorneys; Over 20 years of experience; Professional lawyers, registered at the Bar Association of Warsaw.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
ul. Adama Branickiego 15, (02-972) Warsaw
BRILLAW Kancelaria Radcow Prawnych Mikulski & Partners

BRILLAW by Mikulski & Partners is not just a company, it is primarily a team. A team of a dozen experienced lawyers and attorneys-at-law perfectly prepared to provide comprehensive legal services for every type of business activity. Since 2000, we have been providing legal services to Polish and foreign entrepreneurs with particular emphasis on the infrastructure, financial and industrial sectors.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
pl. Porozumienia Gdańskiego 1/21, 80-864 Gdańsk
Kancelaria Adwokacka Adwokat Dawid Suszyński

Our legal firm is your one-stop shop for all of your attorney needs - whether you require a lawyer, attorney at law, barrister (advocate), or solicitor. You can trust our experienced and knowledgeable team to provide the highest quality services that meet and exceed expectations. Our headquarters are based in Gdansk, yet we proudly serve clients across Poland with court cases as needed.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
ul. Kotlarska 6/3, 31-539 Krakow
Kancelaria Adwokacka Maciej Bartnik

A law firm with offices in Cracov and Warsaw, specializing in legal help for foreigners. We have over ten years experience in debt colecting and we provide full service in English.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
Jana Sobieskiego 10/14 street, 31-136 Kraków, POLAND
Tomasz Staszak Kancelaria Adwokacka

The Law Office of Advocate Tomasz Staszak was established to provide comprehensive legal services to entrepreneurs.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego Maciej Mierecki

Expert in cross-border debt collection and litigation, Kancelaria Radcy Prawnego Maciej Mierecki is a Cracow-based law firm. Multilingual, personalized, and result-oriented legal assistance to individuals and business entities across Poland, setting quality before quantity since 2021.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Law firm
ICG sc - International Consulting Group

Experience international debt recovery like never before with ICG sc - the go-to Debt Collection Agency Glogow and beyond. Thriving since 2002, our No Win – No Fee policy, and first-stage success rate of 70% make us the preferred choice in over 50 countries.

Legal collection
Debt enforcement
Debt collection agency

Debt Enforcement in Poland

Debt enforcement is a critical step in debt recovery, providing a legal framework to secure payments. This section outlines the process and its importance in Poland.

Debt Enforcement - Key Takeways
  • Court Order: A court order is mandatory for debt enforcement in Poland.
  • Bailiff's Role: Bailiffs enforce debts, requiring a valid execution title for initiation.
  • Execution Title: A court judgment, settlement, or notarial deed with enforcement clause is needed.
  • Execution Methods: Seizure of property, garnishing wages, and bank accounts are key methods.
  • Debtor Protections: Certain personal items and income levels are protected from seizure.
  • Costs: Debtors bear the costs of execution, including bailiff fees.
  • Bailiff Regulations: The "Act on Bailiffs" governs bailiff operations and activities in Poland.
  • Financial Considerations for Creditors: Weighing ROI, including court and bailiff fees, is vital.
  • Asset Tracing: Economic intelligence is key to identifying hidden debtor assets.
  • Timeframe: Debt enforcement duration varies, influenced by case complexity and enforcement efficiency.
  • Asset Seizure: Polish law regulates the seizure of assets, protecting certain debtor rights.
  • Salary Attachments: Governed by legal limits, ensuring debtors maintain a basic living standard.

The Role of Bailiffs in Debt Enforcement

Based on the intricacies of Polish law, bailiffs serve as critical figures in the debt enforcement process, bridging the divide between legal judgment and actual debt recovery. Their wide-ranging responsibilities and powers are outlined carefully to balance debtor protections with creditor rights.

  • Asset Seizure: Bailiffs are authorized to seize both movable and immovable assets of the debtor, including but not limited to bank accounts, salaries, and properties. These actions are designed to satisfy the debt owed to creditors. 
  • Debtor Interaction: The bailiff’s role extends beyond mere asset seizure; they also act as avenues for communication, conveying demands for payment directly to debtors.
  • Conducting Auctions: To liquidate seized assets and recover owed amounts, bailiffs also oversee the auction process.
  • Debtor Protections: Despite their authoritative functions, bailiffs must respect debtor rights, ensuring essential living needs are not compromised. For instance, certain personal belongings and minimum income levels are protected against seizure.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Operating under strict regulations, bailiffs must balance assertive debt recovery with ethical standards, ensuring fair treatment for all involved parties.

The Process of Debt Enforcement

To initiate the debt enforcement process in Poland, several steps are meticulously followed, ensuring the rights of all parties are upheld within a comprehensive legal framework.

  1. Obtaining Execution Title: The process begins with securing a valid execution title; this can be a court judgment, settlement, or a notarial deed with an enforcement clause.
  2. Application Submission: With an execution title in hand, creditors apply for execution with a court-appointed bailiff, marking the formal start of the execution process. Asset Evaluation: The bailiff then assesses the debtor's assets, identifying viable targets for recovery.
  3. Execution of Assets: The bailiff may seize assets, garnish wages, or employ other methods to satisfy the debt, adhering to legal protections for the debtor.
  4. Resolution: The process concludes with the successful recovery of debt or a legal determination that the debtor’s assets are insufficient.

