Top-Rated Debt Collection Agency in Lithuania
Your trusted debt collection agency in Lithuania offers swift claim recovery, zero upfront fees, and an ultimate guide to local debt collection practices. Discover more today.
The ultimate guide about debt collection in Lithuania
Why you can trust this guide
At Debitura, we uphold the highest standards of impartiality and precision to bring you comprehensive guides on international debt collection. Our editorial team boasts over a decade of specialized experience in this domain.
Questions or feedback? Email us at contact@debitura.com — we update this guide based on your input.
Debitura By the Numbers:
- 10+ years focused on international debt collection
- 100+ local attorneys in our partner network
- $100M+ recovered for clients in the last 18 months
- 4.97/5 average rating from 600+ client reviews
Expert-led, locally validated
Written by Robin Tam (16 years in global B2B debt recovery). Every page is reviewed by top local attorneys to ensure legal accuracy and practical steps you can use.
Contributing local experts:
Last updated:
Untangling the intricacies of Lithuanian debt collection, whether locally or globally, can be overwhelming. With Debitura as your guide, blending domestic knowledge with international exposure, we simplify this process. This resource ensures you're proficient in tackling Lithuanian debt recovery challenges.
Understanding Lithuanian Debt Recovery Actors
Grasping the roles of diverse contributors in Lithuania's debt recovery landscape is pivotal. From collection agencies to bailiffs and attorneys, each carries a unique role in the rigorously coordinated endeavor to recuperate debts, anchored firmly within Lithuania's stringent legal context.
Debt Collection Agencies in Lithuania: Navigating the Amicable Resolution Path
In the landscape of Lithuanian debt recovery, agencies dedicated to debt collection play a pivotal role, particularly in the terrain of extrajudicial or amicable collection processes. Tasked with the crucial first step in the debt recovery hierarchy, these agencies employ a range of strategies—from persuasive communication to thorough negotiation—to facilitate the voluntary settlement of debts. Legal mandates and industry codes guide their operations to ensure compassionate practices and safeguard debtor rights, mitigating the potential for undue harassment. Their sphere of influence lies within the realm of non-court interventions, making them a vital recourse for creditors who seek to avoid the complexities and confrontations of legal proceedings. However, their authority has its boundaries; should these initial attempts falter due to intransigent debtors or disputes over the debt validity, the involvement of the judicial system becomes inevitable to enforce collection.
Lawyers in Lithuania
In Lithuania, lawyers play a crucial role in the debt recovery process, especially when pre-trial negotiations have failed and legal action becomes necessary. Their involvement typically begins when a creditor decides to judicially pursue the recovery of unpaid debts. Lawyers are tasked with the preparation and submission of necessary legal documents, including contracts, invoices, and statements of account, which are fundamental in applying legal proceedings against the debtor. Furthermore, lawyers are instrumental in handling the lawsuit procedure, which includes the exchange of opinions and evidence, representation in court hearings, and ensuring the creditor's case is effectively presented. The litigation process requires intricate legal expertise to navigate, and lawyers are pivotal in advising creditors on the feasibility and potential costs of legal actions, as well as representing their interests throughout the court proceedings.
The Role of Bailiffs in Lithuania
In the landscape of Lithuanian debt recovery, the involvement of a bailiff marks a crucial phase where judicial decisions transition into tangible outcomes. The primary responsibility of bailiffs in Lithuania is executing court orders related to debt enforcement. This includes asset seizure, property evictions, and serving legal documentation. Bailiffs step into action when voluntary compliance with court-mandated debt repayment fails, ensuring that creditors' rights are realized through enforceable measures. Before a bailiff's intervention, a paramount requisite is obtaining a court order confirming the debt and the necessity of enforced collection. This process underscores a legally driven framework, aimed at balancing rigorous debt recovery while safeguarding debtors' rights from undue infringement. Governed by Lithuanian law, the tasks undertaken by bailiffs extend beyond mere enforcement; they are a testament to a structured judicial approach towards resolving fiscal disputes.
Understanding Lithuania's Debt Collection Legal Framework
In Lithuania, successful debt recovery hinges upon a comprehensive grasp of the intricate laws in place. Adhering to these regulations not only expedites debt recovery but also promotes fair transactions, fostering trust and uprightness in market operations.
