Premier Debt Collection in The Netherlands

Your trusted debt collection agency in the Netherlands. Upload your claim for swift, reliable recovery with no upfront fees. For a comprehensive understanding of local debt collection practices, explore our in-depth guide.

Get free expert advice
Get free advice from the best debt collection specialists.
Portrait of Our Debt Collection Expert - Dan, who is available for free, personalized advice.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.97/5 Average rating from 600+ reviews
Get a FREE evaluation of your claim
Fill out the form, and get a quick and free case evaluation.
We check if your claim is valid based on the statues of limitations
We provide you with a recommended recovery strategy
We forecast the recovery rate based on our database of resolved cases
We provide you with a free quote
Reset
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Ultimate Guide to Debt Collection in The Netherlands

Struggling with unpaid invoices in the Netherlands? Debitura streamlines your debt recovery process, offering a convenient, easy, and risk-free solution. Our guide provides step-by-step instructions, sample contracts, free templates, and best practices for debt collection under Dutch law.

Save time and ensure compliance by choosing Debitura as your local partner for effective Dutch debt recovery services.

Let Debitura Recover Your Claims - 100% Risk Free
Local Debt Collection Agencies and Attorneys

Debitura is a platform that connects you with local vetted collection agencies and lawyers around the world. Simply upload your case to our platform, and our local partners will provide you with a detailed quote within 48 hours.

Get up to3 custom quotes in 48 hours

Specify your requirements and we’ll align you with up to 3 leading collection agencies in under 48 hours. Each agency will offer a tailored, competitive rate, empowering you to make an informed decision.

Most of our partners offer a No Cre, No Pay pricing model for amicable debt recovery. This means that you Pay only upon successful recovery—ensuring the best value. Success fees range from 7.5% to 30%, payable only upon claim recovery. Create a free account, upload your claim, and get a tailored quote.

87% High Recovery Rate

Quick, professional and hassle-free B2B and B2C debt collection. 87% Consistent recovery rate – a testament to our global effectiveness. 4.97/5 Average rating from a diverse global clientele of over 5,000.

Quick Case Start

Quickly register for a free profile and effortlessly upload your claim within just 2 minutes. We synergize your request with our expansive network of over 500 attorneys and collection firms.

Global Experience

When it comes to international law expertise, debt collection, small claims filings, crafting precise demand letters, or finding top-notch lawyers worldwide, count on us as your trusted debt collection agency with a presence in 183 nations. Our comprehensive global investigations ensure you have the support you need.

Real-Time Tracking

Quickly register for a free profile and effortlessly upload your claim within just 2 minutes. Keep a close eye on your case progress through your dedicated dashboard.

The debt collection process in The Netherlands

Before diving deep into the specifics of Dutch debt recovery, let's briefly overview the typical collection process. This overview serves as a roadmap to navigate through the stages of debt recovery in the Netherlands.

01
Amicable Collection Phase

Initiate with a friendly, out-of-court collection aimed at an amicable resolution. This phase generally includes: Direct Communication, Reach out to your debtor to understand the payment delay. Payment Reminders: Use various communication methods (email, SMS, letters) for sending reminders. Formal Notice: Issue a formal notice letter, outlining the debt and the consequences of non-payment.

02
Court Proceedings

If the amicable approach fails, escalate the matter through legal proceedings to obtain a court judgment, essential for debt enforcement.

03
Debt Enforcement

With a court judgment in hand, you can pursue coercive measures like asset seizure and sale, referred to as debt enforcement.

04
Bankruptcy Proceedings

In cases where the debtor has no assets for seizure, consider filing for bankruptcy. If the debtor is already bankrupt, submit your claim promptly for verification.

Get streamlined, effective recovery support at every stage. Start your claim quickly with our hassle-free, no-fee service.

Overview of the Key Players in Dutch Debt Recovery

In the Netherlands, debt recovery follows a structured approach, clearly defining the roles of collection agencies, bailiffs, and attorneys. Here's how each contributes to a compliant and effective recovery process:

Collection Agencies in the Netherlands  

These agencies initiate the debt recovery process. They engage in negotiations and communication with debtors, adhering to standards set by the Dutch Debt Collection Services Quality Act. Although they manage extrajudicial debt recovery, they require bailiffs or attorneys for legal enforcement and court proceedings.

Court Bailiffs (Judicial Officers) in the Netherlands 

Appointed by law, bailiffs in the Netherlands have the authority to enforce debts nationwide. Bailiffs are empowered to send demand letters, initiate legal proceedings, and enforce court rulings, including asset seizure. Bailiffs require a court order to initiate debt enforcement. Bailiffs can obtain court orders themselves in Dutch subdistrict courts for claims up to EUR 25,000, but only collection lawyers can present cases exerting EUR 25.000 before court and thereby get a court order. Affiliated with the Royal Professional Organization of Judicial Officers is required for all judicial officers in the netherlands.

Collection Lawyers in the Netherlands

Specializing in complex debt recovery cases, lawyers are pivotal for claims exceeding EUR 25,000. They prepare legal documents, such as writs of summons, and can file for bankruptcy proceedings against Dutch debtors. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of debt recovery, providing comprehensive legal representation and advice.

Tap into Debitura's expert network of local debt recovery bailiffs and lawyers. Start your claim now.

Mastering Amicable Debt Collection in The Netherlands

Amicable debt collection emphasizes a relationship-centric approach to recouping owed monies, with a strong focus on understanding and negotiation instead of conflict. This technique cherishes the upkeep of a good relationship between the creditor and the debtor, striving for resolutions that honor the debtor's circumstances while securing the creditor's fund recovery. It advocates for a non-confrontational route suitable for undisputed claims, sidestepping the intricacies and financial burden of legal proceedings.

We advocate for initiating with amicable debt collection, barring instances where your claim is contested or entangled in complex legalities.

The Crucial Role of Collection Agencies in Amicable Settlements in The Netherlands

In the realm of amicable settlements, collection agencies are fundamental, particularly for creditors who are either too occupied or lack the necessary acumen for efficacious debt recovery. Firms such as Debitura are adept at offering tailored services, commencing with the accurate determination of debts and debtors and moving on to commence dialogues through reminders or formal notifications. Their dispassionate viewpoint, unmarred by personal stakes, frequently culminates in more effective debt resolution by facilitating neutral, proficient arbitration.

Perks of Choosing Amicable Debt Settlement

Electing amicable debt collection is mutually beneficial; it allows creditors to dodge the expenses associated with legal proceedings and maintain important business ties owing to the method's considerate nature. Debtors are afforded more flexible repayment options, alleviating economic pressure and nurturing favorable sentiments towards the creditor. This strategy accentuates mutual respect and empathy, laying the groundwork for a favorable setting to settle financial duties.

Shifting Gears from Amicable to Judicial Debt Recovery

Though amicable debt collection presents numerous advantages, there are scenarios where legal recourse becomes a consideration. Indicators prompting a shift towards judicial recovery encompass non-communication, continual failure to uphold financial commitments, or intentional dodging by the debtor. Resorting to legal measures should be a meticulously pondered option of last resort, due to the hefty expenses and duration associated with legal actions, and is generally advised after all amicable avenues have been thoroughly explored.

New to debt collection?
The debt collection process can be complex and daunting for those new to it. Our team of experts is here to help you understand the process and navigate it with ease. Get free expert advice on your specific case, provided by our team of experienced professionals.
5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating
"Thanks to Debitura, our company finally got the outstanding payments we were owed. Their debt collection services in Netherlands are unbeatable. We highly recommend them for their professionalism, efficiency and results."
Samantha Jones - Accounts Receivable Specialist
5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating5-star user rating
"Debitura helped us with debt recovery Netherlands and provided exceptional service. They were efficient, professional, and helped us collect what we were owed."
Katharina Schmidt - Controller
4.97/5
Average rating based on feedback from over 600 satisfied clients
87%
Average debt recovery rate, exceeding industry standards
100M+
Debt recovered for our clients in the past 18 months

The debt collection process in The Netherlands

Before diving deep into the specifics of Dutch debt recovery, let's briefly overview the typical collection process. This overview serves as a roadmap to navigate through the stages of debt recovery in the Netherlands.

Overview of the Amicable Collection Process in the Netherlands

Typically debt collection will start with the so-called amicable phase, trying to find solution with your debtor without involving the courts. Navigating through the amicable collection process in the Netherlands requires a clear understanding of the legal landscape and a strategic approach. This section provides a detailed, step-by-step guide to effectively manage out-of-court debt recovery. It includes practical advice, free templates, and essential resources to support your efforts.

Amicable Collection - Key Takeways
  • Payment Terms: 30 days for B2B/public authorities; consumer terms flexible but typically 14 days.
  • Statute of Limitations: 2 years for consumer, 5 years for business invoices; can be reset with a written reminder.
  • Essential Documentation: Includes contracts, invoices, and communication logs.
  • Communication: Start with a phone call, followed by payment reminders to resolve amicably.
  • Demand Letter: Escalates the matter, indicating legal action with a 16-day payment deadline.
  • Fees and Interest: Law allows a €40 fee, additional collection costs, and statutory interest for late payments.
  • Payment Arrangements: Structured plans for installment payments can be negotiated if full payment isn't feasible.

Mastering Amicable Debt Collection in The Netherlands

Amicable debt collection emphasizes a relationship-centric approach to recouping owed monies, with a strong focus on understanding and negotiation instead of conflict. This technique cherishes the upkeep of a good relationship between the creditor and the debtor, striving for resolutions that honor the debtor's circumstances while securing the creditor's fund recovery. It advocates for a non-confrontational route suitable for undisputed claims, sidestepping the intricacies and financial burden of legal proceedings.