Legal Framework for Bailiff Operations and Debt Enforcement

Poland's legal system prescribes a rigid framework governing bailiff operations and the entirety of the debt enforcement process, ensuring transparency, fairness, and efficiency. This framework comprises several laws and regulations aimed at protecting the interests of all parties.

  • Bailiff Regulations: Laws such as the "Act on Bailiffs" delineate the oversight and operational procedures for bailiffs, fortifying their role within the legal system. Protection of Debtors: Polish law ensures the protection of debtors during the execution process, forbidding the seizure of essential living needs and income below a subsistence level.
  • Legal Dispute Resolution: In instances of discrepancies or disputes concerning the execution process, parties can seek redress through the courts, fostering an environment of legal recourse and fairness.

Pre-Enforcement Actions

Preparing for debt enforcement in Poland requires a systematic approach, ensuring all legal avenues are explored before commencing enforcement actions. These preparatory steps serve as the groundwork for smooth and effective debt recovery.

  1. Voluntary Settlement Attempts: Prior to legal action, efforts are made to amicably settle the debt, saving both time and resources.
  2. Legal Action Decision: If voluntary repayment fails, legal consultation determines the viability of proceeding with enforcement, taking into account the debtor's financial status and assets. 
  3. Lawsuit Preparation: Crucial documents are prepared, and evidence of the debt compiled, ahead of filing a lawsuit.
  4. Court Proceedings: The process transitions to the courts, awaiting a judgment that could lead to the issuance of an execution title.

With a structured and informed approach, guided by Debitura’s decade-long expertise in Poland, creditors can navigate the complexities of debt enforcement, optimizing their recovery strategies while adhering to local legal standards.

Explore the cost and time frame for debt enforcement
Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore asset seizure and salary attachment options

Seizure of Assets in Poland 

In the realm of debt collection, the seizure of assets is a critical mechanism that assists creditors in recovering outstanding debts from defaulting debtors. This process entails legally obtaining and selling the debtor's property to satisfy the debt obligations. Here's what you need to know:

  • Meaning and Context: The seizure of assets refers to the legal process whereby a bailiff takes control of a debtor's assets to repay outstanding debts. This course of action follows after obtaining a valid execution title and is deemed necessary when other debt recovery methods have been exhausted.
  • When to Use: Typically employed as a last resort, asset seizure is used when negotiations, settlement attempts, and voluntary payment arrangements have failed to result in debt repayment.
  • Advantages: This approach ensures creditors recover a portion, if not all, of the owed amount, thereby providing a strong deterrent against willful defaulting on debits. It also sends a signal about the seriousness of meeting financial commitments.
  • Assets Eligible for Seizure: Assets that can be seized include movable and immovable property, vehicles, stocks, and shares, and in some instances, intangible assets like patents or copyrights. However, personal belongings necessary for basic living and a minimum income level are protected under Polish law.
  • Process Explained: Upon acquiring an enforcement order, the creditor submits an application for execution to a bailiff, who then proceeds to notify the debtor, appraise and seize the assets, before auctioning them off to the highest bidder. The generated funds are used to settle the debt.

Garnishment Rights and Salary Attachments in Poland 

Garnishment and salary attachments are vital tools in debt enforcement, allowing creditors to recover debts by directly obtaining a portion of the debtor's earnings or bank account funds. Let’s delve into the nuances:

  • Meaning and Context: Garnishment refers to a court-ordered process where a debtor's employer is directed to withhold part of the debtor's earnings for debt repayment. Similarly, salary attachments entail the direct withdrawal of funds from a debtor's bank account. Both mechanisms are safeguarded by Polish law to balance debt recovery and debtor protection.
  • When to Use: These methods are used when debtors have a consistent source of income but have been unwilling or unable to make payments towards their debts.
  • Advantages: These processes ensure steady debt recovery, offer a less invasive alternative to asset seizure, and provide a continuous payment structure that is less likely to financially destabilize the debtor.
  • Debtor Protection: Polish law limits the portion of earnings that can be garnished to protect the debtor’s ability to maintain basic living standards. Exemptions include a set minimum subsistence level income and certain personal allowances.
  • Process Explained: Following the court's garnishment order, the employer is legally bound to deduct the specified amount from the debtor's salary and transfer it to the creditor. The process for salary attachments is similar but applies to funds in the debtor's bank account. This procedure continues until the debt is fully settled.

Debitura, with its decade-long experience in international debt collection and deep understanding of Polish debt enforcement laws and procedures, stands as a beacon of trust and expertise for creditors navigating these complex waters. For more insights and assistance, feel free to reach out to our team.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Get started with debt enforcement. Create a free profile, and get 3 quotes from local lawyers.

Get started with
debt enforcement

Upload your claim and get 3 FREE quotes from our local collection partners.

100% free
Get the best price
Fast collection process
High recovery rate
Risk free
Upload claim!