.svg)
The Regulatory Environment and Civil Court System in Lithuania
The Lithuanian civil court system is structured to ensure justice is administered fairly, guided by principles of independence and impartiality. This three-tiered system addresses both civil and criminal matters efficiently.
- At the first level, District Courts act as the initial point for services including handling criminal, civil, and administrative offense cases. They also take on the role of pre-trial judges in certain situations.
- The second tier comprises Regional Courts that operate both as the first instance for specific territorial jurisdiction cases and as an appellate instance for decisions made by District Courts, with separate sections dedicated to civil and criminal cases.
- At the highest level, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Lithuania establish the appellate and cassation instances respectively, ensuring uniformity in law application and interpretation across the country.
This hierarchical structure promotes a systematic and disciplined approach to legal proceedings, safeguarding fair judgment and the rights of all parties involved. With specialized courts catering to administrative and significant national issues, Lithuania's judicial system is adept at managing varying degrees of legal complexities.
Key Legislation Impacting Debt Collection in Lithuania
In Lithuania, the act of debt collection is predominantly governed by a body of laws and regulations designed to ensure fairness and compliance. These include not only the Civil Procedure Code but also laws focusing on consumer protection, data processing, and bankruptcy.
- Civil Procedure Code: Central to the judicial debt recovery process, the Civil Procedure Code dictates the procedural aspects of litigating debt disputes in court, including the submission of relevant documents, court fees, and the timeline for legal proceedings.
- Consumer Protection Laws: These laws are designed to safeguard consumers from unfair debt collection practices, ensuring that debt recovery actions respect the debtor's rights and dignity, offering a layer of protection against potential abuses.
- Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): With the increasingly digital nature of transactions and debt collection, GDPR compliance is crucial for debt collectors in handling personal data ethically and legally during their operations.
- Law on Insolvency of Legal Entities: This legislation outlines the processes for insolvency and bankruptcy, providing a framework for debt collection in instances where the debtor is unable to fulfill their financial obligations.
Understanding these laws and regulations is quintessential for creditors and debt collection agencies like Debitura operating in Lithuania, ensuring that their collection efforts are both effective and compliant. The landscape of debt collection is framed by these legal structures, which aim to balance the interests of creditors with the rights and protections afforded to debtors.
Consumer Protection from Unfair Collection Practices in Lithuania
In Lithuania, stringent regulations guard consumers against unfair debt collection practices, employing a blend of legal and ethical safeguards designed to balance the interests of both creditors and debtors.
- Debt Collection Companies Law: This law regulates debt collection agencies, ensuring practices are compliant with standards and guidelines, thus protecting consumers from harassment and undue pressure.
- General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Influential in debt collection, GDPR mandates the ethical handling of personal data, ensuring consumers' privacy is respected throughout the collection process.
- Legal Actions Requirement: Before engaging in collection activities, agencies must take specific legal actions, such as providing written notice, which serves to inform and protect consumer rights.
- Laws on Communication: Limitations are imposed on how and when debt collectors can contact debtors, preventing harassment and ensuring respectful and fair communication.
- Right to Legal Redress: Consumers have the right to challenge debt collection practices and seek legal recourse if their rights are violated, ensuring a balanced and just process.
Lithuanian consumer protection laws in the context of debt collection are designed to prevent abusive practices, safeguard personal data, and ensure fair treatment of all parties involved in the debt collection process. By promoting responsible collection practices and supporting consumer rights, these regulations help maintain the integrity of financial transactions and encourage a respectful creditor-debtor relationship.
Understanding the Amicable Debt Collection Process in Lithuania
Engaging with the pre-legal, or amicable, debt collection methods in Lithuania can streamline the resolution of debt. This process, often facilitated by debt collection agencies, offers a swift and uncomplicated approach to settling debts without the need for court engagement.
- Amicable Debt Recovery Process: Prioritizes negotiation to settle debts without formal litigation.
- Transition to Judicial Recovery: Initiated if amicable efforts fail, leading to formal legal proceedings.
- Statute of Limitations: Ten years for general debts, with exceptions allowing for extension.
- Fees and Additional Costs: Allows addition of various fees to the principal amount, including legal and court costs.
- Interest Rates on Late Payments: Penalty rate is ECB rate plus eight percentage points for delayed payments.
- Required Documentation: Essential to prepare substantial documentation, including proof of debt and legal papers.
- Cost Implications: Generally less costly than legal proceedings but involves documentation and communication expenses.