We advocate for initiating with amicable debt collection, barring instances where your claim is contested or entangled in complex legalities.

The Crucial Role of Collection Agencies in Amicable Settlements in The Netherlands

In the realm of amicable settlements, collection agencies are fundamental, particularly for creditors who are either too occupied or lack the necessary acumen for efficacious debt recovery. Firms such as Debitura are adept at offering tailored services, commencing with the accurate determination of debts and debtors and moving on to commence dialogues through reminders or formal notifications. Their dispassionate viewpoint, unmarred by personal stakes, frequently culminates in more effective debt resolution by facilitating neutral, proficient arbitration.

Perks of Choosing Amicable Debt Settlement

Electing amicable debt collection is mutually beneficial; it allows creditors to dodge the expenses associated with legal proceedings and maintain important business ties owing to the method's considerate nature. Debtors are afforded more flexible repayment options, alleviating economic pressure and nurturing favorable sentiments towards the creditor. This strategy accentuates mutual respect and empathy, laying the groundwork for a favorable setting to settle financial duties.

Shifting Gears from Amicable to Judicial Debt Recovery

Though amicable debt collection presents numerous advantages, there are scenarios where legal recourse becomes a consideration. Indicators prompting a shift towards judicial recovery encompass non-communication, continual failure to uphold financial commitments, or intentional dodging by the debtor. Resorting to legal measures should be a meticulously pondered option of last resort, due to the hefty expenses and duration associated with legal actions, and is generally advised after all amicable avenues have been thoroughly explored.

Explore our step-by-step guide for amicable debt collection

Step 1: Prepare Your Case for Dutch Debt Collection

The first step in the debt collection process in the Netherlands is to ensure that your case is well-prepared and adheres to legal standards. This preparation is crucial for a successful recovery of your claim.

1.1 Verify the Validity of Payment Terms Under Dutch Law

Before proceeding with debt recovery, it's essential to confirm that the payment term you've set is legally valid and that the due date has passed. The payment terms are not just contractual obligations but are also regulated under Dutch law, and different rules apply based on the type of invoice.

  • B2B Invoices: For business-to-business transactions, the standard payment term under Dutch law is 30 days. However, there is flexibility for businesses to mutually agree on a different duration. It's important to note that these terms cannot exceed 60 days, a limit set by the European Directive for combating late payment in business dealings.
  • Public Authorities: In cases where your invoices are issued to Dutch public authorities, they are required to make payments within 30 days of the invoice receipt.
  • Consumer Invoices: The approach for consumer invoices differs significantly from B2B invoices. There is no predefined statutory payment term for consumer invoices in the Netherlands. Businesses are at liberty to set reasonable payment periods. A 14-day term is generally considered reasonable and standard. For effective enforceability, these terms should be clearly outlined in the contract or general conditions of sale.

By ensuring your payment terms are in line with Dutch regulations, you lay a solid foundation for the subsequent steps in the debt collection process

1.2 Statute of Limitations - Check the Expiration of the Invoice

Understanding the statute of limitations on invoices is a crucial aspect of debt collection in the Netherlands. This legal concept dictates the time frame within which you are entitled to pursue payment of an invoice. Once this period expires, you legally lose the right to claim the debt.

Here's what you need to know:

  • For Consumer Invoices: The statute of limitations for consumer invoices is generally 2 years. However, this period extends to 5 years for services and travel-related invoices. It's crucial to track these timeframes closely to ensure you don't lose the right to collect the debt.
  • For Business Invoices: When dealing with business clients, the limitation period is set at 5 years from the end of the payment term agreed upon in the invoice. This longer duration reflects the often more complex nature of B2B transactions.

Preventing Time-Bar of Claims:

A key strategy in debt collection is the concept of 'interruption'. By reminding your customer of the overdue invoice before the limitation period expires, you effectively reset the limitation clock. This action ensures that your right to collect the debt remains valid for another full limitation period. Here is what you should do:

  • Written Reminder: Send a written reminder to the debtor before the end of the limitation period, clearly stating that the invoice is due and reaffirming your intent to collect.
  • Legal Requirements: As per the Dutch Supreme Court's guidelines, such a communication should be a clear warning to the debtor, prompting them to retain relevant data and evidence for their defense.
  • Consideration of Context: The wording, context, and circumstances of the notice, including past correspondence, are vital in determining its validity under Article 3:317 (1) of the Dutch Civil Code.

Sample Letter for Interrupting the Statute of Limitations:

Here's a template to use for interrupting the statute of limitations on a debt:

[Your Company Name]

[Your Company Address]

[Date]

[Debtor's Name]

[Debtor's Address]

Re: Outstanding Invoice [Invoice Number]

Dear [Debtor's Name],

We are writing to remind you that invoice number [Invoice Number] dated [Invoice Date], with the amount of [Invoice Amount], remains unpaid. This letter serves as a formal notice to inform you that the payment for this invoice is overdue.

We would also like to inform you that this notice is intended to prevent the aforementioned claim from being affected by the statute of limitations, as stated under article 3:317 (1) of the Dutch Civil Code. We continue to assert our right to payment and all related legal claims unequivocally, and we expressly reserve all rights in this regard.

Please be aware that failure to settle this debt may compel us to initiate legal proceedings to recover the full amount of our claims, along with any applicable interest and costs.

We hope to resolve this matter amicably and urge you to contact us to discuss payment options.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Your Position]

[Your Contact Information]

In practical terms, keeping a close eye on the expiration dates of invoices and strategically sending reminders can preserve your legal right to collect, significantly impacting the success of your debt collection efforts in the Netherlands.

1.3 Assembling Essential Documents for Effective Debt Collection

The foundation of successful debt collection is built upon thorough documentation. Gathering and organizing the necessary documents is a critical step in establishing the legitimacy of your claim and ensuring a smooth legal process, if it becomes necessary. Here are the key documents to collect:

  • Original Contract or Agreement: This is the cornerstone document that outlines the terms of the debt between the creditor and debtor. It should detail the amount owed, payment terms, and any other relevant conditions. This contract serves as the primary proof of the debtor's obligation.
  • Invoices: Complete records of all invoices sent to the debtor are vital. These not only prove the existence of the debt but also help in calculating the total amount due, including any accrued interest or fees.
  • Payment Reminders and Correspondence: Documentation of all communication attempts with the debtor is crucial. This includes copies of payment reminders, emails, letters, and any responses received. These documents demonstrate your efforts to resolve the matter amicably.

Maintaining Communication Records: A Critical Aspect for Legal Proceedings

Effective record-keeping of communications with debtors is crucial, especially if the claim is disputed and requires legal intervention. The key elements to focus on include:

  • Detailed Communication Log: It's vital to maintain a comprehensive log of all interactions with the debtor. This log should chronicle the dates, modes of communication (like phone calls or emails), and summaries of each interaction. Such detailed records are invaluable in legal settings, providing a clear history of your efforts to resolve the debt.
  • Compliance with Legal Standards: All your documentation processes should adhere to Dutch laws, particularly regarding personal data protection. Handling sensitive information responsibly and legally is not just a compliance issue but also reflects your commitment to ethical practices.

A well-maintained and organized documentation system can significantly enhance the effectiveness of your debt collection endeavors. It not only bolsters your legal stance but also conveys your professional approach to the debtor.

Step 2: Call Your Customer for an Initiating Dialogue

In many instances, a phone call can serve as an effective first step. This approach allows for a more personal interaction and can provide insights into any issues or misunderstandings regarding the payment.

If your debtor is a Dutch company, it's crucial to speak with someone authorized to make decisions. You can find out who this is from the trade register of the Dutch Chamber of Commerce. This ensures that you are communicating with a person who has the authority to address and resolve the issue.

During the call, focus on:

  • Service Satisfaction: Politely ask if the service or product provided met their expectations.
  • Invoice Accuracy: Confirm whether the invoice was received and if all details on it are correct as per the debtor's records.
  • Payment Commitment: Try to secure a commitment on when the payment will be made.

This conversation is not only about fact-finding but also about maintaining a positive relationship. Be respectful and professional, as this can influence the debtor's willingness to settle the debt.

Documenting the Conversation

Documenting your conversation is vital. Make detailed notes of the call, including the date, the person you spoke with, and the key points discussed. This documentation can be crucial if the case escalates to legal proceedings. Under Dutch law, recording telephone conversations without the other party's consent can be legally sensitive. While you may not always be permitted to record calls without prior consent, transcriptions or audio recordings could still be admissible in civil court proceedings as evidence.

By following these steps and engaging in a thoughtful dialogue, you can often gain valuable insights into the reasons behind the delayed payment and potentially resolve the issue without needing to escalate further. Remember, the tone and approach of this conversation can significantly influence the debtor's responsiveness and willingness to settle the outstanding debt.

Step 3: Send a payment reminder

After the initial steps of preparing your case and calling your customer, if the payment is still outstanding, the next formal step is to send a payment reminder. This is a crucial part of the amicable collection process and serves as a gentle nudge to your debtor, reminding them of their obligation.

Why Payment Reminders are Important

  • Prompts Action: Often, late payments are due to forgetfulness or oversight. A payment reminder acts as a prompt for the debtor to take immediate action.
  • Maintains Professional Relationship: It helps maintain a cordial professional relationship, as it's a non-confrontational approach to debt recovery.
  • Documentation: It serves as a documented effort of your attempt to collect the debt amicably, which is important if the case escalates to legal proceedings.