Insolvency Proceedings in Poland: A Creditor's Guide

Insolvency and bankruptcy in Poland are crucial mechanisms for debt recovery, offering structured legal pathways for creditors. This section outlines key considerations and strategies for effectively navigating insolvency proceedings.

Insolvency Proceedings - Key Takeways
  • Legal Framework: Governed by the Bankruptcy Law Act of February 28, 2003, offering structured debt recovery paths.
  • Debt Recovery Tool: Utilized strategically for recovering debts, with recent legal changes increasing accessibility.
  • Filing Conditions: Applicable for entities unable to meet obligations for over three months, demonstrating insolvency.
  • Priority Rules: Clearly defined, determining the order of claim satisfaction and affecting debt recovery chances.
  • Bankruptcy Costs: Involves court fees, legal representation costs, and trustee remuneration, vary based on case complexity.
  • Timeframe Constraints: Varying duration influenced by the debtor's financial situation and procedural complexities.
  • Recovery Prospects: While full satisfaction is rare, structured distribution plans aim to facilitate some level of repayment.
  • Petition Process: Involves submitting a formal petition followed by a court hearing to assess insolvency.
  • Secured vs. Unsecured: Distinct privileges exist, with secured creditors generally granted precedence in claim recovery.
  • Post-Bankruptcy Scenarios: Options for creditors to maximize recovery include active participation and prompt claim filing.
  • Required Documentation: Submission of documented claims is essential for participation in the distribution plan.
  • Judicial Review: Creditors possess rights for objection, appeal, and impacting the bankruptcy proceedings.

The Legal Framework for Insolvency Procedures

The Bankruptcy Law Act of February 28, 2003, governs insolvency procedures in Poland, covering both individual and business entities. It's designed to orderly distribute the debtor's assets among creditors and, where possible, rehabilitate financially distressed businesses.

  • Types of Proceedings: Insolvency can lead to liquidation (bankruptcy) or restructuring based on the debtor's condition and prospects for recovery.
  • Thresholds: Insolvency is declared when a debtor fails to meet due obligations for more than three months or when liabilities exceed assets.
  • Creditor Initiatives: Creditors can instigate insolvency proceedings by proving the debtor's insolvency, potentially using it as a strategy for debt recovery.

Creditor's Rights and Priorities in Insolvency Proceedings

In insolvency proceedings, the prioritization of claims is critical to the recovery process for creditors.

  • Secured vs. Unsecured Creditors: Secured creditors have claims satisfied first from the sale of collateral, while unsecured creditors are paid from remaining assets.
  • Claim Registration: Creditors must timely register their claims to participate in the distribution of the insolvency estate.
  • Priority Order: Claims are ranked with wages, taxes, and secured debts being satisfied first.

Strategies such as claim enforcement and active participation in proceedings can maximize recovery chances.

Maximizing Recovery from Insolvent Estates

Efficacious strategies in debt recovery through insolvency include:

  • Early identification of insolvency signs in debtors and prompt claim filing.
  • Securing assets or obtaining guarantees before formal insolvency proceedings.
  • Active involvement in the insolvency process, including attending creditors’ meetings.

The Cost and Duration of Insolvency Proceedings

The insolvency process involves various fees and takes time, affecting the overall recovery for creditors.

  • Costs: Includes court fees, trustee remuneration, and attorney fees. Court filing fees start at 30 PLN for individuals and 1000 PLN for businesses.
  • Duration: The length of proceedings can vary, typically spanning from a few months to several years, depending on the complexity.
  • State Treasury Support: For insolvent debtors without sufficient assets, costs are temporarily covered by the State Treasury.

Efficient management and participation in proceedings can mitigate some of these costs and time delays for creditors.

Source: LEX - Bankruptcy Law Act

Explore our step-by-step guide for insolvency proceedings

Step-by-Step Guide for Debt Recovery via Insolvency in Poland

When facing non-payment issues in Poland, initiating bankruptcy proceedings can be a strategic approach for creditors to recover their claims. This step-by-step guide, meticulously designed and based on Debitura’s decade of experience in debt collection, provides creditors with a detailed pathway to navigate the complexity of insolvency proceedings. Follow these steps to maximize your chances of recovering your claim through insolvency proceedings, showcasing an understanding of the legal processes and best practices in Poland.

Step 1: Check the Conditions for Filing for Bankruptcy

Before initiating bankruptcy proceedings against your debtor, it is crucial to ensure that they meet the conditions for filing. In Poland, a debtor is considered eligible for bankruptcy if they have been insolvent for more than three months. Insolvency implies the inability to fulfill financial obligations as they come due. Additionally, for business entities, insolvency is also recognized if their liabilities exceed their assets for more than 24 months. Confirming these conditions is the first step in the bankruptcy process.

Step 2: Filing a Bankruptcy Petition

Once the conditions for bankruptcy are confirmed, the next step is to file a bankruptcy petition. The petition should be directed to the competent court. In Poland, the court fee for filing a bankruptcy petition is relatively low, being 30 PLN for individuals, with a significant deposit required for covering the costs of restructuring proceedings - 5370.64 PLN. The petition must include all relevant documentation of the debtor’s financial situation, claims, and evidence of insolvency.

