The China payment picture
Share of Chinese companies paying B2B invoices on time in Q4 2025, with severe delays (90-plus days) down to 3.2%.
Last updated 14 August 2026 · 15 figures · 7 primary sources
Most Chinese companies pay B2B invoices on time, but severe delays of 90-plus days still touch a meaningful share of the rest.
The China payment picture
Share of Chinese companies paying B2B invoices on time in Q4 2025, with severe delays (90-plus days) down to 3.2%.
of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, including 38% carrying 31-60% of invoices overdue at any time.
Atradius, 2026 →of Chinese B2B suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed.
Atradius, 2026 →jump in the share of Chinese companies reporting ultra-long payment delays (180-plus days) worth over 2% of turnover, to 49% in 2024 from 33.1% in 2023.
Coface, 2025 →Debitura Collection Risk Score
A Chinese B2B receivable carries meaningfully more collection risk than the low-band countries in this report. Coface rates the country’s country risk ‘B’ (Fairly High), Allianz Trade ranks Chinese collection procedure ‘Severe’ - the 6th most complex of the 52 economies it scores - and the World Justice Project places Chinese civil justice 70th of 143 countries. For a creditor with debtors in China, that combination means budgeting for a slower, more contested recovery process than in a Low or Moderate-band market, not a higher chance of non-payment on any single invoice.
Based on 3 of 4 sources
Severe collection complexity on Allianz Trade’s 2026 ranking - the 6th most complex of 52 economies, a steeper rating than any other country covered so far in this report.
Allianz Trade, 2026 →China’s rank on the World Justice Project’s Civil Justice factor - the weakest civil-justice score of the countries covered so far in this report.
World Justice Project, 2025 →| Coface Country Risk Assessment | B retrieved 6 August 2026 | 6.1 |
| Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 | 66 / 100 Statistical Appendix 1, p. 24 | 6.6 |
| WJP Rule of Law Index 2025 - Civil Justice | 0.53 ranked 70th of 143 | 4.7 |
| World Bank B-READY 2025 | China is not covered | not available |
The Debitura Collection Risk Score is an editorial comparison index covering 177 countries, built from four public, independently published sources and shown on a 1-10 scale where 10 is the highest collection risk. It displays in four bands: Low below 3.5, Moderate 3.5-4.9, Elevated 5.0-6.4, High 6.5 and above. China’s 5.8 falls in the Elevated band.
Each available component is mapped onto the common 1-10 scale with a fixed linear mapping, and the score is the simple average of whichever components exist. Coface: A1=1.0, A2=2.3, A3=3.6, A4=4.9, B=6.1, C=7.4, D=8.7, E=10.0. Allianz: max(1, score ÷ 10). B-READY: max(1, (100 - the average of the Dispute Resolution and Business Insolvency topic scores) ÷ 10). WJP: max(1, (1 - score) × 10). A country needs at least two of the four to receive a score. For China: (6.1 + 6.6 + 4.7) ÷ 3 = 5.8.
China’s score rests on three of the four components. The World Bank’s B-READY 2025 dataset does not cover China - the country is not among its 101 economies - so the dispute-resolution and business-insolvency component is absent rather than estimated.
This is not a credit rating. The Debitura Collection Risk Score is an editorial comparison index for a statistics and journalism product. It is not a credit rating, not a probability of default, not a measure of any individual company’s creditworthiness, and not legal or financial advice. It is not produced by a regulated rating agency and must not be used as a substitute for one.
Payment behaviour
Chinese suppliers extend the least trade credit of the Asian markets Atradius surveys, yet the payment terms they do grant run as long as anywhere in the region - and the tail of slow payers is the region’s longest.
of Chinese B2B sales are made on trade credit - the lowest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed, against a 43% regional average.
Atradius, 2026 →of Chinese B2B suppliers set payment terms under 30 days - tied with Japan for the highest share of the 8 Asian markets surveyed.
Atradius, 2026 →of Chinese B2B suppliers report DSO above 90 days - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed.