Creating an Effective Payment Reminder

  • Timing: Send the reminder a few days after the payment term has expired. This timing is crucial as it balances between giving the debtor a reasonable grace period and ensuring prompt follow-up.
  • Content: The reminder should include:
  • A reference to the original invoice (invoice number and date).
  • A statement of the amount due.
  • A polite request for payment.
  • A notice that statutory interest will be charged if the payment continues to be delayed.

Tone: Keep the tone friendly and professional. This is a reminder, not a demand, and the aim is to preserve a good business relationship.

Delivery Method: Choose a method that ensures the reminder reaches the debtor promptly. Email is often effective, but depending on the situation, a physical letter or even a text message might be more appropriate.

[Your Company Letterhead]

[Date]

[Debtor's Name]

[Debtor's Address]

Re: Reminder for Outstanding Payment - Invoice [Invoice Number]

Dear [Debtor's Name],

I hope this message finds you well. We are writing to remind you that payment for invoice [Invoice Number], dated [Invoice Date], has not been received. The payment was due on [Due Date], and as of today, it remains outstanding.

We understand that sometimes delays can occur and would like to offer our assistance in case there are any issues or concerns regarding this payment. We value our relationship and aim to resolve this matter amicably.

Please note that if the payment is not received by [New Due Date], we may have to add statutory interest to the outstanding amount, as per our terms and conditions and in accordance with Dutch law.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to resolving it at the earliest. Should you have any questions or require further details, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Your Position]

[Your Contact Information]

Step 4: Send a Letter of Formal Notice (Demand Letter)

Following up on the amicable collection efforts, if the debtor still fails to make the payment, it's time to send a formal demand letter. This step escalates the seriousness of the matter, indicating your readiness to pursue further legal action if necessary.

The Importance of a Demand Letter in Dutch Debt Collection

  • Legal Requirement for Private Individuals: Under Dutch law, private individuals must receive a formal notice before any late payment fees or interest rates can be added to the claim. This legal safeguard provides them with a mandatory 16-day period (one day for sending, one day for receiving, and 14 days for reviewing) to settle the outstanding debt without additional charges
  • Different Protocols for Businesses: If the debtor is a business, the process can be more flexible, often guided by the terms set out in your general conditions.

Key Elements of a Dutch Demand Letter

  • References: Include details of the transaction, overdue invoice, prior communications, and sent reminders.
  • 16-Day Payment Term: Clearly set a 16-day deadline for payment, in compliance with Dutch legal standards.
  • Consequences of Non-Payment: State your intention to charge collection costs and default interest, and mention potential legal action if payment is not received within the stipulated period.

Delivery and Documentation

  • Method of Sending: Utilize both registered mail (with confirmation of receipt) and regular mail for sending the demand letter. Email can also be used, but for legal certainty, registered post is preferable.
  • Record Keeping: Retain copies of the demand letter and any delivery receipts. This documentation is crucial if the case escalates and you need to provide evidence of your efforts to recover the debt.

By carefully crafting and sending this demand letter, you move one step closer to resolving the debt issue, while still maintaining a professional and legally compliant approach. This letter serves as a critical document, underlining the seriousness of your intent to recover the debt through legal means if necessary.

Step 5: Charge Collection Costs and Statutory Interest

When faced with unpaid invoices, Dutch law permits creditors to add specific charges to the outstanding amount. This step is vital in the debt collection process, as it compensates for the efforts and resources involved in pursuing the debt. These late payment penalties are:

  • Compensation Fee: A standard collection cost of €40 is applicable. This is a fixed fee allowed under Dutch law for your efforts in attempting to collect the debt.
  • Collection Cost: Beyond the fixed fee, you can charge a reasonable compensation for additional expenses incurred. This includes legal fees, administrative costs, or any other collection-related expenses. This cost is supplementary to the €40 minimum fee.
  • Interest: From the day the payment term expires, you are entitled to charge statutory interest on the outstanding amount.

How To Calculate Dutch Debt Collection Costs

Collection costs in the Netherlands are the expenses a creditor incurs while attempting to collect unpaid debts. These costs become applicable when a debtor fails to pay voluntarily. The nature of these costs and the amount that can be charged are regulated by Dutch law to ensure fairness and prevent exorbitant charges.

The Decree on the Collection of Costs Act (WIK: Act of 15 March 2012) plays a crucial role here. It amends Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure, providing a clear structure for calculating collection costs.

Scale for Collection Costs

The WIK stipulates a scale to calculate these costs, capping the maximum amount at €6,775. The breakdown is as follows:

  • For the first €2,500: 15% (minimum €40)
  • For the next €2,500: 10%
  • For the next €5,000: 5%
  • For the next €190,000: 1%
  • For amounts above €200,000: 0.5% (up to a maximum of €6,775)

Minimum Collection Costs

There is a legal minimum of €40 for collection costs. For instance, if your invoice is €300, the collection agency can charge 15% of €300, which is €45.

Interest Rates on Late Payments in the Netherlands

The statutory interest rate is a key component in debt collection, compensating creditors for the delay in payment. This rate is set annually by the Dutch government, particularly the Ministry of Justice and Security, as outlined in Section 6:119a of the Dutch Civil Code. The aim of this interest is to provide fair compensation for the use of capital in B2B and government-related transactions. It encourages timely payments and compensates for the financial impacts of delayed payments, such as lost income or additional financing costs.

Different Types of Statutory Interest

  • For Non-Commercial Transactions: The statutory interest rate for consumer transactions (non-commercial) as of July 1, 2023, is set at 6%. This rate is often referred to as the “statutory interest for consumers” and applies to scenarios like compensation for delay or overdue payments from private individuals.
  • For Commercial Transactions: Commercial transactions have a different rate, known as the statutory commercial interest. As of July 1, 2023, this rate is 12%. It applies to transactions between companies or between companies and government institutions.

Calculation of Statutory Commercial Interest

  1. Determine the Calculation Period: From the due date to the date of actual payment.
  2. Determine the Amount: The outstanding claim, including collection costs and other charges.
  3. Apply the Interest Rate: 6% for non-commercial and 12% for commercial transactions.

Example Calculation: For an outstanding amount of €10,000 with a payment term expired, and at a 12% interest rate, the interest would be: (€10,000 x 12%) / 100 = €1,200. This €1,200 is in addition to the original €10,000 debt.

This comprehensive approach to charging collection costs and statutory interest is a critical aspect of debt recovery in the Netherlands. It ensures that creditors are fairly compensated for their efforts and losses due to delayed payments while keeping the process within legal and ethical boundaries.

Interest Rates on late payments in the Netherlands

The interest rate of the statutory interest is determined annually by the government . The Ministry of Justice and Security annually determines the percentage of the statutory interest. This is regulated in Section 6:119a of the Dutch Civil Code .

​​Statutory commercial interest non-commercial transactions

In the Netherlands there is a statutory interest rate for non-commercial transactions. From July 1, 2023, the statutory interest rate for non-trade transactions is set at 6%. This is the so-called “statutory interest for consumers”. This interest rate applies to, for example, compensation, damage due to delay, or if there is interest on overdue payments from private individuals.

Statutory interest for commercial transactions

A different interest rate applies to commercial transactions, namely the statutory commercial interest. From 1 July 2023, the percentage of the statutory commercial interest has been set at 12%. This percentage applies to commercial transactions between companies, or between companies and government institutions.

Please note: the statutory commercial interest is a different percentage than the statutory interest for consumers. It is important to know that these percentages can change annually and that there can also be differences per country or region.

What is the purpose of statutory commercial interest

The purpose of statutory commercial interest is to provide statutory compensation for the use of capital in business-to-business commercial transactions, or between businesses and government agencies.

It is intended to encourage parties to pay on time and to compensate for the financial consequences of a late payment, such as, for example, missing income, having to pay extra interest to third parties or taking out extra financing to cover liquidity needs. cover.

Statutory commercial interest provides companies with a legal instrument to enforce payment and ensures that the payment risk is shared more fairly between the trading parties. It can also help improve business cash flow and avoid bankruptcies due to late payments.

By setting a statutory interest rate, parties are encouraged to meet their payment obligations , creating more certainty and stability in trade relations between companies and between companies and governments.

How do you calculate the statutory commercial interest

The statutory commercial interest is an interest rate that is calculated on the outstanding amount of a commercial transaction where the payment term has expired. The statutory commercial interest is calculated as follows:

  • Determine the period over which the interest is calculated: This is the period between the due date of the payment term and the date when the payment is finally received.
  • Determine the amount on which the interest is calculated: This is the amount of the outstanding claim, including any collection costs and other costs.
  • Determine the interest rate: For non-trade transactions, the interest rate for 2023 (2nd half year, from 1 July ) is 6%. For commercial transactions, the interest rate for 2023 (2nd half year, from 1 July ) is 12.00%.
  • Calculate the statutory commercial interest: Multiply the amount on which the interest is calculated by the interest rate, and divide by 100. This is the amount of statutory commercial interest that must be paid over the period.

Example statutory interest: If the outstanding amount of a commercial transaction is €10,000 and the payment term has expired, the following interest must be calculated at an interest rate of 12.00% over the period in which the payment was overdue:

(€10,000 x 12.00%) / 100 = 1200

In this example, the statutory commercial interest is therefore €1200. This amount is in addition to the outstanding amount of € 10,000 that still has to be paid.

You can see the statutory interest rates here.