Step 3: Notice of the Hearing

After filing the petition, the court assesses the application and schedules a hearing. The court may also take temporary measures to secure the debtor’s assets, including appointing a temporary supervisor or imposing compulsory administration. Creditors and the debtor are notified of the date and details of the hearing. It’s imperative for creditors to stay informed and prepared for the hearing date to present their case effectively.

Step 4: Your Debtor Can Object to Your Application (Defence)

The debtor is given an opportunity to respond to the bankruptcy petition. They can file an objection to your claim, disputing the debt or presenting their defence against the insolvency proceedings. This stage is critical for creditors, as they must be prepared to counter the debtor’s defences effectively. Gathering all necessary documents and evidence supporting the claim is crucial for avoiding delays or dismissal of the bankruptcy petition

Stay tuned for the next steps in this guide, covering the hearing, decision-making process, opposition, appeal, and judicial review, as well as post-bankruptcy scenarios for creditors. Each step is designed to provide creditors with the necessary information to navigate the complex bankruptcy proceedings in Poland. Understanding these procedures can significantly enhance your strategy for debt recovery through insolvency.

Remember, while this guide offers a comprehensive overview, professional advice tailored to your specific case is highly recommended for optimal results. Debitura, with our rich experience in the field, is ready to assist in navigating the intricacies of debt collection in Poland.

Step 5: The Hearing

After the submission of the bankruptcy petition and any objections by the debtor, the next crucial stage is the hearing. This is a formal court session, pivotal to the bankruptcy process where the merits of the bankruptcy petition are reviewed. Here’s what creditors need to know to navigate this phase successfully:

  • Notification of Schedule: The court notifies all involved parties of the hearing date. Creditors must remain vigilant to stay updated on this schedule.
  • Preparation: It's imperative for creditors to thoroughly prepare for the hearing. This means organizing all necessary documents, evidence supporting the claim, and any legal arguments that highlight the legitimacy of the bankruptcy petition.
  • Representation: Creditors have the option to represent themselves or, more wisely, to be represented by a legal professional. Given the complex nature of bankruptcy hearings, having experienced legal counsel is invaluable.
  • Execution of Hearing: During the hearing, the court examines the evidence, hears arguments from both the petitioner (creditor) and the debtor, if present. The focus is on verifying the insolvency status of the debtor and the legitimacy of the claims.
  • Role of the Judge: The judge plays a central role, guiding the proceedings, and ensuring that all legal standards are met. The judge's aim is to achieve a fair assessment of the case based on the evidence and arguments presented.

Outcome: The conclusion of the hearing can significantly influence the direction of the bankruptcy process. Successful arguments can lead to a favorable ruling for the creditor, moving the case closer to declaring the debtor bankrupt.

Understanding the importance of the hearing and ensuring diligent preparation can have a profound impact on the outcome of the bankruptcy process. Creditors are encouraged to engage with this phase proactively, ensuring all paperwork and legal arguments are in perfect order.

Step 6: Decision

After the hearing concludes, the next step is the court’s decision. It’s a crucial moment that determines whether bankruptcy proceedings will proceed. Here's an outline of what creditors can expect:

  • Announcement: The decision is typically announced at the end of the hearing or shortly after. Creditors should stay informed about the timing.
  • Possible Outcomes: The court can either accept or reject the bankruptcy petition. Acceptance moves the proceedings to the next phase, while rejection might require reevaluation of the case or seeking alternative recovery methods.
  • Insolvency Declaration: If the court accepts the petition, the debtor is formally declared insolvent. This declaration initiates the next steps in asset liquidation and claims satisfaction.
  • Publication: The decision, particularly in cases of acceptance, is published in official registers such as the Monitor Sądowy i Gospodarczy. This ensures transparency and informs potential claimants.
  • Notifications: Creditors are notified about the court’s decision, which is essential for planning next steps or preparing for appeals, if necessary.

The court’s decision marks a defining point in the bankruptcy process. Creditors should be prepared for all outcomes and understand the implications of the decision for their recovery efforts.

Step 7: Opposition, Appeal, and Judicial Review

Not all decisions go unchallenged. Here’s how opposition, appeal, and judicial review fit into the bankruptcy process:

  • Grounds for Appeal: Both the debtor and creditors can appeal the court’s decision if they believe it was incorrect. Grounds for appeal include procedural mistakes or misinterpretation of the law.
  • Appeal Process: Appealing a decision requires submitting an official appeal within a specified time frame, usually within 14 days from the decision announcement. Precise, factual, and legal grounds must support the appeal.
  • Judicial Review: A higher court reviews the appeal, examining the adherence to legal standards and the accuracy of the lower court’s decision. This process may take several months.
  • Outcome of Appeal: The appellate court may uphold the original decision, reverse it, or remand the case for further proceedings. Each of these outcomes has implications for the bankruptcy process and debt recovery efforts.

Understanding the appeal and judicial review process is essential for creditors seeking to maximize their chances of recovery. It offers another layer of legal recourse in cases of unfavorable decisions.