Atradius, 2026 →average Days Sales Outstanding in China - relatively high against most countries Allianz Trade covers, and not efficiently regulated, per Allianz’s 2026 report.
Allianz Trade, 2026 →These are two different measures from two different sources - Atradius’s share-exceeding-90-days figure and Allianz’s separate average-DSO estimate are not directly comparable.
Payment terms, five years
Average B2B payment terms in China rose to 76 days in 2024 from 70 in 2023 - tied with Taiwan for the longest of the nine Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveys, and above the regional average. Coface →
Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025, 2020-2024
Source: Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025
‘Disputes over quality’ and ‘goods or services not as agreed’ tie as the top reasons Chinese B2B customers give for paying late, each cited by 55% of respondents - well ahead of a complex payment process (41%) or the customer’s own cash-flow issues (24%).
What it costs
Most overdue Chinese invoices do get paid eventually. The share that does not follows a short, visible path: from overdue, to written off, to a supplier cutting back on its own investment.
of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, including 38% carrying 31-60% of invoices overdue at any time. Atradius →
wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed. Atradius →
say customer payment risk is what most limits their investment - ahead of reduced liquidity headroom (38%), cash-flow planning strain (33%) and higher capital costs (30%). Atradius →
Even as most invoices are eventually settled, severe delays are not shrinking fast: 3.2% of Chinese companies experienced severe payment delays (over 90 days) in Q4 2025 - down only slightly on the year, per CRIBIS D&B’s punctuality release.
Source: CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026
China and its region
Four separate benchmarks rank China near the harder end of the Asia-Pacific range Coface and Atradius survey. Each row compares China with the nearest values the publisher itself reports; figures from different publishers are not combined.
Each row draws on a single publisher’s own Asia-Pacific or Asian-market comparison table, so the bars within a row are directly comparable; rows are not comparable with one another. Coface’s Asia Payment Survey covers nine Asia-Pacific markets (Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand); Atradius’s statistical appendix covers eight Asian markets (China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam), shown alongside a separate Asia regional average. Bar lengths are drawn proportional to the value shown, scaled to the largest bar in each row; no figure has been rescaled, imputed or harmonised across sources. Named peers in each row are the publisher’s own nearest values to China’s, not the best-known regional economies.
Insolvenz
Allianz Trade counts 7,138 Chinese business insolvencies in 2025, up from 6,653 in 2024 and 6,481 in 2023, and forecasts a further 9% rise to 7,750 in 2026 and 8,150 in 2027. China now accounts for 18.7% of Allianz’s Global Insolvency Index - the second-largest single-country share, behind only the United States (27.8%). Eurostat’s register-based bankruptcy index used on this report’s European pages does not cover China, so Allianz Trade’s own count is the primary source here. Allianz Trade →
Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026, statistical appendix, 2023-2027
For a creditor
Three things the Chinese figures on this page imply for anyone holding a receivable from a Chinese customer.
Days Sales Outstanding in China runs around 94 days on average - close to three months between delivery and cash - relatively high against most countries Allianz Trade covers. Allianz Trade →
83% of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices, and only 17% report none at all - so an overdue invoice on its own is common rather than exceptional. The share that goes on to become a write-off is smaller but real: 21% of suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026. Atradius → Atradius →
China accounts for 18.7% of Allianz Trade’s Global Insolvency Index - behind only the United States - and the country’s own insolvency count is forecast to keep rising, to 7,750 cases in 2026. Allianz Trade →
China statistics library
15 curated figures from 7 primary sources. Each carries its publisher, year and exact locator, and each has a permanent anchor you can link to directly.
15 statistics
57.4% of companies in China paid their B2B invoices on time in Q4 2025, with severe delays (90+ days) down to 3.2%.
CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026 (22nd edition) Article section 'Payment punctuality worldwide: improvements in the United States and China'
Coface rates China 'B' (Fairly High) for country risk on its A1-E scale - the Coface Country Risk Assessment component (mapped 6.1) in Debitura's Collection Risk Score.