- Timeline Considerations: Duration varies based on debtor's responsiveness; aims for quickest resolution.
- When to Employ Amicable Recovery: Suitable when debtor is likely willing and able to settle without legal action.
- Shifting to Judicial Recovery: Considered when negotiations fail and the limitations period for court action nears.
Navigating Amicable Debt Collection in Lithuania
In Lithuania, the essence of amicable debt collection revolves around a harmonious and empathetic interaction between the creditor and debtor. This approach is designed to facilitate a mutual agreement, ensuring the creditor's recovery in a manner that is mindful of the debtor's current circumstances. It's a path less trodden compared to legal disputes and is recommended for clear-cut cases where the claim is uncontested.
Opting for an amicable approach is your best bet unless faced with contentious or legally involved matters.
The Essential Role of Collection Agencies in Lithuania
When creditors find themselves without the resources or knowledge for effective debt collection, agencies like Debitura play a crucial role. Beginning with an accurate delineation of debt specifics, followed by initiating tailored communications, collection agencies perform a pivotal function. Our neutral position, free from any emotional entanglements, significantly increases the chances of a successful resolution by offering unbiased, expert mediation.
Why Choose Amicable Debt Resolution?
The amicable route is advantageous for all parties involved. Creditors can avoid the financial burden of court proceedings and preserve essential business relationships, thanks to the respectful nature of this process. Debtors, on the other hand, are offered more flexible repayment conditions, which alleviate their financial distress and facilitate a more positive outlook towards settling their dues. At its core, this method promotes dignity and understanding, cultivating an environment where obligations can be fulfilled amicably.
When to Consider Legal Collection in Lithuania
Although amicable collection is often beneficial, there are scenarios when you might need to evaluate legal alternatives. Indicators for this transition include lack of communication, recurrent defaulting, or intentional dodging by the debtor. Transitioning to legal proceedings is a profound decision, weighed down by the potential for high costs and lengthy durations. It is, therefore, advisable only after all amicable avenues have been explored.
Understanding Amicable Debt Collection Costs in Lithuania
Debitura transparently offers international debt collection services in Lithuania on a no-win, no-fee basis. This model ensures you incur no initial costs, with a compensation fee of 7.5% to 30% charged only on successful debt recoveries. Getting started is straightforward—no setup fees or subscriptions. Discover our pricing structure here.
The Amicable Collection Process with Debitura
Engage with Debitura for a seamless amicable debt recovery experience, typically spanning 2-3 months:
- Easy Sign-Up: Begin without any upfront fees. Set up your account now.
- Submit Your Claim: Register your claim, review the applicable fees, and authorize to commence.
- Monitor Your Case: Stay updated with the progress of your claim through the Debitura dashboard.
- Exploring Legal Options: For unresolved cases, we will extend three quotes from local legal professionals for potential litigation, allowing you to make an informed decision on the subsequent steps.
The Legalities of Debt Collection in Lithuania
When amicable efforts fall short in debt recovery, judicial debt collection steps in. This process involves garnering a court mandate to support claim enforcement via bailiffs. But unless it's a small-claims case, you will mostly need legal help. Let's delve into Lithuania's specific procedures in judicial debt collection.
- Court System Hierarchy: Consists of district, regional, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, and specialized administrative courts.
- Debt Collection Laws: Govern the activities of debt collection agencies, focusing on compliance, fair treatment, and prevention of harassment.
- Consumer Protection: The law XIIIP-1741(4) ensures fair treatment and informational accuracy during the debt collection process.
- Judicial Collection Process: Involves document preparation, court rulings, enforcement documentation, and potentially involving a bailiff.
- Court Order for Debt: Creditors can obtain an enforceable court order efficiently if the debtor does not object within 20 days.
- Appropriate Court Selection: Depends on case specifics, with small claims procedures available for low-value disputes.
- Small Claims Procedure: Offers an expedient, cost-effective option for resolving disputes involving minor amounts.
- Legal Fees: Court and legal representation fees are significant, with recent changes potentially increasing litigation costs.
- Recovery Timeline and Risks: Varies by case complexity, with financial viability and recoverability as critical considerations.
- Consumer Rights Defense: Laws protect against abusive debt collection, ensuring fairness and access to accurate information.