Step 8: Post-Bankruptcy Scenarios for Creditors

Finally, understanding the post-bankruptcy scenarios is key for creditors aiming to recover their dues. Here’s what typically follows after bankruptcy declaration:

  • Claims Submission: Creditors must submit their claims within the stipulated time frame to partake in the distribution of the debtor's estate.
  • Assets Liquidation: The trustee oversees the liquidation of the debtor’s assets. The aim is to convert assets into cash for distribution among creditors.
  • Distribution of Proceeds: Proceeds from the liquidation are distributed to creditors according to the priority rules set by law. This process can be protracted, depending on the complex nature of the estate.
  • Discharge of Debtor: In some cases, the debtor may be discharged from remaining debts after the bankruptcy estate is liquidated and distributed. This depends on the type of bankruptcy and the court’s decisions.

Understanding these post-bankruptcy scenarios can help creditors set realistic expectations and plan their strategies accordingly. It’s important to actively engage in the process, ensuring proper submission of claims and monitoring the liquidation process.

Implementing strategic and informed steps throughout the bankruptcy process enhances the likelihood of debt recovery. By understanding and adhering to the legal framework, creditors can navigate this complex landscape more effectively, maximizing their chances of recouping investments.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Recovery of International Debt in Poland

In an era of borderless commerce, businesses frequently extend their operations beyond their home countries, leading to dealings with international partners. However, this global expansion comes with its own set of challenges, particularly when it comes to debt recovery across national boundaries. For creditors located outside of Poland seeking to recover their claims, navigating the complexities of the Polish legal and regulatory landscape can be daunting. Hiring a local debt collection agency like Debitura, armed with 10 years of experience and strong partnerships with local attorneys, offers a wise solution. Debitura's deep understanding of the Polish market dynamics, culture, and laws ensures effective and efficient debt recovery for international creditors.

Collecting cross border claims - Key Takeways
  • Legal Framework: Poland's unique legal procedures make local expertise crucial.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Understanding Polish business etiquette enhances collection success.
  • Language Proficiency: Communication in Polish increases effectiveness and reduces misunderstandings.
  • European Payment Orders: Simplify and accelerate the recovery of uncontested cross-border debts.
  • Data Protection Compliance: Adhering to GDPR is mandatory for handling debtor's information.
  • Consumer Protection: Polish law includes strong consumer protections affecting debt collection practices.
  • Regulatory Environment: Familiarity with the Polish Financial Supervision Authority's regulations is important.
  • International Agreements: Poland is party to several treaties that impact debt collection processes.
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation and arbitration can be effective, cost-efficient methods.
  • Litigation: When necessary, pursuing legal action requires navigating Poland's court system.
  • Debt Enforcement: Post-judgment enforcement mechanisms are well-defined but complex.
  • Local Partnerships: Collaborating with local entities like Debitura optimizes collection outcomes.
Explore cross border collection options

Challenges for International Creditors Recovering Debt in Poland

Recovering debt from international traders can be an intricate process in Poland, similar to other areas of the world, due to various factors such as:

  • Cultural and Language Barriers: Different business practices and languages can lead to misinterpretation of contracts or delays in communication.
  • Varied Legal Systems: Poland has its own legal frameworks and procedures for debt collection that international creditors must navigate, which might be vastly different from those in their home countries.
  • Enforcement Complications: Even after securing a judgment, the actual enforcement of debt collection in Poland could pose another layer of complexity, requiring specific procedural adherence.

Debitura’s decade-long experience provides us with the expertise to seamlessly navigate these challenges, ensuring the most efficient recovery process for our clients.

EU Wide Regulation - The European Late Payment Directive in Poland

The European Late Payment Directive, designed to fight the late payment in commercial transactions, is fully implemented in Poland. This directive's key features in Poland include:

  • Strict payment deadlines: Payments in B2B transactions must be made within 60 days unless agreed otherwise.
  • Interest and compensation: Creditors can charge interest on late payments and are entitled to compensation for recovery costs, fostering a culture of prompt payments.

The implementation of this directive in Poland serves as a crucial tool for international creditors in securing timely payments.

Enforcing Cross-Border Claims in Poland via the European Enforcement Order (EEO)

For uncontested claims, the European Enforcement Order (EEO) facilitates the enforcement of judgments across EU states without the need for a declaration of enforceability. In Poland, the EEO enables:

  • Automatic recognition of judgments obtained in one EU Member State by Polish courts.
  • No requirement for a review of substance, simplifying and expediting the enforcement process.

The EEO streamlines debt recovery for international creditors by removing procedural barriers to enforcement in Poland.

Recover Uncontested Monetary Cross-Border Claims via European Order for Payment (EOP)

The European Order for Payment (EOP) procedure allows creditors to recover uncontested debts efficiently. In Poland, the EOP:

  • Applies to cross-border financial claims that are not disputed by the debtor.
  • Utilizes a standard form, making it simpler to initiate.
  • Grants automatic recognition and enforcement across the EU, including Poland, without further procedures.

With the EOP, creditors have a straightforward mechanism at their disposal to recover debts from Polish debtors without entering lengthy legal battles.