Step 6: Make a Payment Arrangement

Is this not possible for your customer to pay the full claim at once? Then agree on a payment arrangement. Put this arrangement in writing and agree that the arrangement will lapse if your customer does not pay at the agreed times.

Sample Of A Payment Arrangement Under Dutch Law - Template Settlement

A sample of such a payment arrangement could be this template:

On [...] we agreed on a payment schedule concerning invoice [...] in the amount of EUR [...]. I hereby confirm the payment arrangement agreed by us.

As from [...] you will repay the outstanding amount of EUR [...] in [...] instalments:

EUR [...], payable not later than [...]

EUR [...], payable not later than [...]

EUR [...], payable not later than on [...] and

finally the remaining amount of EUR [...], payable not later than on [...].

These instalments must be credited to our bank account with IBAN [...] in the name of [...], stating [...].

If one of the instalments is not paid, not paid in full or not paid on time, this payment arrangement shall immediately lapse, without any notice of default or other communication from our side being required. The amount outstanding at that time shall then become due and payable in full, plus interest and a charge for our legal fees.

We are sending you this letter in duplicate. To confirm and formalise our payment arrangement, please sign one copy of this letter, indicating with your signature the place and date of signature. Please return the signed letter to us. Our payment arrangement will not be effected if we have not received the letter signed for approval by you within one week of its date. In that case, we will be forced to take legal measures to collect the claim, with all the costs that this entails.

We assume, of course, that it will not have to come to that and we look forward to receiving your signed letter as well as your instalment payments under this payment schedule.

This letter is also expressly intended to prevent our claim from being affected by the statute of limitations and should be read as an interruption of the statute of limitations pursuant to Article 3:317, paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code. We will continue to assert our legal claims against you unequivocally and we expressly reserve all rights. You should take into account that we will initiate legal proceedings against you if payment is not made.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Free Demand Letter Template

[Your Company Letterhead]

[Date]

[Debtor's Name]

[Debtor's Address]

Re: Formal Demand for Payment - Invoice [Invoice Number]

Dear [Debtor's Name],

We regret to note that despite our previous reminders, the payment for invoice [Invoice Number], dated [Invoice Date], with a total amount of EUR [Invoice Amount], remains outstanding. The due date for this invoice was [Due Date].

As per our records, we have previously engaged in discussions and sent a payment reminder regarding this matter, but the invoice remains unpaid. This delay in payment constitutes a breach of the agreed terms.

We hereby formally demand that the outstanding amount be paid within 16 days from the date of this letter. Please make the payment to our bank account, details as follows:

- IBAN: [Your IBAN]

- Bank Name: [Your Bank Name]

- Reference: Invoice Number [Invoice Number]

Should the payment not be received within this 16-day period, we will be compelled to initiate legal proceedings to recover the full amount due, along with any applicable statutory interest and extrajudicial as well as judicial collection costs.

We hope to avoid taking such actions and trust you will fulfill your financial obligations promptly. If the payment has already been made, please disregard this notice.

For any queries or to discuss payment arrangements, feel free to contact us.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Your Position]

[Your Contact Information]

Invoking Retention of Title and Reclamation Under Dutch Law for Unpaid Goods

In the business landscape of the Netherlands, the challenge of unpaid goods is a recurring concern for sellers. To mitigate financial risks associated with non-payment, Dutch law provides two powerful legal mechanisms: Retention of Title (RoT) and the Right of Reclamation. These tools are not only pivotal in securing the interests of sellers but also in ensuring a fair trading environment.

Retention of Title (RoT) Under Dutch Law

RoT, as governed by Article 3:92 of the Dutch Civil Code, is a contractual arrangement where ownership of an item remains with the seller until the buyer fully settles the purchase price. This concept is critical in transactions as it provides sellers with a legal recourse in case of non-payment.

The application of RoT is subject to specific conditions. Primarily, it must be explicitly agreed upon in the contract, typically within the general terms and conditions. RoT is specifically relevant for claims related to the delivery of goods, encompassing not just the purchase price but also additional charges like assembly costs and damages. This broad scope makes RoT a robust tool against non-payment, effective even in scenarios involving the buyer's bankruptcy.

A unique aspect of RoT in Dutch law is the requirement to notify the Tax Authorities when the goods qualify as 'soil goods' – movable items on the debtor’s property that are used to furnish it. This preemptive measure is essential for safeguarding the seller's rights to these goods.

Remarkably, the RoT can be extended to previous and future agreements, providing security for all related contracts. This extension amplifies the protective scope of RoT, making it a versatile tool in the seller's legal arsenal.

An effective RoT clause encompasses several key provisions. It includes terms for holding the goods in trust (as bailee), mandates for their care and insurance, and guidelines for their storage and sale. Additionally, it grants the seller rights for property inspection and reclamation, and legal recourse for recovering the cost of goods in case of non-payment.

Right of Reclamation Under Dutch Law

The Right of Reclamation, enshrined in Article 7:39 of the Dutch Civil Code, serves as another shield for sellers. It allows the reclamation of goods if the buyer defaults on payment. Unlike RoT, this right is automatically applicable under Dutch law and does not require a separate contractual agreement.

Upon invoking this right, the purchase agreement is dissolved, and the buyer’s ownership rights are terminated, effectively nullifying the purchase. This immediate reversal of ownership is a critical advantage of this right.

The buyer, under this law, is obliged to return the unpaid goods. Should the buyer resist, the seller is empowered to seek judicial assistance for reclaiming their property. However, unlike RoT, the Right of Reclamation does not permit the seller to claim full compensation for all associated losses, such as lost profits or additional work costs.

Get started with
amicable debt collection

Upload your claim and get started with our 100% no-cure-no-pay collection solution.

100% free
Get the best price
No-cure-no-pay
Fast collection process
High recovery rate
100%
Risk free
Upload claim!

Get started with amicable collection. 100% risk-free!
100% No Cure, No Pay

Find a Debt Collection Lawyer

Finding the right lawyer for judicial debt collection is crucial. Debitura offers a streamlined 'Find a Lawyer' service, drawing from our network of 500+ local attorneys across the globe. Describe your needs and quickly get tailored proposals from up to three top lawyers.

Your Benefits at a Glance:

  • Verified Lawyers: Access vetted professionals for reliable representation.
  • Free Matching & Quotes: Get matched and receive quotes with no hidden fees.
  • Competitive Rates: Benefit from fair, negotiated pricing for quality services.

Explore the profiles of our esteemed local partners below and take the first step towards securing your legal advantage with Debitura.

Antonio Vivaldistraat 6, 1083 HP Amsterdam
Russell Advocaten B.V.

The law firm of Russell Advocaten will gladly assist you collecting your claims, both at national and international level. We assess how to effectively incite the debtor to pay, we initiate the collection process and ensure that it runs smoothly.

Lawsuits
Legal collection
Debt enforcement
16
1943
Law firm
Willem de Zwijgerlaan 350 / 3E - 1055 RD Amsterdam
Ansbertus Law Firm

Ansbertus Law is a fast-growing legal practice worldwide with excellent knowledge of the law.

Lawsuits
Legal collection
Debt enforcement
30
2005
Law firm
Mr. Berendsen Advocaten

Renowned Law firm in Amsterdam-Duivendrecht - Mr. Berendsen Advocaten. Delivering trusted labor and rental law services since 2006, we prioritize client interests through a holistic, cost-effective approach in global debt collection. Excellence and commitment at your service.

Lawsuits
Legal collection
Debt enforcement
2
2006
Law firm
Davids Advocaten

Leading in debt-driven corporate advocacy since 2005, Davids Advocaten is your skilled Law firm in Amsterdam specialising in insolvencies, corporate restructuring, and debt collection litigation. Guiding businesses towards financial stability and growth, we are your steadfast partner in complex economic scenarios.

Lawsuits
Legal collection
Debt enforcement
13
2005
Law firm

Introduction to Debt Enforcement in the Netherlands

Enforcing a court decision in the Netherlands forms a pivotal aspect of the legal process, especially in debt collection cases. This procedure ensures that judgments made by courts are not mere formalities but are actively put into effect. Enforcing these decisions often involves a series of steps and parties, each playing a crucial role in ensuring the lawful execution of the court's ruling.

Debt Enforcement - Key Takeways
  • Legal Enforcement: Debt enforcement in the Netherlands ensures court decisions are effectively implemented, crucial for both creditors and debtors.
  • Bailiffs' Role: Bailiffs are key in the enforcement process, with duties including serving documents, executing orders, and seizing assets.
  • Creditor-Debtor Dynamics: A nuanced approach by bailiffs balances enforcing creditors' rights and respecting debtors' legal protections.
  • Official Duties: Bailiffs perform official duties like legal proceedings initiation and asset seizures, underpinned by the Dutch Bailiffs Act.
  • Legal Framework: The Bailiffs Act, Code of Civil Procedure, and Civil Code govern bailiff operations and debt enforcement in the Netherlands.
  • Pre-Enforcement Analysis: Assessing the debtor's assets and enforcement viability is essential before initiating enforcement actions.
  • Asset Tracing: Locating debtor assets through financial record analysis is crucial for effective debt recovery.
  • Hidden Asset Evaluation: Identifying and evaluating concealed or undervalued assets is key in cases of debt evasion.
  • Enforcement Timeframe: The duration of debt enforcement varies, influenced by the complexity and the type of assets involved.
  • Enforcement Costs: Bailiff fees, regulated by the government, cover a range of actions from document service to property seizures, impacting the financial implications of debt enforcement.