Coface Country Risk Map Coface Country Risk Map, interactive dashboard, China country pop-up (data-id="CN" data-rating="B"), retrieved 6 August 2026
China scores 66 out of 100 on the Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026, ranked 6th most complex of 52 economies tracked and rated 'Severe' - though improved from 71 in 2022, 73 in 2018 and 76 in 2014.
Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 Statistical Appendix 1 'Overview of ranking, score, ratings and sub-ratings by country', p. 24
DSO in China runs around 94 days on average - relatively high compared with most countries Allianz covers - and late payments are not efficiently regulated, per Allianz's 2026 Collection Complexity report.
Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 'Collection Complexity in Asia' section, China bullet points, p. 18
China scores 0.53 on WJP's Civil Justice factor (Rule of Law Index 2025), ranked 70th of 143 countries - the score component used in Debitura's Collection Risk Score (mapped 4.7).
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 WJP Rule of Law Index 2025, Civil Justice factor country dataset, China entry
38% of Chinese B2B sales are made on trade credit (62% cash) - the lowest trade-credit share of the 8 Asian markets in Atradius' 2026 survey, against a regional average of 43%.
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 3, table 'Share of total B2B sales by payment type - Region-Market'
54% of Chinese B2B suppliers set payment terms under 30 days - tied with Japan for the highest share of the 8 Asian markets surveyed, against a regional average of 47%.
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 4, table 'Average payment terms - Region-Market'
83% of Chinese B2B suppliers report at least some overdue invoices (17% report none), including 38% with 31-60% of invoices overdue - above the 35% regional average for that band.
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 5, table 'Payment behaviour of B2B customers (12 months) - Region-Market'
5% of Chinese B2B suppliers report DSO above 90 days - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets Atradius surveyed, above the 3% regional average.
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 6, table 'Annual average Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) - Region-Market'
21% of Chinese B2B suppliers wrote off more than 5% of annual B2B sales as bad debt in 2026 - the highest share of the 8 Asian markets surveyed, narrowly ahead of India (20%).
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer Asia 2026 (Statistical Appendix) Statistical Appendix - Asia 2026, p. 7, table 'Share of annual B2B sales written off as bad debt - Region-Market'
'Disputes over quality' and 'Goods/services not as agreed' tie as the top reasons Chinese B2B customers cite for paying late, each named by 55% of respondents - well ahead of 'complex payment process' (41%) and 'customer cash flow issues' (24%).
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026 Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026, p. 5, chart 'Top 4 reasons B2B customers pay invoices late'
51% of Chinese B2B suppliers say customer payment risk most limits their investment - the top-ranked impact on working capital, ahead of reduced liquidity headroom (38%), cash-flow planning strain (33%) and higher capital costs (30%).
Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026 Atradius Payment Practices Barometer China 2026, p. 5, chart 'Top 4 impacts of customer payment risk on working capital'
Average B2B payment terms in China rose to 76 days in 2024 (from 70 in 2023) - tied with Taiwan for the longest payment terms among the 9 Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveyed, and above the APAC average.
Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 (June 2025), 'Payment Survey Results by Economy' section, China country box, p. 9
The share of Chinese companies reporting ultra-long payment delays (over 180 days) worth more than 2% of annual turnover jumped to 49% in 2024 from 33.1% in 2023 (+15.9 points) - the third-largest increase of the 9 Asia-Pacific markets Coface surveyed, behind India (+33 points) and Thailand (+16.4 points).
Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 Coface Asia Payment Survey 2025 (June 2025), 'Payment Survey Results by Economy' section, China country box, p. 9; narrative context p. 3
Allianz forecasts Chinese business insolvencies to rise 9% in 2026 to 7,750 cases, continuing an upward trend since 2023 (6,481) - China accounts for 18.7% of Allianz's Global Insolvency Index, the second-largest single-country share after the United States (27.8%).
Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026 Statistical appendix, p. 26, China row
No statistic matches those filters.
If you are chasing an overdue invoice from a Chinese customer rather than researching the market, our China page covers how recovery works locally, who handles it and what it costs.