Shifting from Amicable to Judicial Debt Collection in Lithuania
In Lithuania, debt collection can proceed through amicable means, typically involving negotiations and voluntary compliance by the debtor, or through judicial means, which involve formal legal proceedings. The transition from amicable to judicial debt collection often becomes necessary when disputes arise over the debt or when debtors do not respond to informal collection efforts. In such cases, the intervention of the court system becomes a pivotal next step in enforcing the creditor's rights.
Seeking legal counsel or representation is crucial during judicial debt recovery. The complexities of the Lithuanian legal system and the specific procedural requirements of debt collection cases necessitate professional guidance to navigate effectively. Legal professionals specializing in debt collection can provide invaluable support, from the preparation of necessary documents to representation in court hearings.
The Importance of a Formal Judgment in Lithuania
A court order is a legal document issued by a court that mandates the debtor to fulfill their financial obligations to the creditor. In Lithuania, acquiring a court order is a critical step in the judicial debt collection process, allowing the creditor to enforce the debt legally if voluntary payment isn't forthcoming. To obtain a court order, the creditor must submit an application to the local court where the debtor resides. The process is streamlined, aiming for efficiency and cost-effectiveness, with the court typically deciding on the application by the next working day after submission.
Upon obtaining a court order, if the debtor fails to object or settle the debt within 20 days, the creditor is then entitled to compulsory execution, which may involve engaging a bailiff to enforce the order. The enforcement of the court order signifies the debtor's obligation to fulfill the claim under the threat of legal enforcement measures, such as asset seizure.
Determining the Appropriate Court in Lithuania
Determining the appropriate court for a debt recovery case in Lithuania depends on various factors, including the size and complexity of the claim. The Lithuanian court system is structured to handle different cases across its hierarchies, from district courts to the Supreme Court. Generally, district courts serve as the first instance for criminal, civil, and administrative offenses cases, making them a common venue for initial legal actions in debt recovery.
For more complex cases, or where the debtor resides outside a creditor's local district, regional courts or the Court of Appeal may become involved, especially at the appellate level. It's worth noting that from January 1, 2024, the Regional Administrative Court will operate specializing in administrative disputes, which could potentially cover certain debt recovery actions against public administration entities.
Understanding the jurisdiction and functional areas of each court within the Lithuanian legal system is paramount in selecting the right venue for debt recovery actions. Given this complexity, securing expert legal advice is advisable to ensure that the creditor's actions are both appropriate and effective in recovering owed debts.
Small Claims Court in Lithuania
In Lithuania, the Small Claims Court process is a swift and efficient way for creditors to recover debts up to a certain threshold. Designed to facilitate the resolution of lower-value disputes, this streamlined process significantly reduces the complexity, cost, and time traditionally associated with legal proceedings. Although specific limits may vary, this framework is particularly suited for claims involving smaller amounts, allowing businesses and individuals to mitigate risks and protect their financial interests more effectively. By providing a simplified judicial pathway, the Lithianian legal system supports expedited debt recovery, ensuring that creditors can pursue claims with minimal delay. It emphasizes the importance of an accessible, effective legal recourse for smaller scale financial disputes, embodying the principles of justice and efficiency within the Lithuanian judicial collection framework.
Ordinary Proceedings in Lithuania
In Lithuania, Ordinary Proceedings offer a comprehensive legal avenue for debt recovery beyond the small claims court. This route is particularly advantageous for complex cases or when the dispute exceeds the monetary limits of small claims court. Unlike the more concise procedure of small claims, Ordinary Proceedings allow for a deeper examination of evidence and legal arguments, making them suitable for significant debts or intricate legal issues. Moreover, these proceedings mandate legal representation, ensuring that both parties are adequately represented by professionals well-versed in Lithuanian law and procedure. This requirement underscores the complexity and formal nature of Ordinary Proceedings. Governed by the Lithuanian Civil Procedure Code, these proceedings embody a structured approach to dispute resolution, facilitating a thorough judicial assessment of claims. The Civil Procedure Code, along with specific regulations pertaining to debt collection, sets the legal framework within which creditors must navigate to pursue debt recovery through the Lithuanian court system.
Navigating Debt Enforcement in Lithuania
Securing a court order is the initial step in the judicial debt collection in Lithuania, propelling you towards debt enforcement. Overseen by official bailiffs, this phase empowers the creditor to seize the debtor's assets, facilitating the successful settlement of their claim.
- Debt Enforcement in Lithuania: Involves a structured legal process including court decisions and enforcement through bailiffs.