Resolve Minor Cross-Border Disputes via the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP)

The European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) offers an effective avenue for resolving cross-border disputes involving claims up to €5,000 within the EU efficiently. In Poland, ESCP provides:

  • A simplified process handled mainly in writing, reducing the need for physical court appearances.
  • Automatic recognition and enforcement of decisions in Poland, creating a smooth process for international creditors.

The ESCP empowers creditors with an expeditious and cost-effective tool to resolve small disputes in Poland and maintain their business fluidity.

Freeze Poland Debtors' Assets via the European Account Preservation Order (EAPO)

The European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) assists creditors in securing their claims by freezing the debtor’s bank assets across the EU, effectively extending to Poland. Key aspects include:

  • The ability for creditors to prevent debtors from moving assets abroad, securing the chances of recovery.
  • Expediency and surprise factor, as the EAPO can be issued without the debtor’s prior knowledge.

By utilizing the EAPO, creditors can ensure that their claims are safeguarded and have a higher likelihood of successful recovery in Poland.

Throughout, Debitura’s expertise shines as we navigate the intricacies of international debt collection in Poland, providing unparalleled support and advice to bolster your debt recovery strategies efficiently and ethically.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Country Risk Rating

Doing Business in Poland: Understanding Local Payment Behaviors, Corporate Landscape, and Risks

Entering the Polish market offers exciting opportunities but comes with specific challenges and risks. For international creditors, understanding the nuances of Poland's business environment, including local payment behaviors, corporate structures, and various risk factors, is crucial for operational success. This section outlines key insights to navigate these waters confidently.

Our analysis concludes that the risk of doing business in Poland is medium-low. Based on this medium-low score, we recommend being careful providing credit and considering charging upfront payment or using credit insurance when trading if you don't know the customer in Poland well. If possible, provide a short credit period or even better upfront payment. The medium-low risk score is based on the following factors:

Low risk
Medium-low risk
Medium risk
Medium-high risk
High risk
Low risk
Medium-low risk
Medium risk
Medium-high risk
High risk
Low risk
Medium-low risk
Medium risk
Medium-high risk
High risk
Low risk
Medium-low risk
Medium risk
Medium-high risk
High risk
Low risk
Medium-low risk
Medium risk
Medium-high risk
High risk
Key Takeways
  • Average DSO: The average Days Sales Outstanding reflects the efficiency of receivables management.
  • Bad Debt Relief: A legal mechanism allowing VAT taxpayers to recover VAT on uncollected receivables under certain conditions.
  • Corporate Structures: A range of organizational structures is observed within Polish companies, impacting operational dynamics.
  • Efficient Collection Strategies: Critical for optimizing DSO and maintaining healthy cash flows in Poland.
  • Technological Solutions: Play a crucial role in optimizing DSO by improving invoice accuracy and enabling faster billing processes.
  • Flat to Divisional Corporate Hierarchy: From flat structures in small entities to complex divisional hierarchies in large corporations.
  • Critical Corporate Roles: Including CEO, CFO, CMO, and various specialized positions critical for business operations.
  • VAT Recovery on Bad Debts: Possible for businesses under specific conditions, enhancing financial resilience.
  • Legal Measures for Creditors: Available in case of payment delays and bad debts, offering some protection.
  • Credit Insurance Role: Can mitigate the impact of bad debts, though specifics within Poland are less clear.
  • Payment Behavior Challenges: Addressed through bad debt relief and other mechanisms to support businesses.
  • Organizational and Legal Challenges: Requires continuous navigation and adaptation for successful business operations in Poland.
Explore Payment Trends and DSO

Understanding DSO and Payment Behavior in Poland

In the complex landscape of international trade, Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) emerges as a critical metric for assessing a company's financial health, especially in diverse markets like Poland. The Atradius Payment Practices Barometer 2023 sheds light on Poland's shifting payment practices in response to macroeconomic challenges. With inflation and strict monetary policies influencing business decisions, a cautious approach towards credit transactions has become prevalent. As a result, sales transacted on credit now represent 46% of all B2B sales.

Despite attempts to adapt, Polish companies face an "alarming trend" of increasing overdue B2B invoices—28% over the past year, the highest among Eastern European markets surveyed. This has severely impacted cash flows, with half of the B2B sales on credit remaining unpaid by the due date. Consequently, the average waiting period for B2B payment has now reached 86 days from invoicing, starkly contrasting with the 45 days typically allotted for settlement.

Identifying Challenges:

  • Late Payment Surge: A 28% increase in overdue invoices exacerbates cash flow issues, reflecting a broader trend of delayed payments in the Polish market.
  • Extended DSO Figures: With an extended average payment period of 86 days, DSO figures have worsened, hinting at a deterioration in credit management practices.
  • Credit Sales Impact: Decreased sales transacted on credit challenge companies' liquidity, limiting their ability to finance operations and growth efficiently.

Exploring Solutions and Strategies:

Polish businesses are proactively adopting measures to mitigate late payment risks and safeguard liquidity. The predominant strategy involves the shortening of payment terms to 45 days from invoicing, coupled with a marked preference for bank loans over trade credit. Precisely, 48% of businesses now opt for bank loans due to tighter domestic monetary conditions.