Impact on Creditors and Debtors

Debt enforcement is of immense significance to both creditors and debtors. For creditors, it represents the culmination of a legal journey, often initiated to recover debts owed to them. This process is crucial for maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system, assuring creditors that their rights are protected under the law. Conversely, for debtors, understanding this process is vital as it informs them of their obligations and the potential consequences of non-compliance with court orders. Our decade-long experience in debt collection in the Netherlands has shown that a thorough grasp of this process aids in fostering a more cooperative environment between creditors and debtors.

The Role of Bailiffs in the Netherlands

In the realm of debt enforcement in the Netherlands, bailiffs play an indispensable role. Appointed and regulated under the Dutch Bailiffs Act, these judicial officers possess the authority to perform a variety of official duties. Their responsibilities include delivering legal documents, executing court orders, and performing asset seizures. They are instrumental in turning court decisions from paper into action, bridging the gap between a judgment granted and its actual implementation.

Interaction with Debtors and Creditors

The interaction between bailiffs, creditors, and debtors is a delicate balancing act. Bailiffs must ensure that the creditor's rights are enforced while also respecting the legal rights and protections afforded to the debtor. This interaction often requires a nuanced approach, balancing assertiveness with empathy. In our extensive experience in debt collection in the Netherlands, we've observed that bailiffs' effectiveness lies not just in their legal authority but also in their ability to navigate these complex interpersonal dynamics.

Official and Non-official Activities

Bailiffs in the Netherlands engage in a range of activities, some of which are court-mandated ('official duties') while others are additional services they are authorized to perform ('non-official activities'). Official duties primarily include initiating legal proceedings, delivering judicial judgments, asset seizures, and executing evictions. In contrast, non-official activities might involve sending collection letters or representing creditors in legal proceedings.

Legal Framework for Bailiff Operations and Debt Enforcement in the Netherlands

The operations of bailiffs and the broader framework of debt enforcement in the Netherlands are governed by a set of specific laws and regulations. At the forefront is the Bailiffs Act (Gerechtsdeurwaarderswet), which outlines the legal position of bailiffs, their official duties, and the scope of their authority. Additionally, the Code of Civil Procedure delineates various official acts of bailiffs, such as issuing summons, conducting evictions, and executing seizures. The Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek) further plays a critical role, particularly in defining the rights of recovery of goods and the distribution of proceeds in execution cases involving multiple creditors.

Pre-Enforcement Actions in Debt Collection in the Netherlands

Before proceeding with enforcement actions, it's essential to assess the viability and profitability of the process. This preliminary phase involves examining the debtor's assets and understanding the costs and timeline for enforcing the judgment. Such an evaluation is key to making informed decisions in the debt recovery journey.

Debtor Tracing Tactics

Prior to initiating enforcement proceedings, a crucial step is locating the debtor's assets. This is typically achieved through debtor tracing tactics. Asset search involves a comprehensive review of financial records, bank statements, tax returns, and other pertinent documents to identify assets. For example, a debtor may have properties or investments not immediately evident. Forensic accounting plays a pivotal role here, analyzing these financial documents for discrepancies or hidden transactions, essential in cases where debtors have complex financial structures.

Evaluation of Hidden Assets


Equally important is the evaluation of hidden assets. This step goes beyond just identifying assets; it involves a thorough assessment of the debtor's financial status to unearth assets that may be deliberately concealed or undervalued. This process is especially critical for creditors dealing with debtors who may have attempted to evade debt recovery by transferring or hiding assets. The meticulous evaluation ensures that all potential sources for debt recovery are identified and considered.

Explore the cost and time frame for debt enforcement

Time Frame for Debt Enforcement

The duration of debt enforcement in the Netherlands can vary significantly. Typically, it may take a few weeks to several months, depending on the complexity of the case and the debtor’s response. For instance, salary attachments can be quicker, potentially taking a few weeks, while real estate seizures might extend over several months due to the need for valuation and sale. Creditors and debtors must understand these varying time frames for better financial planning and strategic decision-making.

Costs for Debt Enforcement - Financial Implications

Understanding the costs involved in debt enforcement in the Netherlands is crucial for both creditors and debtors. A significant part of these costs stems from the services rendered by bailiffs, who are pivotal in the enforcement process. Their fees, set by the government, encompass a variety of official acts such as serving documents, property seizures, and executing court orders. The table below, effective from January 1, 2024, provides a detailed look at the rates for these official acts as per the "Decree on rates for official acts of bailiffs." It offers insight into the potential expenses associated with each stage of the debt enforcement process, from initiating summonses to conducting property seizures and evictions. This information is key for evaluating the financial impact of enforcement actions.

Official Act Rate (€)
Summons or initiating proceedings112.37
Service of a title122.34
Service of a petition/summons for court appearance89.33
Other services not specified80.64
Seizure of movable property (not registered)147.54
Seizure requiring third-party cooperation196.47
Seizure of bearer/rights/registered securities289.37
Attachment of registered shares318.87
Seizure of bearer shares/third-party seizure233.28
Third-party seizure of periodic payments165.48
Attachment as per Article 479b of CCP142.93
Attachment under the creditor195.40
Execution to surrender movable property338.55
Seizure to obtain movable property146.45
Seizure of immovable property or registered aircraft202.50
Lifting of immovable property seizure73.46
Seizure of ships or unregistered aircraft444.10
Judicial custody300.91
Public sale announcements109.89
Public sale of movable property384.40
Notification of foreclosure takeover103.58
Forced eviction of immovable property288.68
Execution of coercion335.29
Request for information (Article 475aa CCP)94.08
Viewing as per Article 550 CCP170.30
Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore asset seizure and salary attachment options

Seizure of Assets:

A Key Enforcement Measure Asset seizure is a crucial part of the debt enforcement process in the Netherlands. It involves legally confiscating the debtor’s assets to satisfy outstanding debts as mandated by a court order. The process is executed by bailiffs who identify and take control of the debtor's assets. This action can only commence once an enforceable court decision or order is in place. The seized assets are either directly used to repay the creditor or sold, with the proceeds going towards debt settlement.

For asset seizure to be legally executed, specific conditions must be met:

  • Enforceable Document: The creditor must possess an enforceable document, such as a court order or judgment, that clearly stipulates the debt obligation.
  • Service of Document: This document must be officially served to the debtor prior to the commencement of any seizure actions, ensuring that the debtor is aware of the impending enforcement.

Types of Assets Subject to Seizure

Various types of assets can be seized in the Netherlands, each with specific regulations governing the process:

  • Movable Property: This includes tangible assets like vehicles, furniture, and machinery. Such properties are physically seized and either returned to the creditor or sold at auction.
  • Real Estate: Property seizure includes houses, land, and other real estate assets. These are typically sold in a public auction, with the proceeds going towards debt repayment.
  • Shares and Securities: Financial assets such as shares, bonds, and other securities can also be seized. The process involves transferring ownership or selling these assets to recover debts.

Understanding these various asset types and their seizure implications is vital for both creditors and debtors to navigate the debt enforcement landscape effectively.

Pre-Judgment Arrest of Assets

Pre-judgment arrest of assets in the Netherlands serves as a proactive measure for creditors to secure their claims against a debtor before a court issues a final judgment. This legal tool is particularly beneficial in preventing the dissipation or concealment of assets by the debtor that might otherwise jeopardize the creditor’s ability to recover the owed amount.

For a pre-judgment arrest to be legally executed, several conditions must be met:

  • Credible Claim: The creditor must present a plausible claim against the debtor.
  • Risk of Asset Dissipation: There must be a demonstrable risk that the debtor may dispose of or hide assets.
  • Court Approval: A court order is required to authorize the pre-judgment arrest of assets. 

The Dutch legal system incorporates measures to protect debtors from excessive hardship during pre-judgment asset arrest:

  • Seizure-Free Threshold: There’s a legally mandated limit to ensure debtors retain enough assets or income for basic living expenses.
  • Judicial Oversight: The courts oversee the process to ensure fairness and prevent abuse.

Garnishment Rights and Salary Attachments

Garnishment rights and salary attachments represent a significant tool in debt enforcement in the Netherlands. This process involves legally diverting a portion of the debtor's income, such as salary, benefits, or other periodic payments, directly to the creditor. It is particularly employed when other assets are not sufficient to cover the debt.

The Garnishment Procedure: 

  • Court Order: The process begins with a court order that permits the garnishment of the debtor's income. This order is usually obtained after other assets have been considered for seizure.
  • Notification to the Employer or Bank: Once the order is in place, the bailiff notifies the debtor's employer or bank about the garnishment. This notification legally obliges the third party to withhold a portion of the debtor's income.
  • Determination of Garnishable Amount: The amount that can be garnished is not arbitrary. It must adhere to the legal guidelines that protect a minimum income level for the debtor, ensuring they can meet basic living expenses. This is known as the seizure-free threshold.
  • Regular Payment to Creditor: The employer or bank then regularly transfers the garnished amount directly to the creditor until the debt is settled or the court order expires.

Garnishment Impact for debtors and creditors 

  • On the Debtor: Garnishment can significantly impact the debtor’s financial situation. While it ensures that basic living needs are met, the reduced income can lead to lifestyle adjustments and financial strain.
  • On the Creditor: For creditors, garnishment provides a steady, albeit potentially slow, stream of debt repayment. It is especially useful when other assets are either non-existent or insufficient.
  • Legal Compliance: Both the creditor and the employer/bank must comply with legal regulations governing the process, including respecting the seizure-free threshold and adhering to the duration set by the court order.