- Role of Bailiffs in Lithuania: Bailiffs execute court decisions by seizing assets and organizing auctions for debt recovery, ensuring compliance and oversight.
- Application for Court Order: Necessitates signed contracts, invoices, correspondence, for initiating legal actions for debt recovery.
- Cost Implications of Debt Enforcement: Comprises document preparation fees, court fees, bailiff services, and legal representation, varying by case complexity.
- Execution by Bailiffs: Bailiffs seize accounts and assets, with their costs reimbursed by the creditor and later recovered from the debtor.
- Temporary Protective Measures: Can be applied by courts to prevent execution difficulties before a decision, safeguarding creditor interests.
- Regulatory Compliance in Lithuania: Governed by the Civil Procedure Code and amendments aimed at expediting the collection process.
- Protection of Minimal Living Standards: Lithuanian law ensures a portion of debtor's income and essential assets are protected, balancing creditor rights and debtor welfare.
- Garnishment in Lithuania: Legal actions allow wage garnishment, "atlyginimo areštas," following a court order to satisfy debts from debtor's income.
- Debtor Consequences: Face potential asset seizure, garnishment, and impact on their financial credibility, with rights to challenge unjust garnishments.
The Crucial Role of Bailiffs in Lithuanian Debt Enforcement
In Lithuania, bailiffs, also known as enforcement agents, play a pivotal role in the debt enforcement process. Tasked with executing court orders, these professionals embark on locating and seizing the debtor's assets. The gamut of their responsibilities includes asset identification, valuation, orchestrating sales—typically via auctions—and distributing the proceeds to creditors, all meticulously conducted under the purview of Lithuania's legal framework.
Detailed Steps in the Lithuanian Debt Enforcement Process
The journey of debt enforcement in Lithuania commences when a creditor, armed with an enforceable title that unequivocally establishes the debtor's obligation, advances a claim. This title could manifest in various forms, from judicial decisions to formally ratified agreements. Subsequently, bailiffs undertake the task of locating and seizing assets, which may range from real estate to vehicles, while ensuring the protection of certain personal belongings and income thresholds essential for the debtor's sustenance.
Understanding Costs and the Legal Landscape in Lithuania
Awareness of the expenses involved in debt enforcement—encompassing court fees, bailiff charges, and legal representation costs—is vital for creditors. These expenditures, which fluctuate based on the complexity and duration of the case, underscore the importance of understanding the legal bedrock that delineates debt enforcement procedures, delineates bailiff roles, and safeguards the rights of all parties, guaranteeing transparency and equity.
Preparatory Measures before Enforcement
Prior to enforcement, it is incumbent upon creditors to ensure possession of a valid enforceable title. A final demand for payment issued to the debtor marks this preparatory phase, setting the stage for subsequent legal proceedings. This step not only acknowledges the debtor's right to settle the debt voluntarily but also upholds their entitlement to contest or challenge enforcement actions, fostering a balanced and fair debt recovery ecosystem.
Optimizing Enforcement Outcomes
Ensuring a streamlined debt enforcement process requires diligence in preparing documentation, understanding the risks, and considering temporary protective measures to secure interests before obtaining a court verdict. These measures, requested by the creditor and sanctioned by the court, may impede the debtor's ability to further dissipate assets, thus preserving the creditor's potential recovery. Recognizing the intricate dance between ensuring creditors' rights and protecting debtors from undue hardship or abuse is critical in Lithuania’s debt enforcement landscape.
The Significance of Legal Representation and Bailiff Services
Engaging professional bailiff services and legal representation can significantly impact the efficiency and effectiveness of debt recovery efforts. Not only does this professional assistance aid in navigating the complexities of the legal system, but it also ensures adherence to procedural norms and regulations, thereby maximizing the likelihood of a favorable outcome for creditors. The expertise of these professionals, especially in understanding the nuances of Lithuanian debt enforcement law, becomes invaluable in these scenarios.
Understanding Debt Recovery through Insolvency Procedures in Lithuania
Insolvency, a stage where debtors cannot satisfy their outstanding financial obligations, often proves challenging for traditional debt recovery methods like asset seizures. In such scenarios, the insolvency proceedings in Lithuania become a vital route. These legal procedures attempt a systematic liquidation of the debtor's assets, providing a final resort to recover some possible restitution for unsettled claims.
- Bankruptcy Declaration: Utilized when a company cannot meet its financial obligations, potentially through court or non-court procedures.