Inkasso in ChinaMethod and sources
The score is an editorial comparison index built from four public, independently published sources. For each country we take whichever of the four are available, map each onto a common 1-10 scale using a fixed linear mapping, and take the simple average. A country needs at least two of the four to receive a score. Scores run 1 to 10, where 10 is the highest collection risk, and display in four bands: Low below 3.5, Moderate 3.5-4.9, Elevated 5.0-6.4, High 6.5 and above.
Mappings: Coface Country Risk Assessment A1=1.0, A2=2.3, A3=3.6, A4=4.9, B=6.1, C=7.4, D=8.7, E=10.0 (160 countries). Allianz Collection Complexity Score max(1, score ÷ 10) (52 economies). World Bank B-READY max(1, (100 - the average of the Dispute Resolution and Business Insolvency topic scores) ÷ 10) (101 economies). WJP Rule of Law Index Civil Justice factor max(1, (1 - score) × 10) (143 countries). China draws on three of the four - B-READY does not cover China.
This is not a credit rating. It is an editorial comparison index for a statistics and journalism product - not a credit rating, not a probability of default, not a measure of any individual company’s creditworthiness, and not legal or financial advice. It is not produced by a regulated rating agency and must not be used as a substitute for one.
Every figure on this page is drawn from one of the seven primary sources listed below, extracted with an exact page, chart or dataset locator, and published only where that locator was verified in the source file itself. Figures from different publishers are reported side by side rather than merged: CRIBIS D&B, Coface, Allianz Trade, Atradius and the World Justice Project each survey or measure different samples with different definitions, and their numbers are not interchangeable.
The headline figures at the top of this page come from CRIBIS D&B’s Q4 2025 settled-payment release (57.4% paid on time) and Coface’s Asia Payment Survey 2025 (payment terms and ultra-long delay trends). China draws on both a dedicated Atradius China barometer and the shared 8-market Atradius Asia statistical appendix, plus a Coface Asia Payment Survey with a full by-economy breakdown across nine markets - richer country-specific coverage than several of the report’s other wave-1 countries.
Known gaps for China. The World Bank’s B-READY 2025 dataset does not cover China, so the country has three of four score components rather than four, and no B-READY court-duration or insolvency-cost figures appear here. Eurostat’s register-based bankruptcy index, used on this report’s European pages, is EU-only and does not cover China; Allianz Trade’s own insolvency count and forecast are used instead. No Atradius International Debt Collection Handbook chapter or equivalent legal-framework source was available for China in this wave of extraction, so this page carries no limitation-period or default-interest figure, and the commercial CTA module uses a collection-complexity figure instead of a legal one - a declared substitution, not an estimate. Xero Small Business Insights does not cover China, so there is no monthly Chinese time-to-pay series of the kind shown on the United States page.
| Source | Publisher | Year | China coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coface Country Risk Map | Coface | retrieved 6 August 2026 | Score component A - China rated B |
| Allianz Collection Complexity Score 2026 | Allianz Trade / Allianz Research | 2026 | Score component B - China 66/100, ranked 6th of 52 |
| World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 | World Justice Project | 2025 | Score component D - China's Civil Justice factor 0.53, ranked 70th of 143 |
| CRIBIS/D&B Payment Study 2026 (22nd edition) | CRIBIS D&B | 2026 (Q4 2025 data) | Chinese on-time payment rate within a 37-country release |
| Atradius Payment Practices Barometer | Atradius | 2026 | Chinese country barometer plus the 8-market Asia statistical appendix |
| Coface Payment Surveys (regional) | Coface | 2025 (Asia wave) | China country box within the 9-market Asia-Pacific payment survey |
| Allianz Global Insolvency Outlook 2026 | Allianz Trade / Allianz Research | 2026 | Chinese insolvency counts 2023-2027 and Global Insolvency Index share |
14 August 2026 - first publication of the China country report. 15 figures from 7 primary sources, plus the three Collection Risk Score components that cover China. This page is updated in place; new editions replace the content at this URL rather than creating a new year-specific page.