The Dutch Attachments Register

The Attachments Register, maintained by the Dutch Royal Professional Organisation of Judicial Officers (KBvG), plays a crucial role in the debt enforcement process:

  • Record-Keeping: It records all attachment orders executed by bailiffs, including earnings orders and garnishee orders.
  • Transparency and Accountability: The register ensures transparency in the enforcement process and holds bailiffs accountable for their actions.

The primary objectives of the Attachments Register are:

  • Preventing Unnecessary Fees: It aims to avoid excessive collection costs that might arise from multiple attachments.
  • Debtor Protection: The register helps protect a certain portion of the debtor's income from seizure (the seizure-free rate).
  • Managed by KBvG: The KBvG is responsible for managing and updating the register, ensuring its accuracy and reliability.
Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Get started with debt enforcement. Create a free profile, and get 3 quotes from local lawyers.

Get started with
debt enforcement

Upload your claim and get 3 FREE quotes from our local collection partners.

100% free
Get the best price
No-cure-no-pay
Fast collection process
High recovery rate
100%
Risk free
Upload claim!

Insolvency Proceedings in the Netherlands: A Creditor's Guide

The realm of insolvency procedures in the Netherlands plays a pivotal role in the landscape of debt collection. These procedures are a crucial aspect for creditors to understand, as they significantly impact the recovery of debts. Insolvency, essentially, occurs when an individual or a company is unable to meet their debt obligations. This can lead to either restructuring the debt or liquidating assets to pay off creditors.

Governing Laws and Legal Framework: Insolvency proceedings in the Netherlands are governed by several key legislations. The most notable among these are the Bankruptcy Act (Faillissementswet), which details the process of declaring a debtor bankrupt, and the Natural Persons Debt Restructuring Act (Wsnp), which focuses on the restructuring of personal debts. For creditors, understanding these laws is critical as they outline the process and their rights during the insolvency proceedings of a debtor.

For asset seizure to be legally executed, specific conditions must be met:

  • Enforceable Document: The creditor must possess an enforceable document, such as a court order or judgment, that clearly stipulates the debt obligation.
  • Service of Document: This document must be officially served to the debtor prior to the commencement of any seizure actions, ensuring that the debtor is aware of the impending enforcement.

Types of Assets Subject to Seizure

Various types of assets can be seized in the Netherlands, each with specific regulations governing the process:

  • Movable Property: This includes tangible assets like vehicles, furniture, and machinery. Such properties are physically seized and either returned to the creditor or sold at auction.
  • Real Estate: Property seizure includes houses, land, and other real estate assets. These are typically sold in a public auction, with the proceeds going towards debt repayment.
  • Shares and Securities: Financial assets such as shares, bonds, and other securities can also be seized. The process involves transferring ownership or selling these assets to recover debts.

Understanding these various asset types and their seizure implications is vital for both creditors and debtors to navigate the debt enforcement landscape effectively.

Pre-Judgment Arrest of Assets

Pre-judgment arrest of assets in the Netherlands serves as a proactive measure for creditors to secure their claims against a debtor before a court issues a final judgment. This legal tool is particularly beneficial in preventing the dissipation or concealment of assets by the debtor that might otherwise jeopardize the creditor’s ability to recover the owed amount.

For a pre-judgment arrest to be legally executed, several conditions must be met:

  • Credible Claim: The creditor must present a plausible claim against the debtor.
  • Risk of Asset Dissipation: There must be a demonstrable risk that the debtor may dispose of or hide assets.
  • Court Approval: A court order is required to authorize the pre-judgment arrest of assets.

The Dutch legal system incorporates measures to protect debtors from excessive hardship during pre-judgment asset arrest:

  • Seizure-Free Threshold: There’s a legally mandated limit to ensure debtors retain enough assets or income for basic living expenses.
  • Judicial Oversight: The courts oversee the process to ensure fairness and prevent abuse.

Insolvency Proceedings - Key Takeways
  • Insolvency Procedures: Critical for creditors in debt recovery in the Netherlands, focusing on either restructuring debt or liquidating assets.
  • Key Legislation: The Bankruptcy Act and the Natural Persons Debt Restructuring Act are essential for understanding creditors' rights and the insolvency process.
  • Claims Prioritization: In bankruptcy, secured creditors generally have a higher chance of recovery compared to unsecured creditors, affecting debt recovery outcomes.
  • Duration Variability: The length of insolvency proceedings can vary significantly, typically from two to five years, influenced by case complexity and debtor cooperation.
  • Creditor Outcomes: Depending on the resolution of the proceeding, creditors may receive partial payments through asset liquidation or engage in compromises during debt restructuring.

Understanding Priority Rules in Bankruptcy

In the event of a bankruptcy, not all claims are treated equally. The Netherlands' insolvency law stipulates a specific order in which claims are to be satisfied.

Prioritizing Claims: The law categorizes claims into different classes, with each class having a different priority level. For instance, claims related to insolvency proceedings (such as the costs of the trustee) are typically repaid first. These are followed by preferential claims, including tax and social security claims, and finally, unsecured normal claims.

Implications for Creditors: For creditors, the priority of their claim can significantly influence the likelihood of recovering their debts. Secured creditors, who have collateral against their loans, generally have a higher chance of recovery compared to unsecured creditors. Understanding where one's claim falls in this hierarchy is essential for creditors to assess their potential for debt recovery in bankruptcy situations.

The Duration of Insolvency Proceedings

The duration of insolvency proceedings can vary based on several factors and can significantly impact a creditor's recovery process.

Typical Timeframe: On average, insolvency proceedings in the Netherlands can last anywhere from two to five years. This duration is dependent on the complexity of the case, the size of the debtor's assets, and the number of creditors involved.

Factors Influencing Duration: Various elements can influence the length of these proceedings. These include the efficiency of the appointed trustee, the debtor's cooperation in the process, and the complexity of the asset liquidation or debt restructuring processes. Creditors should be aware of these factors as they can affect the timeline of debt recovery.

Outcomes of Bankruptcy Proceedings

Bankruptcy proceedings can culminate in various ways, each having distinct implications for creditors.

  • Potential Resolutions: The outcomes of bankruptcy proceedings in the Netherlands can range from the liquidation of the debtor's assets to satisfy creditor claims, to restructuring the debtor’s debts. In some cases, a bankruptcy can end if the debtor reaches an agreement with the creditors, or if the court converts the bankruptcy into a debt restructuring process under the Wsnp.
  • Impact on Creditors: The specific outcome of a bankruptcy proceeding greatly influences a creditor's ability to recover debts. Liquidation often results in partial payment to creditors based on the priority rules, while debt restructuring might lead to a compromise where creditors receive less than the total amount owed. Understanding these potential outcomes helps creditors in making informed decisions during the insolvency process.

Cost Implications of Filing for Bankruptcy in the Netherlands

As a creditor, filing for bankruptcy against a debtor involves more complexities and costs. These osts include: 

Legal and Court Fees: Creditors are responsible for paying the lawyer's fees for submitting the bankruptcy petition. Additionally, court fees are also applicable.

Court Fee Details: The fees vary based on the entity's nature:

  • €87 for insolvent individuals.
  • €320 for private individuals.
  • €688 for organizations.

Payment Term: These fees must be paid within 4 weeks from the date of filing the petition. Timely payment of court fees is crucial to ensure the smooth processing of the bankruptcy filing. If the fee is not paid within the stipulated time, the court may choose not to hear the case. However, the obligation to pay the court fee still remains.

Post-Bankruptcy Scenarios for Creditors

Navigating the post-bankruptcy environment is essential for creditors aiming to maximize their potential for debt recovery. Understanding the procedures and actively participating in the bankruptcy process can significantly influence the outcomes of these proceedings.

Claim Submission in Bankruptcy Cases

After a debtor is declared bankrupt, it's crucial for creditors to promptly and accurately submit their claims. This process involves sending detailed documentation, such as outstanding invoices and contractual agreements, to the appointed bankruptcy trustee. The timelines for these submissions are strictly governed by the bankruptcy court, and missing these deadlines can result in a creditor's claim being overlooked. Therefore, it's imperative for creditors to stay vigilant and submit their claims within the specified time frame.

Actively Participating in the Bankruptcy Process

The role of a creditor in the bankruptcy process doesn't end with the submission of claims. Staying informed and actively engaged is vital. This means keeping abreast of updates from the bankruptcy trustee, attending creditor meetings, and being prepared to vote on proposals regarding the bankruptcy proceedings. In cases where a creditor feels their interests are not being adequately represented or protected, they have the right to challenge decisions that might negatively impact their claim. This active involvement can often be the difference between recovering a significant portion of the owed amount and leaving the process with minimal or no repayment.

Explore our step-by-step guide for insolvency proceedings

Insolvency Proceedings in the Netherlands: Step-by-Step Guide for Creditors

This guide provides a step-by-step approach for creditors seeking to file for the bankruptcy of another entity in the Netherlands. It ensures that each legal aspect and procedural requirement is comprehensively covered.

Step 1: Check The Conditions for Filing for Bankruptcy

Before initiating the bankruptcy process, it's crucial to assess if your debtor meets the specific conditions required for filing bankruptcy.

  • Payment Cessation: The debtor must have ceased all payments.
  • Multiple Debts: The debtor should have at least two debts from different creditors, with at least one debt due immediately.

Step 2: Filing a Bankruptcy Petition

The initiation of the bankruptcy process starts with filing a petition.