- Role of Bankruptcy Administrator: Takes over the management, safeguarding assets, and deciding on the continuity of business operations.
- Legal Framework: Insolvency procedures are outlined in Lithuanian law, ensuring a structured process for asset liquidation and creditor repayment.
- Court's Involvement: Initiates and oversees bankruptcy proceedings, with the possibility of judicious actions against the entity upon creditor's request.
- Claim Submission: Creditors need to submit detailed claims and supporting evidence to the bankruptcy administrator within set deadlines.
- Creditor Meetings: Decision on whether the company continues operations for asset liquidation benefit is determined during creditors' meetings.
- Employee Contract Termination: Governed by labor laws, except for those involved in ongoing operations or the bankruptcy process.
- Personal Bankruptcy: Includes filing a petition, court evaluation, the possibility of a repayment plan, and potential debt discharge.
- Secured vs. Unsecured Creditors: Secured creditors often recover more due to priority claims, which is critical in insolvency distributions.
- Appeal Rights: Creditors can challenge decisions through higher judicial review, aiming to safeguard their interests.
Insolvency Proceedings in Lithuania: A Comprehensive Overview for Creditors
In Lithuania, the process of addressing the insolvency of a debtor—whether an individual or a legal entity—is enclosed in a legal framework designed to ensure the orderly resolution of insolvent estates. Built upon principles of fairness and efficiency, this system aims to balance the interests of both debtors and creditors. It provides a dual pathway: restructuring to recover the debtor's business where feasible or liquidating assets to settle debts otherwise. The initiation of insolvency proceedings is permitted when a debtor is unable to satisfy financial commitments on a regular basis. This bifold approach underlines the Lithuanian legal landscape’s adaptability and responsiveness to various insolvency scenarios.
Protecting Creditors' Interests and Hierarchy of Claims
Central to Lithuanian insolvency proceedings is the meticulous categorization and prioritization of creditor claims. This distinction, spanning from secured claims with collateral to unsecured ones, plays a pivotal role in determining the probability of debt recovery. In this regard, creditors are mandated to formally register their claims within the stipulated windows of opportunity. Proactive engagement, for instance through contributions to creditor committees or dialogs on reorganization endeavors, can significantly amplify the chances of reclaiming dues. Moreover, understanding these protocols is essential for creditors aiming to navigate the complexities of insolvency cases adeptly.
Cost Implications and Procedural Duration
Embarking on insolvency proceedings in Lithuania incurs various expenditures, including but not limited to court fees, administrative costs, and potential outlays for legal counsel. These expenses are typically accounted for from the insolvent estate prior to the disbursement of funds to creditors. Additionally, the timeline for insolvency processes can greatly vary, influenced by the intricate nature of the debtor's fiscal scenarios, the breadth of creditor claims, and potential judicial disputes. This variability underscores the necessity for creditors to brace themselves for protracted involvement, which may influence the timeline for recouping debts.
Find a Local Debt Collection Lawyer
Need court-ready representation? Share your case once and receive up to three proposals from vetted litigation attorneys—free, fast, and with no commitment.
- Verified specialists
- Quotes in 24 h, no hidden fees
- Fair, pre-negotiated rates
Juris LT, UAB is a premier debt recovery agency in Vilnius offering effective Debt Collection services in Lithuania, established in 2014, operating under a no-win, no-fee model, and recognized for its commitment to high-quality legal assistance and continuous service.
.webp)
.png)
.png)
Law Firm Linden is a premier law firm in Vilnius offering effective Debt Collection services in Lithuania, established in 2010, leveraging proprietary software for efficient case management and recognized for its membership in esteemed legal associations.
Law Firm VERUM is a premier law firm in Vilnius offering effective Debt Collection services in Lithuania, established in 2000, recognized by The Legal 500, and a member of LINEKA, serving Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Poland.
Advokato Arūno Stuko Kontora is a premier law firm in Kaunas offering effective Debt Collection services in Lithuania, positioning itself as the go-to partner for debt recovery since 2014, with accolades and membership in the Lithuanian Bar Association.
CCS-customers care services UAB is a premier debt recovery agency in Vilnius offering effective Debt Collection services in Lithuania, established in 2013, and serving across the Baltics and Central Europe, with membership in The TCM Group.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore our most common FAQs below—or reach out directly at contact@debitura.com if you need help with a specific case.
.svg){kind=icon}
.webp)