Moreover, companies are leaning towards managing customer credit risk in-house, with 70% preferring this hands-on approach. This trend highlights a cautious stance towards outsourcing to credit insurers, seeking to minimize interruptions in operations and enhance liquidity positions.

Considering Risk Mitigation Tools:

  • In-House Management: Preferring to manage credit risk internally enables businesses to have direct control over their credit policies and customer relationships.
  • Shorter Payment Terms: Reducing payment terms to an average of 45 days helps in maintaining a healthier cash flow and reducing the financial strain from overdue invoices.
  • Bank Loans Preference: With 48% of Polish businesses favoring bank loans, this preference underscores the ongoing shift towards more traditional financing methods to counteract liquidity pressures.

Delaying Payments to Suppliers: As a temporary measure, 50% of companies delay payments to their suppliers, although this may impact supply chain stability in the long term.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore main corporate structures

Overview of Corporate Structures in Poland and Implications for Creditors

Welcome to a foundational aspect of doing business in Poland – understanding the different corporate structures and what they mean for creditors. As an international creditor, it's vital to recognize that the type of company you're dealing with will significantly influence your strategies for debt collection and the liabilities involved. This understanding is key to navigating the Polish business landscape effectively and securing your financial interests.

Introduction: The Importance of Understanding Corporate Structure

At the heart of any business interaction in Poland is the corporate structure of the entities involved. Whether you're issuing a loan, extending credit terms, or entering into any business agreement, the corporate form of your customer or partner entity can dictate everything from profit-sharing to liability for debts. This becomes especially crucial when debt collection becomes a necessity. Knowing who ultimately holds the liability for a claim can make the difference between successful debt recovery and a fruitless endeavor.

Exploring Company Types in Poland

Poland offers a diversity of corporate forms, each with its own set of rules regarding liability, capital, and structure. Understanding these is crucial for creditors to navigate debt collection effectively. Let's delve into the primary types of companies in Poland:

  • Sole Proprietorship (Jednoosobowa działalnosc gospodarcza): This is the simplest form of business, where one individual owns and operates the enterprise. Liability is unlimited, meaning personal assets are at risk in case of business debts.
  • Civil Partnership (Społka cywilna): A non-registered form of partnership between two or more persons for undertaking business. As with sole proprietorships, partners have unlimited liability.
  • Registered Partnership (Społka jawna): Similar to civil partnerships but registered with the commercial court. Partners have unlimited liability for company obligations.
  • Professional Partnership (Spółka partnerska): Allows professionals, such as doctors and lawyers, to offer their services. Liability is limited to the partnership but unlimited for professional malpractice.
  • Limited Partnership (Społka komandytowa): Comprises at least one general partner with unlimited liability and one limited partner whose liability is restricted to their contribution to the partnership's capital.
  • Limited Joint-Stock Partnership (Społka komandytowo-akcyjna): A blend between a limited partnership and a joint-stock company. It has one or more general partners with unlimited liability and shareholders with liability limited to their shares.
  • Limited Liability Company (Społka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnoscia, Sp. z o.o.): The most popular corporate form for small to medium-sized businesses. Liability is limited to the company's capital.
  • Joint-Stock Company (Społka akcyjna, S.A.): Suitable for large enterprises. Offers shares to the public and liability is limited to the company.

Implications for Creditors

For creditors, the key takeaway is understanding the liability structure and the assets at risk in case of debt collection. Sole proprietorships and partnerships pose a higher risk due to their unlimited liability, possibly involving personal assets in debt recovery. On the other hand, entities like Limited Liability Companies and Joint-Stock Companies limit liability to the business, providing a clearer, albeit sometimes more challenging target for debt collection.

Understanding corporate structures is not just about gauging risk—it's also about tailoring your approach to debt collection. For example, negotiating repayment with a sole proprietor may involve personal assets, whereas, with a Spółka z o.o., the focus would be on the company's assets.

As you navigate the Polish business landscape, remembering these distinctions will empower you to make informed decisions and develop effective strategies for debt recovery. Whether evaluating potential clients or pursuing debts, the corporate structure plays a pivotal role in shaping your approach.

Based on our decade of experience, Debitura has honed strategies specific to each corporate type in Poland, ensuring our clients can navigate the complexities of debt collection with confidence and success.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore detailed country risk analysis

The economic risk in Poland

Our conclusion based on the economic risk factors, is that the economic risk in Poland is medium (3 out of 6). An economic risk of 3 out of 6 is pretty average in Europe.

GDP and economic growth are critical drivers for economic risk.
The GDP of Poland is 674,05 bn. USD (2021), growing by 5,73% per year.

In terms of the size of its economy, Poland ranks #22 out of 183 countries and has a large economy.

Having a view at the growth rate, it is ranked #63 out of 183 countries and is therefore considered a fast-growing economy.

GDP per capita is 17841 USD, ranking Poland number #45 out of 183 countries. The result of this is purchasing power of citizens in Poland is high compared to the rest of the world.