  • Engage a Lawyer: A lawyer must submit the bankruptcy petition on behalf of the creditor.
  • Petition Submission: The lawyer sends the petition to the district court to declare the debtor bankrupt.
  • Handling Concurrent Petitions: If multiple petitions are filed against the same debtor, the court will process the oldest qualifying petition first.

Step 3: Notice of the Hearing

After submitting the petition, the next step is to receive and understand the notice for the court hearing.

  • Receiving Court Notification: The creditor's lawyer receives a notice detailing the hearing's specifics.
  • Informing the Debtor: The debtor also receives this notice, which may include information about debt restructuring options.

Step 4: Your Debtor Can Object to Your Application (Defence)

In this step, the debtor is given an opportunity to object to the bankruptcy petition.

  • Defence Options: The debtor can either submit a written defence or present it orally at the hearing.
  • Statement of Defence: The debtor must detail their counter-arguments and may include evidence to support their stance.

Step 5: The Hearing

The hearing is a pivotal step where both parties present their cases.

  • Conduct of the Hearing: The hearing is typically not public, with specific rules governing the proceedings.
  • Mandatory Presence: The creditor and their lawyer must be present at the hearing to avoid petition rejection.

Step 6: Decision

This step involves the judge’s decision based on the hearing.

  • Immediate Decision or Delayed Judgment: The judge often makes a decision during the hearing, though it can sometimes be delayed.
  • Notification of Judgment: All parties receive a copy of the judgment, which is also published in the Government Gazette.

Step 7: Opposition, Appeal, and Judicial Review

After the decision, there are options for contesting the court’s ruling.

  • Opposition to Default Judgment: The debtor can oppose a default judgment within a specified timeframe.
  • Appeal Process: Either party can appeal the decision to a higher court.
  • Judicial Review: If still unsatisfied, parties can seek a judicial review by the Supreme Court.
Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

International Debt Collection in the Netherlands

In an increasingly globalized economy, international debt collection becomes a pivotal aspect of business, especially for companies engaged in cross-border trade. The Netherlands, known for its robust trade networks and business-friendly environment, offers a well-defined legal framework for handling international debt recovery. This framework is particularly important for businesses operating within or in connection with Dutch entities, as it ensures the efficient and fair resolution of payment disputes.

International debt collection in the Netherlands is governed by a combination of national and European legal instruments, providing a structured approach to recovering debts across borders. The European Late Payment Directive, European Small Claims Procedures, and European Payment Orders are key components of this framework, each addressing different aspects of debt recovery. For businesses engaged in international trade, awareness and understanding of these mechanisms are vital for effective debt management and dispute resolution. As global commerce continues to expand, the role of these legal tools in facilitating smooth and fair international transactions becomes increasingly important.

Collecting cross border claims - Key Takeways
  • Globalized Framework: The Netherlands has a robust legal framework for international debt collection, essential for businesses involved in cross-border trade.
  • Legal Instruments: International debt recovery is governed by both national laws and European instruments like the European Late Payment Directive, Small Claims Procedures, and Payment Orders.
  • Late Payment Directive: This directive is crucial in B2B and B2G transactions, imposing penalties and interest for late payments, thereby protecting cash flow, especially for SMEs.
  • Small Claims Procedure: For low-value cross-border disputes, the European Small Claims Procedure offers a simplified, cost-effective, and swift resolution process.
  • Payment Order: The European Payment Order enables creditors to efficiently recover uncontested debts across EU borders, circumventing lengthy court procedures.
  • Professional Assistance: Legal representation or collaboration with specialized agencies is vital for navigating the complexities of international debt collection laws and procedures.
  • Enforcement of Judgments: In the Netherlands, enforcing foreign judgments is subject to specific regulations and treaties, underscoring the need for a deep understanding of both Dutch and international laws.
Explore cross border collection options

The European Late Payment Directive in the Netherlands

Central to this framework is the European Late Payment Directive, incorporated into Dutch law to address late payments in commercial transactions. The directive primarily targets business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) transactions, setting clear guidelines on payment terms and conditions. Under this directive, strict penalties and interest rates are imposed for late payments, serving as a deterrent and ensuring that businesses adhere to agreed payment schedules. This directive plays a crucial role in maintaining the cash flow and financial health of businesses, particularly small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that are more vulnerable to the impacts of delayed payments.

European Small Claims Procedures

For cross-border disputes involving relatively small amounts (claims below a certain threshold), the European Small Claims Procedure offers an efficient solution. This procedure simplifies the resolution of low-value disputes across EU member states, including the Netherlands. Its design emphasizes ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and speed, with most of the process conducted in writing. This reduces the need for parties to be physically present in court, a significant advantage for international litigants dealing with distance and language barriers.

European Payment Orders

Another crucial tool in the arsenal of international debt collection is the European Payment Order. Designed to facilitate the recovery of uncontested cross-border debts, this order streamlines the process of claiming debts across EU borders. Obtaining a European Payment Order involves a straightforward application process, after which the order is enforceable across EU member states. This mechanism is particularly useful for creditors as it bypasses the often lengthy and complex traditional court procedures.

Handling International and Cross-Border Cases in the Netherlands

When dealing with international debt collection in the Netherlands, understanding the nuances of jurisdiction and the enforcement of foreign judgments is crucial. Legal representation or collaboration with specialized debt collection agencies can be invaluable in navigating these complexities. These professionals offer expertise in Dutch and European debt collection laws and are adept at handling the intricacies of cross-border legal proceedings.

In international cases, the enforcement of foreign judgments in the Netherlands is guided by specific regulations and treaties. These rules ensure that a foreign creditor can enforce their rights effectively, provided that certain legal criteria are met. This aspect underscores the importance of a thorough understanding of both Dutch and international law in cross-border debt recovery.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates

Country Risk Rating

Business in the Netherlands: Navigating Payment Terms, Corporate Structures, and Risks

Navigating the business landscape in the Netherlands requires a keen understanding of the inherent risks. This section offers an insightful overview of payment terms, including Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), equipping you with essential guidelines for effective accounts receivable management. Additionally, we delve into the various corporate structures to clarify the liability landscape of your Dutch customers. Finally, we provide a high-level analysis of the diverse risks associated with conducting business in the Netherlands, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the market dynamics.

Our analysis has shown that the risk of doing business in Netherlands is low. Based on this low score, You can feel reasonably confident that you will be able to get paid when trading with customers in Netherlands. Nonetheless, we always recommend doing a specific credit analysis on an individual customer basis before offering any credit. The low risk score is based on the following factors:

Low risk
5-10
Medium-low risk
11-15
Medium risk
16-20
Medium-high risk
21-23
High risk
24-26
Low risk
5-10
Medium-low risk
11-15
Medium risk
16-20
Medium-high risk
21-23
High risk
24-26
Low risk
5-10
Medium-low risk
11-15
Medium risk
16-20
Medium-high risk
21-23
High risk
24-26
Low risk
5-10
Medium-low risk
11-15
Medium risk
16-20
Medium-high risk
21-23
High risk
24-26
Low risk
5-10
Medium-low risk
11-15
Medium risk
16-20
Medium-high risk
21-23
High risk
24-26
Key Takeways
  • DSO Management: Prioritize understanding and managing Days Sales Outstanding for effective cash flow.
  • Credit Control: Implement strong credit management to mitigate heightened credit risks.
  • Flexible Payment Terms: Adapt to the Dutch preference for lenient B2B payment terms to maintain competitiveness.
  • Liquidity Solutions: Consider external financing options in response to Dutch liquidity challenges.
  • Liability in Corporate Structures: Grasp the implications of Dutch corporate structures to assess credit risk accurately.
  • Stable Business Environment: Benefit from the Netherlands' low economic and political risk for a stable operation base.
  • Risk Awareness: Stay informed about medium commercial risks and creditor rights in financial dealings.
  • Trade Credit Usage: Utilize trade credit and insurance as tools for financial planning and risk mitigation.
Explore Payment Trends and DSO

Key Trends in B2B Payments and Cash Flow Management in the Netherlands

The business landscape in the Netherlands is evolving rapidly, particularly in the realm of business-to-business (B2B) transactions. The Atradius Payment Practices Barometer 2023 offers valuable insights into the current trends and challenges faced by Dutch companies in managing payments and cash flow. This section delves into these key trends, highlighting the strategies and concerns shaping the B2B payment practices in the Netherlands.

Rising Credit Risk and Emphasis on Working Capital Management

In the wake of the pandemic, Dutch businesses are grappling with an increased credit risk, exacerbated by the cessation of financial support, inflationary pressures, and escalating energy and input costs. Companies are responding by placing a heightened emphasis on working capital management, a crucial step in navigating the altered credit landscape.

Challenges of Late Payments and Bad Debts

Late payments are a significant issue, affecting nearly half of all B2B sales on credit. Additionally, bad debts account for approximately 7% of B2B invoiced sales, with the transport sector being particularly vulnerable. This trend underscores the need for robust credit control and collection strategies to mitigate the impact on cash flow.

Liquidity Shortages Leading to Payment Delays

The primary cause of payment delays and defaults has been identified as liquidity shortages among B2B customers. Additionally, customer disputes have emerged as a growing factor contributing to late or non-payment scenarios.

Strategic Financing and Investment Choices

Confronted with these challenges, about half of the Dutch companies have sought external financing to fulfill their working capital needs. Many are opting to delay investments as a precautionary measure against liquidity constraints.

Adapting B2B Payment Policies

In an increasingly competitive and price-sensitive market, Dutch suppliers are moving towards more lenient B2B payment policies. Longer payment terms are now more common, averaging around 40 days, as businesses aim to reduce inventory build-up and enhance cash availability for operational needs.

Utilizing Trade Credit and Credit Insurance

Trade credit has emerged as a popular choice for short-term financial planning, with 60% of businesses resorting to this option. Furthermore, credit insurance is gaining prominence as a tool to manage Days-Sales-Outstanding (DSO) fluctuations and safeguard profitability.

Future Outlook: Optimism Amidst Inflation Concerns

While there is a general sense of optimism about improvements in B2B payment behavior and economic demand, concerns about inflation persist. Businesses fear the long-term impact of high inflation levels on purchasing power and economic growth. The services sector, in particular, continues to add to inflationary pressures.

Managing in a Price-Sensitive Environment

The challenge of staying competitive in the Dutch economy’s price-sensitive environment is particularly pronounced for SME wholesalers in the consumer durables sector. These businesses must navigate a fine balance between maintaining competitive pricing and managing payment and credit risks effectively.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore main corporate structures

Main Corporate Structures and Their Implications for Creditors in Debt Collection in the Netherlands

In the Netherlands, the liability for business debts significantly varies depending on the type of corporate structure. This variance in liability is crucial for creditors to understand when engaging in debt collection. The following section explores the main corporate structures and what they imply for creditors in the context of debt recovery.

Sole Proprietorship

A sole proprietorship is typically used for small businesses managed by an individual without the need for a commercial structure. In this structure, the owner is fully liable for all business debts. This implies that in the context of debt collection, creditors can pursue the personal assets of the sole proprietor to satisfy business debts.

Partnerships (Vennootschap Onder Firma, VOF)

Partnerships involve two or more individuals sharing ownership and responsibilities. In this structure, partners are jointly and individually liable for the actions of the other partners. For creditors, this means they can hold any or all partners responsible for the debt, providing multiple avenues for debt recovery.

Limited Liability Partnerships (Commanditaire Vennootschap, CV)

In a Limited Liability Partnership, there is limited liability for the partners. This structure offers some protection for partners' personal assets against business debts, making debt collection more challenging as creditors may only have recourse to the assets of the partnership.

Private Limited Liability Companies (Besloten Vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid, BV)

These are common business entities in the Netherlands, offering limited liability to the partners equivalent to their contribution. For creditors, this means that they can only target the assets of the company and not the personal assets of the shareholders or directors, unless in cases of wrongful or fraudulent activities.

Public Limited Liability Companies (Naamloze Vennootschap, NV)

Used for larger structures, these companies divide their capital into tradable shares, with the shareholders' liability limited to the value of their shares. Creditors can only claim against the company’s assets, making individual shareholders' assets unreachable for business debts.

Branch Offices of Foreign Companies

Branch offices offer no liability limitations to the foreign parent company. In debt collection, this means that the foreign parent company can be held fully responsible for the debts of the branch office, giving creditors the possibility to claim against a potentially larger and more solvent entity.

Joint Ventures

Joint ventures in the Netherlands can take the form of any of the legal structures mentioned above. They do not necessarily require incorporation, relying instead on a contract drafted for the purpose. The liability and hence the approach for creditors in debt collection depend on the specific legal structure chosen for the joint venture.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Explore detailed country risk analysis

The economic risk in Netherlands

Our analysis shows that the economic risk in Netherlands is very low (1 out of 6). An economic risk of 1 out of 6 is low in Europe.

GDP and economic growth are critical drivers for economic risk.
The GDP of Netherlands is 1018,01 bn. USD (2021), growing by 5,04% per year.

In terms of the size of its economy, Netherlands ranks #18 out of 183 countries and has a large economy.

Having a view at the growth rate, it is ranked #78 out of 183 countries and is therefore considered a fast-growing economy.

GDP per capita is 58061 USD, ranking Netherlands number #13 out of 183 countries. This means the purchasing power of citizens in Netherlands is high compared to the rest of the world.

You get a more detailed idea of GDP and economic growth in Netherlands in the table below:

GDP and economic growthLatest value
Economic growth: the rate of change of real GDP5,04%
Gross Domestic Product, billions of U.S. dollars1018,01
GDP per capita, current U.S. dollars58061
GDP per capita, Purchasing Power Parity56761,02

Another major impact for the economic risk score is the inflation rate and the interest rates. You get a more detailed idea of monetary KPIs in Netherlands in the table below:

Monetary KPI'sLatest value
Inflation: percent change in the Consumer Price Index2,7%

The inflation in Netherlands was 2,7% in 2021 which is considered a low inflation rate.

The business environment risk in Netherlands

Our analysis shows that the business environment risk in Netherlands is very low (1 out of 6), which is a relatively low risk score in Europe.

The business environment risk are determined by the level of economic freedom and rights in a country. You can see the critical facts for Netherlands in the table below:

Economic freedom indexLatest value
Property rights index (0-100)89
Freedom from corruption index (0-100)91
Fiscal freedom index (0-100)52
Business freedom index (0-100)81
Monetary freedom index (0-100)80,4
Trade freedom index (0-100)84
Investment freedom index (0-100)90
Financial freedom index (0-100)80
Economic freedom, overall index (0-100)77

In the above table, you can see, the property rights index is 89 in Netherlands, which is considered good in Europe.

The business freedom index is based on 10 indicators, using data from the World Bank’s Doing Business study. The Index is 81 in Netherlands, a pretty good score for a country in Europe.

Netherlands's overall economic freedom index is 77 out of 100 and is based on factors such as the rule of law, regulatory efficiency, and market openness.

The political risk in Netherlands

The political risk in Netherlands is very low, with a score of 1/6. This is a low political risk score in Europe.

The governance and political stability indicators are important drivers for political risk. An overview of Netherlands can be seen in the graphs below:

Governance and political stability indicators Latest value
Rule of law index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)1,74
Government effectiveness index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)1,77
Control of corruption (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)2,04
Political stability index (-2.5 weak; 2.5 strong)0,92
Corruption Perceptions Index, 100 = no corruption82
Shadow economy, percent of GDP7,83%

The rule of law index analyses to which extent agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the quality of the courts, and the police's ability to enforce court orders.

When doing business in a country, the rule of law index is critical as it describes your ability to enforce commercial contracts.

In Netherlands, the rule of law index is at 1,74 points, with the score going from -2.5 (weak) to 2.5 (strong). Netherlands has, therefore, a very high rule of law index, which means you have a very good chance of enforcing your contracts. If your individual customers have good creditworthiness, you should therefore feel relatively safe when providing credit.

Other drivers for the very low political risks are the very strong control of corruption, the average political stability index, and the small shadow economy that is 7,83% of Netherlands's GDP.

The commercial risk in Netherlands

In Netherlands, the commercial risk score is 3/4, which in our model is a medium score. This medium commercial risk score is pretty average compared to the average in Europe.

The commercial risk is impacted by a country's international trade relationships. You can see some of the key facts for Netherlands in the table below:

International trade and investment Latest value
Exports of goods and services as percent of GDP83,6%
Exports of goods and services, annual growth6,61%
Imports of goods and services as percent of GDP72,59%
Trade balance as percent of GDP11,01
Trade balance, billion USD112.08
Foreign exchange reserves, billion currency units64.47

Netherlands has a foreign exchange reserve of 64.47 bn. USD.

Netherlands has a positive trade balance of 11,01% of GDP. This means that Netherlands imports fewer goods and services than the country exports.

The annual growth of exports of goods and services has been growing 6,61% annually - now 83,6% of GDP. Import of goods and services represents 72,59% of the GDP in Netherlands.

The financing risk in Netherlands

We have calculated the financing risk to be 1/4, which equals a very low risk. A very low financing risk score is relatively low for countries in Europe.

The country's banking system, efficiency, and stability influence the financing risk. You can find the extra information for Netherlands in the table below:

Banking system efficiency and stabilityLatest value
Index of legal rights for creditors and borrowers (0 = weak to 12 = strong)2
Credit information sharing index, 0 (low) - 8 (high)7

In Netherlands, the credit information sharing index is 7 on a scale from 0 (low) to 8 (high). This means the accessibility and quality of credit information available in Netherlands is medium-high.

This makes it easy for you to understand the credit risk of your counterpart in Netherlands. You should therefore be able to find a good local credit rating agency that can help you analyse the creditworthiness of your specific customers.

Your juridical rights as a creditor are 2 out of 12 and, therefore, very weak.

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates
Why Debitura is Your Trusted Authority in Debt Collection

At Debitura, we uphold the highest standards of impartiality and precision to bring you comprehensive guides on international debt collection. Our editorial team boasts over a decade of specialized experience in this domain.

By the Numbers:

  • Over 10 years of expertise in international debt collection.
  • Network strength: More than 100 local attorneys worldwide.
  • Recovery success: $100 million in debt recovered for our clients in the last 18 months alone.
  • Client trust: An exceptional average rating of 4.97 out of 5, reflecting feedback from over 600 satisfied clients.

Meet the Author: Robin Tam is the cornerstone of our content's credibility. With 16 years dedicated to international debt collection, Robin's expertise is unparalleled. As a leading partner at Debitura, Robin embodies the knowledge and integrity we stand for.

Contributors to This Guide: In our commitment to accuracy, this article has been reviewed and enhanced by esteemed local attorneys, each bringing their specialized legal insights to ensure the information we provide is thoroughly vetted and current:

Icon - Elements Webflow Library - BRIX Templates