You can see a more throughout picture of GDP and economic growth in Poland in the table below:

GDP and economic growthLatest value
Economic growth: the rate of change of real GDP5,73%
Gross Domestic Product, billions of U.S. dollars674,05
GDP per capita, current U.S. dollars17840,92
GDP per capita, Purchasing Power Parity34363,02

Another critical driver for the economic risk score is the inflation rate and the interest rates. You can see a more throughout picture of monetary KPIs in Poland in the table below:

Monetary KPI'sLatest value
Inflation: percent change in the Consumer Price Index5,1%

The business environment risk in Poland

Our analysis shows that the business environment risk in Poland is low (2 out of 6), which is a pretty average risk score in Europe.

Economic freedom and rights determine the business environment risk in a country. Take a look at the important facts for Poland in the table below:

Economic freedom indexLatest value
Property rights index (0-100)63
Freedom from corruption index (0-100)65
Fiscal freedom index (0-100)74
Business freedom index (0-100)62
Monetary freedom index (0-100)80,8
Trade freedom index (0-100)84
Investment freedom index (0-100)80
Financial freedom index (0-100)70
Economic freedom, overall index (0-100)70

As you can see in the table, the property rights index is 63 in Poland, which is considered quite low in Europe.

The business freedom index is based on 10 indicators, using data from the World Bank’s Doing Business study. The Index is 62 in Poland, a quite low score for a country in Europe.

Poland's overall economic freedom index is 70 out of 100 and is based on factors such as the rule of law, regulatory efficiency, and market openness.

The political risk in Poland

The political risk in Poland is low, with a score of 2/6. This is a pretty average political risk score in Europe.

The governance and political stability indicators are critical drivers for political risk. An overview of Poland can be seen in the table below:

Governance and political stability indicators Latest value
Rule of law index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)0,44
Government effectiveness index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)0,29
Control of corruption (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)0,57
Political stability index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)0,51
Corruption Perceptions Index, 100 = no corruption56
Shadow economy, percent of GDP16,67%

The rule of law index analyses to which extent agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the quality of the courts, and the police's ability to enforce court orders.

When doing business in a country, the rule of law index is critical as it describes your ability to enforce commercial contracts.

In Poland, the rule of law index is at 0,44 points, with the score going from -2.5 (weak) to 2.5 (strong). Poland has, therefore, a high rule of law index, which means you should have a good chance of enforcing your contracts. If your individual customers have good creditworthiness, you should therefore feel relatively safe when providing credit.

Other drivers for the low political risks are the weak control of corruption, the weak political stability index, and the normal shadow economy that is 16,67% of Poland's GDP.

The commercial risk in Poland

In Poland, the commercial risk score is 2/4, which in our model is a low score. This low commercial risk score is relatively low compared to the average in Europe.

The commercial risk is impacted by a country's international trade relationships. You can see some of the key facts for Poland in the table below:

International trade and investment Latest value
Exports of goods and services as percent of GDP60,91%
Exports of goods and services, annual growth11,97%
Imports of goods and services as percent of GDP56,71%
Trade balance as percent of GDP4,2
Trade balance, billion USD30.78
Foreign exchange reserves, billion currency units166.03

Poland has a foreign exchange reserve of 166.03 bn. USD.

Poland has a positive trade balance of 4,2% of GDP. This means that Poland imports fewer goods and services than the country exports.

The annual growth of exports of goods and services has been growing 11,97% annually - now 60,91% of GDP. Import of goods and services represents 56,71% of the GDP in Poland.

The financing risk in Poland

We have calculated the financing risk to be 2/4, which equals a low risk. A low financing risk score is pretty average for countries in Europe.

The country's banking system, efficiency, and stability influence the financing risk. You can find the extra information for Poland in the table below:

Banking system efficiency and stabilityLatest value
Index of legal rights for creditors and borrowers (0 = weak to 12 = strong)7
Credit information sharing index, 0 (low) - 8 (high)8

In Poland, the credit information sharing index is 8 on a scale from 0 (low) to 8 (high). The result of this is accessibility and quality of credit information available in Poland is high.

This makes it easy for you to understand the credit risk of your counterpart in Poland. You would be able to find a good local credit rating agency that can help you analyse the creditworthiness of your specific customers.

Your rights as a creditor are 7 out of 12 and, therefore, medium.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Why Debitura is Your Trusted Authority in Debt Collection

At Debitura, we uphold the highest standards of impartiality and precision to bring you comprehensive guides on international debt collection. Our editorial team boasts over a decade of specialized experience in this domain.

By the Numbers:

  • Over 10 years of expertise in international debt collection.
  • Network strength: More than 100 local attorneys worldwide.
  • Recovery success: $100 million in debt recovered for our clients in the last 18 months alone.
  • Client trust: An exceptional average rating of 4.97 out of 5, reflecting feedback from over 600 satisfied clients.

Meet the Author: Robin Tam is the cornerstone of our content's credibility. With 16 years dedicated to international debt collection, Robin's expertise is unparalleled. As a leading partner at Debitura, Robin embodies the knowledge and integrity we stand for.

Contributors to This Guide: In our commitment to accuracy, this article has been reviewed and enhanced by esteemed local attorneys, each bringing their specialized legal insights to ensure the information we provide is thoroughly vetted and current:

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates